Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenRezensionenForschung

Standard

Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union. / Holterhus, Till Patrik.
European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. Hrsg. / Marc Bungenberg; Christoph Herrmann; Markus Krajewski; Jörg Philipp Terhechte. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2016. S. 831-834 (European Yearbook of International Economic Law; Band 2016).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenRezensionenForschung

Harvard

Holterhus, TP 2016, Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union. in M Bungenberg, C Herrmann, M Krajewski & JP Terhechte (Hrsg.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Bd. 2016, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, S. 831-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

APA

Holterhus, T. P. (2016). Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union. In M. Bungenberg, C. Herrmann, M. Krajewski, & J. P. Terhechte (Hrsg.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016 (S. 831-834). (European Yearbook of International Economic Law; Band 2016). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

Vancouver

Holterhus TP. Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union. in Bungenberg M, Herrmann C, Krajewski M, Terhechte JP, Hrsg., European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2016. S. 831-834. (European Yearbook of International Economic Law). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

Bibtex

@inbook{08e6da8029a54f60a63523958ee9d50c,
title = "Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europ{\"a}ischem Unionsrecht: Zul{\"a}ssigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europ{\"a}ischen Union",
abstract = "After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU{\textquoteright}s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.",
keywords = "Rechtswissenschaft, Arbitral Tribunal, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Fierce Debate, Investment Arbitration, Constitutional Question",
author = "Holterhus, {Till Patrik}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39",
language = "Deutsch",
isbn = "978-3-319-29214-4",
series = "European Yearbook of International Economic Law",
publisher = "Springer Nature Switzerland AG",
pages = "831--834",
editor = "Marc Bungenberg and Christoph Herrmann and Markus Krajewski and Terhechte, {J{\"o}rg Philipp}",
booktitle = "European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016",
address = "Schweiz",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht

T2 - Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union

AU - Holterhus, Till Patrik

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.

AB - After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.

KW - Rechtswissenschaft

KW - Arbitral Tribunal

KW - Bilateral Investment Treaty

KW - Fierce Debate

KW - Investment Arbitration

KW - Constitutional Question

UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f26cc4a4-141d-3824-9d8d-12c054a29491/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39

M3 - Rezensionen

SN - 978-3-319-29214-4

T3 - European Yearbook of International Economic Law

SP - 831

EP - 834

BT - European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016

A2 - Bungenberg, Marc

A2 - Herrmann, Christoph

A2 - Krajewski, Markus

A2 - Terhechte, Jörg Philipp

PB - Springer Nature Switzerland AG

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI