Open to Offers, but Resisting Requests: How the Framing of Anchors Affects Motivation and Negotiated Outcomes

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Abundant research has established that first proposals can anchor negotiations and lead to a first-mover advantage. The current research developed and tested a motivated anchor adjustment hypothesis that integrates the literatures on framing and anchoring and highlights how anchoring in negotiations differs in significant ways from standard decision-making contexts. Our research begins with the premise that first proposals can be framed as either an offer of resources (e.g., I am offering my A for your B) that highlights gains versus a request for resources (e.g., I am requesting your B for my A) that highlights losses to a responder. We propose that this framing would affect the concession aversion of responders and ultimately the negotiated outcomes. We predicted that when a first proposal is framed as an offer, the well-documented anchoring and first-mover advantage effect would emerge because offers do not create high levels of concession aversion. In contrast, because requests highlight what the responder has to give up, we predicted that opening requests would produce concession aversion and eliminate and even reverse the first-mover advantage. Across 5 experiments, the classic first-mover advantage in negotiations was moderated by the framing of proposals because anchor framing affected concession aversion. The studies highlight how motivational forces (i.e., concession aversion) play an important role in producing anchoring effects, which has been predominantly viewed through a purely cognitive lens. Overall, the findings highlight when and how motivational processes play a key role in both judgmental heuristics and mixed-motive decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume119
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)582-599
Number of pages18
ISSN0022-3514
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2020

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Liebe
  2. Can Becoming a Leader Change Your Personality?
  3. Den Untergang beschreiben
  4. Exports and Productivity Growth
  5. How Music Touches
  6. Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs
  7. Heavy Metal in der DDR
  8. Nine Degrees of Uncertainty in Negotiations
  9. Automatisiertes Verhalten?
  10. Is small beautiful?
  11. Anerkennung von Differenz in der Sozialen Arbeit
  12. Expatriate Management
  13. Substanz, Körper und Affekte
  14. Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice
  15. Der Himbeerwurm
  16. Camouflagen des Computers
  17. Photodegradation, Photocatalytic and Aerobic Biodegradation of Sulfisomidine and Identification of Transformation Products By LC–UV-MS/MS
  18. Analysekompetenz - ein zweidimensionales Konstrukt?
  19. On the evidence for human use and control of fire at Schöningen
  20. Sunny Side Down
  21. Still want to Party?
  22. Transitions and Old Age Potential
  23. Online intervention for prevention of major depression
  24. Spatial characterization of coastal marine social-ecological systems
  25. Settingbasierte Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention
  26. Democracy in times of the pandemic
  27. Entgrenzung des künstlerischen Feldes durch Globalisierung ?
  28. Editorial
  29. The lipid composition of the in situ pellicle
  30. Technikfolgenabschätzung und ihre Bedeutung für künftige Hightech-Strategien
  31. Party, Coalition, Premiership
  32. Geschlecht in Raumwissenschaften und -planung
  33. Swissness Communication and its Impact on Consumer-Brand Relationships
  34. Prevalence of depression in cancer patients
  35. EWMN
  36. Evaluating the success of public participation in water resources management: five key constituents
  37. Praedicatio Identica
  38. Portfolio optimization in zonal energy markets