A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science. / Frank, Elisabeth; Mühlhaus, Rike; Mustelin, Katinka Malena et al.
in: Sustainability Science, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 4, 07.2024, S. 1459-1480.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

Frank, E, Mühlhaus, R, Mustelin, KM, Trilken, EL, Kreuz, NK, Bowes, LC, Backer, LM & von Wehrden, H 2024, 'A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science', Sustainability Science, Jg. 19, Nr. 4, S. 1459-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5

APA

Frank, E., Mühlhaus, R., Mustelin, K. M., Trilken, E. L., Kreuz, N. K., Bowes, L. C., Backer, L. M., & von Wehrden, H. (2024). A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 19(4), 1459-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5

Vancouver

Frank E, Mühlhaus R, Mustelin KM, Trilken EL, Kreuz NK, Bowes LC et al. A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science. Sustainability Science. 2024 Jul;19(4):1459-1480. doi: 10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5

Bibtex

@article{8853c71ee6ac402a8b905deb5267695f,
title = "A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science",
abstract = "We conducted a systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature that specifically focuses on the combination of sustainability and gender. We analyzed the existing peer-reviewed research regarding the extent to which gender plays a role in the empirical literature, how this is methodologically collected and what understanding of gender is applied in those articles. Our aim is to provide an overview of the current most common fields of research and thus show in which areas gender is already being included in the sustainability sciences and to what extent and in which areas this inclusion has not yet taken place or has only taken place to a limited extent. We identified 1054 papers that matched our criteria and conducted research on at least one sustainable development goal and gender research. Within these papers (i), the overall number of countries where lead authors were located was very high (91 countries). While the majority of lead authors were located in the Global North, less than a third of the articles were led by authors located in the Global South. Furthermore, gender is often just used as a category of empirical analysis rather than a research focus. We were able to identify (ii) a lack in coherent framing of relevant terms. Often no definition of sustainability was given, and only the sustainability goals (SDGs or MDGs) were used as a framework to refer to sustainability. Both gender and sustainability were often used as key words without being specifically addressed. Concerning the knowledge types of sustainability, our expectation that system knowledge dominates the literature was confirmed. While a problem orientation dominates much of the discourse, only a few papers focus on normative or transformative knowledge. (iii) Furthermore, the investigated literature was mainly contributing to few SDGs, with SDG 5 {\textquoteleft}Gender Equality{\textquoteright} accounting for 83% of all contributions, followed by SDG 8 {\textquoteleft}Decent Work and Economic Growth{\textquoteright} (21%), SDG 3 {\textquoteleft}Good Health and Well-being{\textquoteright} (15%) and SDG 4 {\textquoteleft}Quality Education{\textquoteright} (12%). We were additionally able to identify seven research clusters in the landscape of gender in sustainability science. (iv) A broad range of diverse methods was utilized that allow us to approximate different forms of knowledge. Yet within different research clusters, the spectrum of methodologies is rather homogeneous. (v) Overall, in most papers gender is conceptualized in binary terms. In most cases, the research is explicitly about women, running the risk that gender research in sustainability sciences grows into a synonym for women's studies.",
keywords = "Gender studies, Sustainability, Sustainable development goals, Womens studies, Sustainability education, Sustainability sciences, Communication",
author = "Elisabeth Frank and Rike M{\"u}hlhaus and Mustelin, {Katinka Malena} and Trilken, {Esther Lara} and Kreuz, {Noemi Katalin} and Bowes, {Linda Catharine} and Backer, {Lina Marie} and {von Wehrden}, Henrik",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1459--1480",
journal = "Sustainability Science",
issn = "1862-4065",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of peer-reviewed gender literature in sustainability science

AU - Frank, Elisabeth

AU - Mühlhaus, Rike

AU - Mustelin, Katinka Malena

AU - Trilken, Esther Lara

AU - Kreuz, Noemi Katalin

AU - Bowes, Linda Catharine

AU - Backer, Lina Marie

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/7

Y1 - 2024/7

N2 - We conducted a systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature that specifically focuses on the combination of sustainability and gender. We analyzed the existing peer-reviewed research regarding the extent to which gender plays a role in the empirical literature, how this is methodologically collected and what understanding of gender is applied in those articles. Our aim is to provide an overview of the current most common fields of research and thus show in which areas gender is already being included in the sustainability sciences and to what extent and in which areas this inclusion has not yet taken place or has only taken place to a limited extent. We identified 1054 papers that matched our criteria and conducted research on at least one sustainable development goal and gender research. Within these papers (i), the overall number of countries where lead authors were located was very high (91 countries). While the majority of lead authors were located in the Global North, less than a third of the articles were led by authors located in the Global South. Furthermore, gender is often just used as a category of empirical analysis rather than a research focus. We were able to identify (ii) a lack in coherent framing of relevant terms. Often no definition of sustainability was given, and only the sustainability goals (SDGs or MDGs) were used as a framework to refer to sustainability. Both gender and sustainability were often used as key words without being specifically addressed. Concerning the knowledge types of sustainability, our expectation that system knowledge dominates the literature was confirmed. While a problem orientation dominates much of the discourse, only a few papers focus on normative or transformative knowledge. (iii) Furthermore, the investigated literature was mainly contributing to few SDGs, with SDG 5 ‘Gender Equality’ accounting for 83% of all contributions, followed by SDG 8 ‘Decent Work and Economic Growth’ (21%), SDG 3 ‘Good Health and Well-being’ (15%) and SDG 4 ‘Quality Education’ (12%). We were additionally able to identify seven research clusters in the landscape of gender in sustainability science. (iv) A broad range of diverse methods was utilized that allow us to approximate different forms of knowledge. Yet within different research clusters, the spectrum of methodologies is rather homogeneous. (v) Overall, in most papers gender is conceptualized in binary terms. In most cases, the research is explicitly about women, running the risk that gender research in sustainability sciences grows into a synonym for women's studies.

AB - We conducted a systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature that specifically focuses on the combination of sustainability and gender. We analyzed the existing peer-reviewed research regarding the extent to which gender plays a role in the empirical literature, how this is methodologically collected and what understanding of gender is applied in those articles. Our aim is to provide an overview of the current most common fields of research and thus show in which areas gender is already being included in the sustainability sciences and to what extent and in which areas this inclusion has not yet taken place or has only taken place to a limited extent. We identified 1054 papers that matched our criteria and conducted research on at least one sustainable development goal and gender research. Within these papers (i), the overall number of countries where lead authors were located was very high (91 countries). While the majority of lead authors were located in the Global North, less than a third of the articles were led by authors located in the Global South. Furthermore, gender is often just used as a category of empirical analysis rather than a research focus. We were able to identify (ii) a lack in coherent framing of relevant terms. Often no definition of sustainability was given, and only the sustainability goals (SDGs or MDGs) were used as a framework to refer to sustainability. Both gender and sustainability were often used as key words without being specifically addressed. Concerning the knowledge types of sustainability, our expectation that system knowledge dominates the literature was confirmed. While a problem orientation dominates much of the discourse, only a few papers focus on normative or transformative knowledge. (iii) Furthermore, the investigated literature was mainly contributing to few SDGs, with SDG 5 ‘Gender Equality’ accounting for 83% of all contributions, followed by SDG 8 ‘Decent Work and Economic Growth’ (21%), SDG 3 ‘Good Health and Well-being’ (15%) and SDG 4 ‘Quality Education’ (12%). We were additionally able to identify seven research clusters in the landscape of gender in sustainability science. (iv) A broad range of diverse methods was utilized that allow us to approximate different forms of knowledge. Yet within different research clusters, the spectrum of methodologies is rather homogeneous. (v) Overall, in most papers gender is conceptualized in binary terms. In most cases, the research is explicitly about women, running the risk that gender research in sustainability sciences grows into a synonym for women's studies.

KW - Gender studies

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable development goals

KW - Womens studies

KW - Sustainability education

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196042831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1658f44c-d0ac-36f1-bd7a-5aafdf701ce5/

U2 - 10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5

DO - 10.1007/s11625-024-01514-5

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85196042831

VL - 19

SP - 1459

EP - 1480

JO - Sustainability Science

JF - Sustainability Science

SN - 1862-4065

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Aktivierung von Studierenden im Inverted Classroom - neue Möglichkeiten für die Lehre der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
  2. Coastal Tourism in Germany
  3. Fahndungssendungen im deutschsprachigen Fernsehen
  4. Wahlsystemwandel in Mittelosteuropa
  5. Redefinition der Wertschöpfungskette von Versicherungsunternehmen : Bewertungsmodell zur Entscheidungsunterstützung bei der Disaggregation der Wertschöpfungskette am Beispiel kleiner und mittlerer Versicherungsunternehmen
  6. Die Weiterbildung der Weiterbildner
  7. Dekonstruktion des "Anderen" in Ethnologie und Soziologie
  8. Umschaffen umdenken
  9. Tourism demand and trends in the Baltic Sea Region
  10. Da Capo Al Segno
  11. Von Lebensträumen und prekären Verhältnissen...
  12. Populäre Musik
  13. Tragen Unabhängigkeit und Expertise im Prüfungsausschuss bei börsennotierten Aktiengesellschaften zu erhöhten Nachhaltigkeitsaktivitäten bei?
  14. Hermann Bahr - Studien zur Kritik der Moderne
  15. "Ethical Standards for International Judges"
  16. Keine vergaberechtsfreie Zusammenarbeit zwischen öffentlichen Auftraggebern bei bloßer Leistung gegen Kostenerstattung
  17. Neue Wege für Jungs – Das Ende der Normalarbeitsbiographie und Konsequenzen für Konzepte in der Arbeit zu beruflichen Übergängen und Bewältigungsaufgaben für chancenarme junge Männer.
  18. Lernaufgaben aus fachdidaktischen Perspektiven
  19. Beteiligungs- und Beschwerdemanagement in der Inobhutnahme
  20. Parteienregierungen in Mittel- und Osteuropa
  21. Hermann Bahr - Zur Kritik der Moderne
  22. Herausforderungen für die Theoriebildung in der Familiensoziologie
  23. "Produktive Zerstörung"
  24. Zur Verortung des Bösen in der Kinder- und Jugendliteratur
  25. Handel mit Treibhausgas-Emissionszertifikaten in der EG
  26. Kinder- und Jugendliteratur
  27. Erste Erfahrungen mit der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung und -prüfung
  28. Paarbeziehung und Familie als vertragsförmige Institutionen?
  29. Recht und Europa
  30. Demographischer Wandel und Konsumentenverhalten im Tourismus
  31. Konzeptionelle Zugänge zur Konstruktion nachhaltig ausgerichteter situationsorientierter Lernaufgaben für betriebliche Arbeits- und Lernsituationen
  32. Editorische Notizen - Einblicke in die Kommunikation über Nachhaltigkeit
  33. Äquivalenz von Kompetenzmessungen in Schulleistungsstudien
  34. Der historische Pygmalioneffekt der Lehrergenerationen im Bildungswachstum von 1884 bis 1993
  35. Musikwirtschaft 2.0. Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven
  36. Bildung und Schule im Spannungsfeld pandemiebedingter Herausforderungen
  37. Grupp, Hariolf ( 1997). Messung und Erklärung des Technischen Wandels. Grundzüge einer empirischen Innovationsökonomik. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. 497 S. DM 59.00. ISBN 3-540-63155-0.