Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors. / Studte, Sinika; Clement, Michel; Soliman, Meikel et al.
In: Transfusion, Vol. 59, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 1002-1015.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Studte S, Clement M, Soliman M, Boenigk S. Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors. Transfusion. 2019 Mar;59(3):1002-1015. doi: 10.1111/trf.15085

Bibtex

@article{7e8f3fbb812248ae9622f8c09bb0b79f,
title = "Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors",
abstract = "BACKGROUNDIncreasing competition by nonprofit organizations provides blood donors with many options to engage themselves prosocially (e.g., by donating money or time). While most previous studies focused only on one form of donation, only a few studies analyzed two or more forms. This research gap is remarkable, as prior research has shown that a substantial portion of donors engage in more than one form of donation. In addition, studies have shown that donors' main reason for lapsing is switching to another donation form.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSThis study relies on longitudinal data from the German Socio‐Economic Panel. In total, 5640 (non)blood donors are analyzed over a period of 5 years, alongside their engagement in four forms of prosocial behavior: money donations, taking care of persons in need, volunteer work, and citizens' initiatives. We control for sociodemographic, psychographic, and health‐related factors and rely on propensity score matching to reduce selection effects often observed in the blood donation context.RESULTSThere are significant differences between blood donors and nondonors in their engagement in prosocial behaviors. Blood donors (vs. nondonors) are more likely to engage in other prosocial behavior forms, namely, donating money, volunteering, and participating in citizens' initiatives. If people start donating blood, they also are more likely to act in other prosocial ways, namely, donating money and volunteering. If people stop donating blood, they also are more likely to stop other forms of prosocial behavior, namely, volunteering and participating in citizens' initiatives.CONCLUSIONThis study provides new insights into blood donors' prosocial behavior. While most previous studies neglected blood donors' engagement in other prosocial behaviors, this study highlights the fact that blood banks need to be aware of blood donor switching behavior between all prosocial behavior forms. As most blood banks also are providing other types of donations forms, they can use this knowledge and cross‐recruit blood donors to engage in other forms of prosocial behavior.",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "Sinika Studte and Michel Clement and Meikel Soliman and Silke Boenigk",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 AABB",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1111/trf.15085",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1002--1015",
journal = "Transfusion",
issn = "0041-1132",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors

AU - Studte, Sinika

AU - Clement, Michel

AU - Soliman, Meikel

AU - Boenigk, Silke

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 AABB

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - BACKGROUNDIncreasing competition by nonprofit organizations provides blood donors with many options to engage themselves prosocially (e.g., by donating money or time). While most previous studies focused only on one form of donation, only a few studies analyzed two or more forms. This research gap is remarkable, as prior research has shown that a substantial portion of donors engage in more than one form of donation. In addition, studies have shown that donors' main reason for lapsing is switching to another donation form.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSThis study relies on longitudinal data from the German Socio‐Economic Panel. In total, 5640 (non)blood donors are analyzed over a period of 5 years, alongside their engagement in four forms of prosocial behavior: money donations, taking care of persons in need, volunteer work, and citizens' initiatives. We control for sociodemographic, psychographic, and health‐related factors and rely on propensity score matching to reduce selection effects often observed in the blood donation context.RESULTSThere are significant differences between blood donors and nondonors in their engagement in prosocial behaviors. Blood donors (vs. nondonors) are more likely to engage in other prosocial behavior forms, namely, donating money, volunteering, and participating in citizens' initiatives. If people start donating blood, they also are more likely to act in other prosocial ways, namely, donating money and volunteering. If people stop donating blood, they also are more likely to stop other forms of prosocial behavior, namely, volunteering and participating in citizens' initiatives.CONCLUSIONThis study provides new insights into blood donors' prosocial behavior. While most previous studies neglected blood donors' engagement in other prosocial behaviors, this study highlights the fact that blood banks need to be aware of blood donor switching behavior between all prosocial behavior forms. As most blood banks also are providing other types of donations forms, they can use this knowledge and cross‐recruit blood donors to engage in other forms of prosocial behavior.

AB - BACKGROUNDIncreasing competition by nonprofit organizations provides blood donors with many options to engage themselves prosocially (e.g., by donating money or time). While most previous studies focused only on one form of donation, only a few studies analyzed two or more forms. This research gap is remarkable, as prior research has shown that a substantial portion of donors engage in more than one form of donation. In addition, studies have shown that donors' main reason for lapsing is switching to another donation form.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSThis study relies on longitudinal data from the German Socio‐Economic Panel. In total, 5640 (non)blood donors are analyzed over a period of 5 years, alongside their engagement in four forms of prosocial behavior: money donations, taking care of persons in need, volunteer work, and citizens' initiatives. We control for sociodemographic, psychographic, and health‐related factors and rely on propensity score matching to reduce selection effects often observed in the blood donation context.RESULTSThere are significant differences between blood donors and nondonors in their engagement in prosocial behaviors. Blood donors (vs. nondonors) are more likely to engage in other prosocial behavior forms, namely, donating money, volunteering, and participating in citizens' initiatives. If people start donating blood, they also are more likely to act in other prosocial ways, namely, donating money and volunteering. If people stop donating blood, they also are more likely to stop other forms of prosocial behavior, namely, volunteering and participating in citizens' initiatives.CONCLUSIONThis study provides new insights into blood donors' prosocial behavior. While most previous studies neglected blood donors' engagement in other prosocial behaviors, this study highlights the fact that blood banks need to be aware of blood donor switching behavior between all prosocial behavior forms. As most blood banks also are providing other types of donations forms, they can use this knowledge and cross‐recruit blood donors to engage in other forms of prosocial behavior.

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058468978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/trf.15085

DO - 10.1111/trf.15085

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 30549293

VL - 59

SP - 1002

EP - 1015

JO - Transfusion

JF - Transfusion

SN - 0041-1132

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Larissa Kirmair

Publications

  1. Administrative silence
  2. Nachhaltige Gesellschaft
  3. Arbeitszufriedenheit und flexible Arbeitszeit
  4. Auslegung und Schicksal des Bieterangebots im Vergabeverfahren
  5. Voluntary Corporate Health Promotion as Strategic Function of HRM
  6. Talks about sustainability—Sustainable talks? communicative construction of the social fiction of sustainability
  7. Trauer um Prof. Hermann Schweppenhäuser
  8. Immanenz und Produktivität der Normen
  9. Mediale Unterhaltungsangebote aus gesellschaftskritischer Perspektive
  10. Zur (Un-)Bedeutsamkeit der Ökonomisierung. Eine Differenzierung des Einflusses ökonomischer Logiken auf Akteur:innen der stationären Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
  11. Lesemotivationen und Lesehandlungen bei Schülern
  12. Abschluss des Vertrages
  13. Soziale Disparitäten
  14. Deutsch-Stunden
  15. Zur Qualitätsbeurteilung von professionellen Telefongesprächen in Callcentern
  16. Abschluss des Vertrages
  17. Parliaments in time
  18. Was macht Jugendliche fit für die Berufswahl?
  19. "Ich kann sagen: Nächstes Jahr ist okay! Mehr kann ich nicht sagen."
  20. Strategie als Herausforderung für die deliberative Demokratietheorie
  21. Lernfähigkeit und Geschlecht
  22. Leuphana Sommerakademie
  23. Alltag in den Medien - Medien im Alltag
  24. Partizipation von Kindern und Jugendlichen
  25. Krieg zum Mitspielen
  26. Francesca Ferrando (2019): Philosophical Posthumanism. Theory in the New Humanities, Series Editor: Rosi Braidotti, Preface by Rosi Braidotti). Bloomsbury Academic (27 June, 2019), 296 pages, ISBN:1350059501, ISBN: 9781350059504
  27. Umweltchemikalien 50 Jahre nach Silent Spring: ein ungelöstes Problem
  28. Erfolgserfassung nach Handels- und Steuerrecht sowie nach IFRS
  29. Geschäftsführung ohne Auftrag (§ 679)
  30. Ökonomische Bildung mit Kindern und Jugendlichen
  31. Wettbewerbsrecht, europäisches, Funktion
  32. Perspektivrahmen Sachunterricht