To use or not to use learning data: A survey study to explain German primary school teachers’ usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef142e6fb54a4bb9855d71322d3d362a,
title = "To use or not to use learning data: A survey study to explain German primary school teachers{\textquoteright} usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization",
abstract = " Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners{\textquoteright} individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents{\textquoteright} current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents{\textquoteright} intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice. ",
keywords = "Psychology, Educational science, Data-Based Decision Making, digital learning platforms, individualization, Learning Analytics, primary school teacher, structural equation modeling, Theory of Planned Behavior",
author = "Hase, {Alina Kristin} and Leonie Kahnbach and Poldi Kuhl and Dirk Lehr",
note = "Funding Information: This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University L{\"u}neburg. This study developed within the CODIP project. CODIP is funded by the Quality Initiative Teacher Training (Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung), a joint initiative of Federal Government and the German states. The financial means were provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Support code: 01JA2002). Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Hase, Kahnbach, Kuhl and Lehr.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.3389/feduc.2022.920498",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Education",
issn = "2504-284X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - To use or not to use learning data

T2 - A survey study to explain German primary school teachers’ usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization

AU - Hase, Alina Kristin

AU - Kahnbach, Leonie

AU - Kuhl, Poldi

AU - Lehr, Dirk

N1 - Funding Information: This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg. This study developed within the CODIP project. CODIP is funded by the Quality Initiative Teacher Training (Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung), a joint initiative of Federal Government and the German states. The financial means were provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Support code: 01JA2002). Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Hase, Kahnbach, Kuhl and Lehr.

PY - 2022/8/18

Y1 - 2022/8/18

N2 - Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners’ individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents’ current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents’ intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice.

AB - Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners’ individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents’ current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents’ intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice.

KW - Psychology

KW - Educational science

KW - Data-Based Decision Making

KW - digital learning platforms

KW - individualization

KW - Learning Analytics

KW - primary school teacher

KW - structural equation modeling

KW - Theory of Planned Behavior

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a0830a45-8b38-341e-a9c7-a683f7bc5d9e/

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137775237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2022.920498

DO - 10.3389/feduc.2022.920498

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Education

JF - Frontiers in Education

SN - 2504-284X

M1 - 920498

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Birgit Többen

Publications

  1. Testing for a break in the persistence in yield spreads of EMU government bonds
  2. Tetrabutylammonium prolinate-based ionic liquids
  3. Race and/as Technology; or, How to do Things to Race
  4. Panel Cointegration Testing in the Presence of a Time Trend
  5. Deciphering Sustainable Consumption: Understanding Motives and Heuristic Cues in the Context of Personal Care Products
  6. Development and reach of a web-based cognitive behavioural therapy programme to reduce symptoms of depression and diabetes-specific distress
  7. Lernsoftware im Unterricht
  8. Ringen um Sinn
  9. An Empirical Note on Religiosity and Social Trust using German Survey Data
  10. Eine Revolution des Begehrens?
  11. Quality of External Communications from the Employee's Perspective
  12. Fast supercritical fluid extraction and high-resolution gas chromatography with electron-capture and flame photometric detection for multiresidue screening of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides in Brazil's medicinal plants
  13. „Das weiß aber oben quasi keiner“.
  14. The impacts of rare disasters on asset returns and risk premiums in advanced economies (1870–2015)
  15. Leere untern Tannenbaum
  16. The Lawless Vitality of Sculpture, c. 1960-80. Formalism’s Monsters, Cybernetic Breakdowns and the Joys of Deviation
  17. Heterogenität, Diversität und Inklusion
  18. Comparing Germany and Israel regarding debates on policy-making at the beginning of life: PGD, NIPT and their paths of routinization
  19. Assessing Collaborative Conservation
  20. Toward a pluralistic conservation science
  21. What are mycorrhizal traits?
  22. Spatial characterization of social-ecological systems units for management in Tropical Dry Forests
  23. Public Finance and Post-Communist Party Development
  24. Dialektik der Umweltinformatik
  25. Sprachunterricht in der Primarstufe