Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. / Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana; Leventon, Julia; Lang, Daniel J.
in: Environmental Science and Policy, Jahrgang 136, 01.10.2022, S. 187-197.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Horcea-Milcu AI, Leventon J, Lang DJ. Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. Environmental Science and Policy. 2022 Okt 1;136:187-197. Epub 2022 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

Bibtex

@article{21b240de9dfb4ec6a1bf2916146ab2a6,
title = "Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning",
abstract = "Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.",
keywords = "Co-creation, Co-design, Leverage points, Reflexivity, Sustainability initiatives, Sustainability transformation, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Horcea-Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and Julia Leventon and Lang, {Daniel J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "187--197",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making transdisciplinarity happen

T2 - Phase 0, or before the beginning

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Leventon, Julia

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

AB - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

KW - Co-creation

KW - Co-design

KW - Leverage points

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Sustainability initiatives

KW - Sustainability transformation

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132792818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132792818

VL - 136

SP - 187

EP - 197

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Rezension zu: Nüchter, Oliver et al. (2010): Der Sozialstaat im Urteil der Bevölkerung, Opladen/Farmington Hills
  2. Narratology meets translation studies, or, the voice of the translator in children's literature
  3. Science-Fiction, spekulativer Feminismus und strafkritische Fabulation. Strafabolitionismus mit Ursula K. Le Guins "The Dispossessed".
  4. Schutzauftrag bei Kindeswohlgefährdung (§ 8a SGB VIII) und strafrechtliche Garantenhaftung in der Kinder-und Jugendhilfe
  5. The video microscopy-linked electrochemical cell
  6. Stichwort: Lernzentriertes Leitungshandeln an Schulen – Leadership for Learning
  7. Mediatisierte Politikgestaltung? Medien, Expertise und politische Entscheidungsprozesse in wissenschaftsbasierten Themenfeldern
  8. "Kinder verfügen über ein immenses Expertenwissen."
  9. Auswirkungen einer systemorientierten Bauweise von Windenergieanlagen auf die erzielbaren Börsenpreise
  10. Vermittlung von Sportspielen mithilfe von digital gestützten Lehr- und Lernprozessen
  11. Kulturwissenschaften
  12. Gesprächserziehung im Deutschunterricht. Grunbdlagen und Aufgaben für die Sekundarstufe I
  13. Der RegE für ein Finanzmarktintegritätsstärkungs­gesetz (FISG) – Quo vadis, Corporate Governance?
  14. Die Ebstorfer Weltkarte
  15. Cry Baby & Whammy Bar.
  16. Die Schulordnung als Klang – und Zeit
  17. Kompaktes induktives Energieübertragungssystem mit mehreren Spulen und passivem Spitzenspannungsdetektor für drahtlose Sensorknoten
  18. Organisationskulturen der Aneignung, Fürsorge und Compliance im Bereich der Heimerziehung
  19. Gender, ethnic and class as humour strategies in stand-up comedy of Bovi, Kenny Blaq, Akpororo and Basket Mouth
  20. Der Pressejournalismus als Konstrukteur männlicher Dominanz
  21. Rituals of critique and institutional maintenance at the United Nations climate change summits
  22. Buchbesprechung: Steffen B. Dagger, Energiepolitik & Lobbying
  23. Verbandsklage mit Zähnen? - Zum Vorschlag einer Richtlinie über Verbandsklagen zum Schutz der Kollektivinteressen der Verbraucher
  24. Sozialepidemiologie und Sozialarbeit: Zur Bedeutung und zu den Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten sozialepidemiologischer Forschungsergebnisse in der Sozialen Arbeit
  25. Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management