Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Critical Reviews › Research
Standard
Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht : Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union. / Holterhus, Till Patrik.
European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. ed. / Marc Bungenberg; Christoph Herrmann; Markus Krajewski; Jörg Philipp Terhechte. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2016. p. 831-834 (European Yearbook of International Economic Law; Vol. 2016).Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Critical Reviews › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht
T2 - Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union
AU - Holterhus, Till Patrik
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.
AB - After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.
KW - Rechtswissenschaft
KW - Arbitral Tribunal
KW - Bilateral Investment Treaty
KW - Fierce Debate
KW - Investment Arbitration
KW - Constitutional Question
UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f26cc4a4-141d-3824-9d8d-12c054a29491/
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_39
M3 - Rezensionen
SN - 978-3-319-29214-4
T3 - European Yearbook of International Economic Law
SP - 831
EP - 834
BT - European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016
A2 - Bungenberg, Marc
A2 - Herrmann, Christoph
A2 - Krajewski, Markus
A2 - Terhechte, Jörg Philipp
PB - Springer Nature Switzerland AG
CY - Cham
ER -