Expanding the pie or spoiling the cake? How the number of negotiation issues affects integrative bargaining

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The present research investigates how the number of issues affects the quality of outcomes in terms of joint gains and impasse rates in integrative negotiations. In the literature, two opposing positions exist reflecting a complexity dilemma regarding the number of negotiation issues: One position suggests that complex negotiations involving higher numbers of issues offer more trade-off opportunities, thereby providing negotiators with greater structural flexibility in reaching mutually beneficial agreements, which improves outcome quality. The opposite position emphasizes that the greater information load inherent in negotiating more issues impedes outcome quality. We propose a third, intermediate position: Negotiating more issues may only improve outcome quality up to a threshold, above which adding further issues results in deteriorated outcomes. We tested these propositions using a quasi-meta-analytic technique by examining the associations between the number of issues, joint gains, and impasse rates across multiple empirical studies on integrative negotiations using various negotiation tasks with different numbers of issues (N = 38,063/21,271 negotiations for joint gains/impasse rates). Moreover, we investigated whether factors related to how negotiators subjectively deal with the increased complexity associated with higher numbers of issues moderate the number-of-issues effect on joint gains. Multilevel analyses revealed no significant number-of-issues effect on joint gains up to a threshold of 3 issues but a negative effect for negotiations involving more than 3 issues. By contrast, we did not find a number-of-issues effect on impasse rates. Moreover, we did not obtain evidence for moderation effects. Findings are discussed with respect to their theoretical and practical implications.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume109
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1224-1249
Number of pages26
ISSN0021-9010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association

    Research areas

  • complexity, impasses, integrative negotiation, joint gains, number of issues
  • Psychology

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Thermal synthesis of a thermochemical heat storage with heat exchanger optimization
  2. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of health care systems for alcohol use disorders
  3. Time- and age-related effects of experimentally simulated nitrogen deposition on the functioning of montane heathland ecosystems
  4. Integration in Controllingsystemen
  5. Hierarchy and respect
  6. From Values to Emotions
  7. Integrated curvature sensing of soft bending actuators using inertial measurement units
  8. Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation
  9. Using machine learning to identify important predictors of COVID-19 infection prevention behaviors during the early phase of the pandemic
  10. Explorations in regional variation
  11. What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany, and a research agenda
  12. Developing pragmatic competence using EFL textbooks: Focus on requests
  13. Explosive behaviour and long memory with an application to European bond yield spreads
  14. Comparison of different FEM code approaches in the simulation of the die deflection during aluminium extrusion
  15. Modeling Turning Points In Global Equity Market
  16. The Mushroom at the End of the World
  17. Global Governance and the Interplay of Coordination and Contestation
  18. Quantification of phototrophically grown Galdieria sulphuraria and other microalgae using diphenylamine
  19. Prekäre Subjekte - Prekäre Kritik
  20. Evidence-based narratives in European research programming