On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture. / Akaliyski, Plamen; Welzel, Christian; Bond, Michael Harris et al.
in: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Jahrgang 52, Nr. 8-9, 10.2021, S. 771-793.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Akaliyski P, Welzel C, Bond MH, Minkov M. On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2021 Okt;52(8-9):771-793. Epub 2021 Sep 11. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/94msk, 10.1177/00220221211044780

Bibtex

@article{4e890b5a1983478494eefc27dec0ec6a,
title = "On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture",
abstract = "Nations have been questioned as meaningful units for analyzing culture due to their allegedly limited variance-capturing power and large internal heterogeneity. Against this skepticism, we argue that culture is by definition a collective phenomenon and focusing on individual differences contradicts the very concept of culture. Through the “miracle of aggregation,” we can eliminate random noise and arbitrary variation at the individual level in order to distill the central cultural tendencies of nations. Accordingly, we depict national culture as a gravitational field that socializes individuals into the orbit of a nation{\textquoteright}s central cultural tendency. Even though individuals are also exposed to other gravitational forces, subcultures in turn gravitate within the limited orbit of their national culture. Using data from the World Values Survey, we show that individual values cluster in concentric circles around their nation{\textquoteright}s cultural gravity center. We reveal the miracle of aggregation by demonstrating that nations capture the bulk of the variation in the individuals{\textquoteright} cultural values once they are aggregated into lower-level territorial units such as towns and sub-national regions. We visualize the gravitational force of national cultures by plotting various intra-national groups from five large countries that form distinct national clusters. Contrary to many scholars{\textquoteright} intuitions, alternative social aggregates, such as ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups, as well as diverse socio-demographic categories, add negligible explained variance to that already captured by nations.",
keywords = "cultural homogeneity, culture, identity, nation, units of analysis, Politics",
author = "Plamen Akaliyski and Christian Welzel and Bond, {Michael Harris} and Michael Minkov",
note = "The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work of the second author was supported by the HSE University Basic Research Program. The work of the fourth author was supported by the HSE University Basic Research Program and the Estonian Research Council Grant Nr: PRG 380. ",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
doi = "10.31235/osf.io/94msk",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "771--793",
journal = "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology",
issn = "0022-0221",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8-9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On “Nationology”

T2 - The Gravitational Field of National Culture

AU - Akaliyski, Plamen

AU - Welzel, Christian

AU - Bond, Michael Harris

AU - Minkov, Michael

N1 - The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work of the second author was supported by the HSE University Basic Research Program. The work of the fourth author was supported by the HSE University Basic Research Program and the Estonian Research Council Grant Nr: PRG 380.

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - Nations have been questioned as meaningful units for analyzing culture due to their allegedly limited variance-capturing power and large internal heterogeneity. Against this skepticism, we argue that culture is by definition a collective phenomenon and focusing on individual differences contradicts the very concept of culture. Through the “miracle of aggregation,” we can eliminate random noise and arbitrary variation at the individual level in order to distill the central cultural tendencies of nations. Accordingly, we depict national culture as a gravitational field that socializes individuals into the orbit of a nation’s central cultural tendency. Even though individuals are also exposed to other gravitational forces, subcultures in turn gravitate within the limited orbit of their national culture. Using data from the World Values Survey, we show that individual values cluster in concentric circles around their nation’s cultural gravity center. We reveal the miracle of aggregation by demonstrating that nations capture the bulk of the variation in the individuals’ cultural values once they are aggregated into lower-level territorial units such as towns and sub-national regions. We visualize the gravitational force of national cultures by plotting various intra-national groups from five large countries that form distinct national clusters. Contrary to many scholars’ intuitions, alternative social aggregates, such as ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups, as well as diverse socio-demographic categories, add negligible explained variance to that already captured by nations.

AB - Nations have been questioned as meaningful units for analyzing culture due to their allegedly limited variance-capturing power and large internal heterogeneity. Against this skepticism, we argue that culture is by definition a collective phenomenon and focusing on individual differences contradicts the very concept of culture. Through the “miracle of aggregation,” we can eliminate random noise and arbitrary variation at the individual level in order to distill the central cultural tendencies of nations. Accordingly, we depict national culture as a gravitational field that socializes individuals into the orbit of a nation’s central cultural tendency. Even though individuals are also exposed to other gravitational forces, subcultures in turn gravitate within the limited orbit of their national culture. Using data from the World Values Survey, we show that individual values cluster in concentric circles around their nation’s cultural gravity center. We reveal the miracle of aggregation by demonstrating that nations capture the bulk of the variation in the individuals’ cultural values once they are aggregated into lower-level territorial units such as towns and sub-national regions. We visualize the gravitational force of national cultures by plotting various intra-national groups from five large countries that form distinct national clusters. Contrary to many scholars’ intuitions, alternative social aggregates, such as ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups, as well as diverse socio-demographic categories, add negligible explained variance to that already captured by nations.

KW - cultural homogeneity

KW - culture

KW - identity

KW - nation

KW - units of analysis

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114741365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1d451b00-30d3-390e-9357-2ac57faacecc/

U2 - 10.31235/osf.io/94msk

DO - 10.31235/osf.io/94msk

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85114741365

VL - 52

SP - 771

EP - 793

JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

SN - 0022-0221

IS - 8-9

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Katrin Heeren

Publikationen

  1. I’m so sorry
  2. Bildung - Studium - Praxis
  3. Leuphana Sommerakademie
  4. Die Rettung des Ontologischen durch das Ontische?
  5. Internationale Arbeitsteilung und intersektorale Verknüpfung im Spektrum von Markt und Hierarchie
  6. Globalisation Gangnam-style
  7. Nicht nur Theologen schreiben Bücher über die Sintflut
  8. A CULTure of entrepreneurship education
  9. Forschungsförderung unter dem Aspekt transdisziplinärer Integrationsaufgaben
  10. Stakeholder Governance
  11. Die romantische »Theorie des Romans«
  12. Prison Vocational Education and Policy in the United States:
  13. Success among self-initiated versus assigned expatriates
  14. On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology
  15. Charakteristika des Modellgebietes Lüneburger Heide
  16. Alltag in den Medien - Medien im Alltag
  17. Wettbewerbs- und Subventionsrecht im Handels- und Zusammenarbeitsabkommen EU/VK
  18. Arbeitgeberverhalten in der Wirtschaftskrise
  19. Begleitetes Sterben als gesellschaftliches Phänomen
  20. Mündlichkeit fördern und bewerten
  21. Das Reden der Neulinge und andere Sünden
  22. Von der Bundes-Rahmenordnung zu einer Modulkonzeption für die Soziale Arbeit
  23. Coaching-Kristallmodell – Coaching Tool Collection mit Materialien
  24. Klimaanpassung – (k)ein Thema in umweltrelevanten Bildungsorganisationen?
  25. VwGO §44a [Rechtsbehelfe gegen behördliche Verfahrenshandlungen]
  26. Innovation durch Nachhaltiges Wirt­schaften
  27. Radverkehrsförderung 3.0 – eine Zwischenbilanz
  28. Name ohne Eigenschaften
  29. "!!Fach-an-Sprache-an-Fach!!"
  30. Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien
  31. Partizipation von Kindern und Jugendlichen
  32. Ökologie
  33. Bestandsaufnahme und Würdigung der empirischen Rechnungslegungsforschung zum Goodwill Impairment Only Approach nach IFRS
  34. Krieg zum Mitspielen
  35. Bildungsstandards praktisch
  36. Innovation und Evolution von Geschäftsmodellen dargestellt am Beispiel BP Solar