Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. / Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana; Leventon, Julia; Lang, Daniel J.
in: Environmental Science and Policy, Jahrgang 136, 01.10.2022, S. 187-197.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Horcea-Milcu AI, Leventon J, Lang DJ. Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. Environmental Science and Policy. 2022 Okt 1;136:187-197. Epub 2022 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

Bibtex

@article{21b240de9dfb4ec6a1bf2916146ab2a6,
title = "Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning",
abstract = "Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.",
keywords = "Co-creation, Co-design, Leverage points, Reflexivity, Sustainability initiatives, Sustainability transformation, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Horcea-Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and Julia Leventon and Lang, {Daniel J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "187--197",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making transdisciplinarity happen

T2 - Phase 0, or before the beginning

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Leventon, Julia

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

AB - Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core transdisciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal-typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub-phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.

KW - Co-creation

KW - Co-design

KW - Leverage points

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Sustainability initiatives

KW - Sustainability transformation

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132792818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132792818

VL - 136

SP - 187

EP - 197

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Die Reformvorschläge der EU-Kommission vom 30.11.2011 zum Prüfungsausschuss und zur Berichterstattung des Abschlussprüfers
  2. Auf der Schwelle zur Konsumsoziologie
  3. The video microscopy-linked electrochemical cell
  4. Entrepreneurship in the street food sector of Vietnam - Assessment of psychological success and failure factors
  5. Von Zahlenjongleuren, Gelegenheitsabbrechern und Interpretationsmuffeln – Heuristische Lösungsbeispiele zum mathematischen Modellieren
  6. Streikrecht als Grundrechtsverwirklichung
  7. Stabilität von Raterurteilen über die Zeit, Anpassung an vorhandene Schülerleistungen
  8. Anarchive künstlerischer Forschung. Vom Umgang mit Archiven experimenteller und forschender Kunst
  9. Student Crowd Research
  10. Wirtschaftskriege - Geschichte und Gegenwart
  11. Renditen von Investitionen in fremdsprachliche Fähigkeiten: Eine Untersuchung von Schülerwahrnehmungen und deren Zusammenhang mit ihren Englischkenntnissen
  12. Handlungsmöglichkeiten zur Minderung des Eintrags von Humanarzneimitteln und ihren Rückständen in das Roh- und Trinkwasser
  13. Familie und Familialität
  14. Bildung im Zeichen der globalen Konsumherausforderung
  15. Von Delfinhaut bis Wolfskin
  16. Rechtliche Vorgaben zum Umgang mit Schiffsabwasser
  17. Anwendung des vereinfachten Nachweisverfahrens für Störungen des Bauablaufs in der Praxis
  18. Doing Kinship by Doing Law? Department of European Ethnology, University of Vienna, 9–10 December 2022
  19. Empfehlungen zur Kooperation in transnationalen Projekten der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung im Rahmen der EU-Osterweiterung
  20. Is ecotourism a panacea? Political ecology perspectives from the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India
  21. Einleitung
  22. § 284 Ersatz vergeblicher Aufwendungen
  23. Vergleich der Wärmeabsorption von Gasen
  24. Welches Kontextverständnis braucht der inklusive Nawi-Unterricht?
  25. Rysowanie nicią. Międzynarodowe konteksty teatru plastycznego”
  26. Differenzielle Benotungen von Mädchen und Jungen?
  27. Fazit zum Politikfeld Agro-Gentechnik
  28. Judenbilder und "Literarischer Antisemitismus"
  29. Stützlehrer/innen in außerbetrieblichen Einrichtungen -- Ein (unsichtbarer) Partner zwischen Professionalität und prekärer Beschäftigung
  30. Atmogene Stickstoffeinträge als Ursache für Artenwandel und Artenschwund
  31. "Wissenschaft, Forschung, Ausbildung, Fortbildung"
  32. Didaktische Impulse zum Lehren und Lernen mit und über Künstliche Intelligenz