To use or not to use learning data: A survey study to explain German primary school teachers’ usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef142e6fb54a4bb9855d71322d3d362a,
title = "To use or not to use learning data: A survey study to explain German primary school teachers{\textquoteright} usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization",
abstract = " Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners{\textquoteright} individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents{\textquoteright} current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents{\textquoteright} intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice. ",
keywords = "Psychology, Educational science, Data-Based Decision Making, digital learning platforms, individualization, Learning Analytics, primary school teacher, structural equation modeling, Theory of Planned Behavior",
author = "Hase, {Alina Kristin} and Leonie Kahnbach and Poldi Kuhl and Dirk Lehr",
note = "Funding Information: This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University L{\"u}neburg. This study developed within the CODIP project. CODIP is funded by the Quality Initiative Teacher Training (Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung), a joint initiative of Federal Government and the German states. The financial means were provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Support code: 01JA2002). Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Hase, Kahnbach, Kuhl and Lehr.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.3389/feduc.2022.920498",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Education",
issn = "2504-284X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - To use or not to use learning data

T2 - A survey study to explain German primary school teachers’ usage of data from digital learning platforms for purposes of individualization

AU - Hase, Alina Kristin

AU - Kahnbach, Leonie

AU - Kuhl, Poldi

AU - Lehr, Dirk

N1 - Funding Information: This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg. This study developed within the CODIP project. CODIP is funded by the Quality Initiative Teacher Training (Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung), a joint initiative of Federal Government and the German states. The financial means were provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Support code: 01JA2002). Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Hase, Kahnbach, Kuhl and Lehr.

PY - 2022/8/18

Y1 - 2022/8/18

N2 - Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners’ individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents’ current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents’ intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice.

AB - Digital learning platforms (DLP) provide various types of information about student learning when used for learning and practice. This learning data holds potential for individualized instruction, which has become increasingly necessary for adequately addressing learners’ individual needs. For primary schools in particular, this is important for developing inclusive schools. However, despite the potential of DLP and the learning data that can be obtained from them, they are rarely used by teachers. Furthermore, little is known about factors that lead teachers to use learning data for instruction and individual support. To address this research gap, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey study of N = 272 primary school teachers in Germany. After describing the respondents’ current and previous usage of learning data from DLP, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the influence of predictors on respondents’ intention to use as well as their usage of learning data from DLP. Finally, we discuss the need for increased usage of learning data in teacher education and training, contributing to ongoing debates about the usage of digital learning data in educational research and practice.

KW - Psychology

KW - Educational science

KW - Data-Based Decision Making

KW - digital learning platforms

KW - individualization

KW - Learning Analytics

KW - primary school teacher

KW - structural equation modeling

KW - Theory of Planned Behavior

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a0830a45-8b38-341e-a9c7-a683f7bc5d9e/

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137775237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2022.920498

DO - 10.3389/feduc.2022.920498

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Education

JF - Frontiers in Education

SN - 2504-284X

M1 - 920498

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The impact of emotions, moods, and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative
  2. The Effects of Nonindependent Rater Sets in Multilevel–Multitrait–Multimethod Models
  3. Social network activities as a predictor for phase transitions of patients with bipolar affective disorders
  4. Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project
  5. Introduction
  6. Experiments great and small
  7. Cost and schedule overruns in large hydropower dams
  8. Care leavers as helpers
  9. A modified epitope identified for generation and monitoring of PSA-specific T cells in patients on early phases of PSA-based immunotherapeutic protocols
  10. Measurement of vapor pressures of selected PBDEs, hexabromobenzene, and 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane at elevated temperatures
  11. Split-Screen-Gesichter
  12. Green sample preparation focusing on organic analytes in complex matrices
  13. Corrigendum to: Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  14. Incentives Matter, But What Do They Mean? Understanding the Meaning of Market Coordination
  15. Why is there not more demand for redistribution? Cross-national evidence for the role of social justice beliefs
  16. Learning from the richness of diversity
  17. Theoretische Fundierung der Internen Revision
  18. An empirical note on wages in an internal labour market
  19. Digital Workplace Transformation
  20. Die Erinnerung im Gepäck
  21. Von Zahlenmustern zur vollständigen Induktion
  22. Governing the co-production of nature's contributions to people
  23. Verbraucherrechtsdurchsetzung
  24. Beyond Personalization and Anonymity:
  25. Institutional Entrepreneurship