Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. / Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana; Leventon, Julia; Lang, Daniel J.
in: Environmental Science and Policy, Jahrgang 136, 01.10.2022, S. 187-197.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Horcea-Milcu AI, Leventon J, Lang DJ. Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. Environmental Science and Policy. 2022 Okt 1;136:187-197. Epub 2022 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

Bibtex

@article{21b240de9dfb4ec6a1bf2916146ab2a6,
title = "Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning",
abstract = "Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.",
keywords = "Co-creation, Co-design, Leverage points, Reflexivity, Sustainability initiatives, Sustainability transformation, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Horcea-Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and Julia Leventon and Lang, {Daniel J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "187--197",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making transdisciplinarity happen

T2 - Phase 0, or before the beginning

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Leventon, Julia

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

AB - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

KW - Co-creation

KW - Co-design

KW - Leverage points

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Sustainability initiatives

KW - Sustainability transformation

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132792818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132792818

VL - 136

SP - 187

EP - 197

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Unbearable Witness: Toward a Politics of Listening
  2. Die Reformvorschläge der EU-Kommission vom 30.11.2011 zum Prüfungsausschuss und zur Berichterstattung des Abschlussprüfers
  3. Aufgeklärte Mythologie
  4. Jugendleben in stationären Erziehungshilfen Perspektiven von Jugendlichen und Fachkräften im Vergleich
  5. Ärgerregulierung und die Nutzung von (gewalthaltigen) Bildschirmspielen bei Schulkindern
  6. Die Nebenrechte im Musikverlagsvertrag
  7. Sachunterricht für das 21. Jahrhundert - Weltorientierung durch Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung
  8. Incidental jurisdiction in the award in “The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India)” – Part I
  9. Corporate Citizenship als Ordnungsverantwortung
  10. Neue Wirklichkeit von Wohlfahrtsorganisationen - Stellenwert des Verhältnisses
  11. Der rote Faden: Maurice Merleau-Ponty und die Politik der Wahrnehmung
  12. Die Verkehrsdrehscheibe Basel im internationalen Standortwettbewerb
  13. Partnerships for Corporate Sustainability
  14. Landwirtschaft in den Niederlanden zwischen Marktorientierung und Umweltbelastung
  15. Entrepreneurship in the street food sector of Vietnam - Assessment of psychological success and failure factors
  16. Von Zahlenjongleuren, Gelegenheitsabbrechern und Interpretationsmuffeln – Heuristische Lösungsbeispiele zum mathematischen Modellieren
  17. Sagt das Emotionswissen von jungen Kindern ihre phonologische Bewusstheit im Entwicklungsverlauf voraus?
  18. Barbara Piatti: Die Geographie der Literatur
  19. Von Exellenz-Leuchttürmen, Glühwürmchen und anderweitig Erleuchteten
  20. Zugänge zur Bildung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern in der Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung
  21. Streikrecht als Grundrechtsverwirklichung
  22. Außervertragliche Haftung der EG, Haftung für rechtmäßiges Verhalten
  23. The well-being and work-related stress of senior school leaders in Wales and Northern Ireland during COVID-19 "educational leadership crisis"
  24. Cry Baby & Whammy Bar.
  25. Managementaspekte operationeller Risiken
  26. §14 Funktion und Auswahl von Referenzgebieten des europäischen Verwaltungsrechts
  27. Robert Kochs Mikrofotografien
  28. Anarchive künstlerischer Forschung. Vom Umgang mit Archiven experimenteller und forschender Kunst
  29. Die Kunst auf dem Weg in die blaue Ökonomie
  30. Übungsklausur öffentliches Recht
  31. Student Crowd Research
  32. Ordnen, was nicht zu sehen ist
  33. Renditen von Investitionen in fremdsprachliche Fähigkeiten: Eine Untersuchung von Schülerwahrnehmungen und deren Zusammenhang mit ihren Englischkenntnissen
  34. Handlungsmöglichkeiten zur Minderung des Eintrags von Humanarzneimitteln und ihren Rückständen in das Roh- und Trinkwasser
  35. Zusammenfassung und Schlussfolgerungen
  36. Mut zur Weite der Vernunft. Thesen zum Verhältnis von Vernunft, Glaube, der universitas scientiarum und zum Dialog der Kulturen aus reformatorischer Sicht
  37. Zum Umgang mit Zukunft in Organisationen
  38. Familie und Familialität
  39. Erfahrungen und Schlussfolgerungen