The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness. / Fischer, Sebastian; Frese, Michael; Mertins, Jennifer Clarissa et al.
In: Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 428-453.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fischer S, Frese M, Mertins JC, Hardt-Gawron JV. The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness. Applied Psychology. 2018 Jul 1;67(3):428-453. Epub 2018 Jan 16. doi: 10.1111/apps.12129

Bibtex

@article{e1962689f3b746ea8a055bb1f926afd1,
title = "The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness",
abstract = "To innovate at work is risky as every new endeavour is also error-prone. Therefore, the way errors are managed in organisations may be related to organisations' innovativeness. We studied error management culture as one important and often overlooked organisational culture factor hypothesised to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Error management culture implies that a firm accepts that people make errors and uses “organizational practices related to communicating about errors, to sharing error knowledge, to helping in error situations, and to quickly detecting and handling errors” to deal with errors (Van Dyck, Frese, Baer, & Sonnentag, p. 1229). Our sample consists of 30 companies with N = 227 employees. To decrease the problem of common method variance, we split the samples within each company into two subsamples: one subsample was used for the measurement of error management culture and the other one for the measure of organisational innovativeness. A multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) analysis showed error management culture to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Organisational innovativeness was a mediator for the relationship between error management culture and individual innovativeness. A potential implication is that organisations wanting to increase their innovativeness may need to examine their error management culture.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship, Business psychology, employee, human, major clinical study, measurement error, mediator, organizational culture, structural equation modeling",
author = "Sebastian Fischer and Michael Frese and Mertins, {Jennifer Clarissa} and Hardt-Gawron, {Julia Verena}",
note = "Address for correspondence: Dr Sebastian Fischer, Department of Management and Organisation, Leuphana, University of Lueneburg, Germany. Email: Sebastian.fsc@gmail.com Thanks for partial support for writing this article by Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (R-317-000-123-112) as well as by German Research Foundation (FR638/38-1 Learning from errors and error management in organizations: Conditions, processes, and effects).",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/apps.12129",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "428--453",
journal = "Applied Psychology",
issn = "0269-994X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness

AU - Fischer, Sebastian

AU - Frese, Michael

AU - Mertins, Jennifer Clarissa

AU - Hardt-Gawron, Julia Verena

N1 - Address for correspondence: Dr Sebastian Fischer, Department of Management and Organisation, Leuphana, University of Lueneburg, Germany. Email: Sebastian.fsc@gmail.com Thanks for partial support for writing this article by Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (R-317-000-123-112) as well as by German Research Foundation (FR638/38-1 Learning from errors and error management in organizations: Conditions, processes, and effects).

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - To innovate at work is risky as every new endeavour is also error-prone. Therefore, the way errors are managed in organisations may be related to organisations' innovativeness. We studied error management culture as one important and often overlooked organisational culture factor hypothesised to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Error management culture implies that a firm accepts that people make errors and uses “organizational practices related to communicating about errors, to sharing error knowledge, to helping in error situations, and to quickly detecting and handling errors” to deal with errors (Van Dyck, Frese, Baer, & Sonnentag, p. 1229). Our sample consists of 30 companies with N = 227 employees. To decrease the problem of common method variance, we split the samples within each company into two subsamples: one subsample was used for the measurement of error management culture and the other one for the measure of organisational innovativeness. A multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) analysis showed error management culture to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Organisational innovativeness was a mediator for the relationship between error management culture and individual innovativeness. A potential implication is that organisations wanting to increase their innovativeness may need to examine their error management culture.

AB - To innovate at work is risky as every new endeavour is also error-prone. Therefore, the way errors are managed in organisations may be related to organisations' innovativeness. We studied error management culture as one important and often overlooked organisational culture factor hypothesised to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Error management culture implies that a firm accepts that people make errors and uses “organizational practices related to communicating about errors, to sharing error knowledge, to helping in error situations, and to quickly detecting and handling errors” to deal with errors (Van Dyck, Frese, Baer, & Sonnentag, p. 1229). Our sample consists of 30 companies with N = 227 employees. To decrease the problem of common method variance, we split the samples within each company into two subsamples: one subsample was used for the measurement of error management culture and the other one for the measure of organisational innovativeness. A multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) analysis showed error management culture to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Organisational innovativeness was a mediator for the relationship between error management culture and individual innovativeness. A potential implication is that organisations wanting to increase their innovativeness may need to examine their error management culture.

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Business psychology

KW - employee

KW - human

KW - major clinical study

KW - measurement error

KW - mediator

KW - organizational culture

KW - structural equation modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048774515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apps.12129

DO - 10.1111/apps.12129

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 67

SP - 428

EP - 453

JO - Applied Psychology

JF - Applied Psychology

SN - 0269-994X

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Katrin Heeren

Publications

  1. Habitat preferences of the Levant Green Lizard, Lacerta media israelica (Peters, 1964)
  2. I’m so sorry
  3. Bildung - Studium - Praxis
  4. Leuphana Sommerakademie
  5. Die Rettung des Ontologischen durch das Ontische?
  6. Internationale Arbeitsteilung und intersektorale Verknüpfung im Spektrum von Markt und Hierarchie
  7. Globalisation Gangnam-style
  8. Nicht nur Theologen schreiben Bücher über die Sintflut
  9. A CULTure of entrepreneurship education
  10. Forschungsförderung unter dem Aspekt transdisziplinärer Integrationsaufgaben
  11. Stakeholder Governance
  12. Die romantische »Theorie des Romans«
  13. Prison Vocational Education and Policy in the United States:
  14. Success among self-initiated versus assigned expatriates
  15. On the origins of Kierkegaard's climacus writings and paradox christology
  16. Charakteristika des Modellgebietes Lüneburger Heide
  17. Alltag in den Medien - Medien im Alltag
  18. Wettbewerbs- und Subventionsrecht im Handels- und Zusammenarbeitsabkommen EU/VK
  19. Arbeitgeberverhalten in der Wirtschaftskrise
  20. Begleitetes Sterben als gesellschaftliches Phänomen
  21. Mündlichkeit fördern und bewerten
  22. Das Reden der Neulinge und andere Sünden
  23. Von der Bundes-Rahmenordnung zu einer Modulkonzeption für die Soziale Arbeit
  24. Coaching-Kristallmodell – Coaching Tool Collection mit Materialien
  25. Klimaanpassung – (k)ein Thema in umweltrelevanten Bildungsorganisationen?
  26. VwGO §44a [Rechtsbehelfe gegen behördliche Verfahrenshandlungen]
  27. Innovation durch Nachhaltiges Wirt­schaften
  28. Radverkehrsförderung 3.0 – eine Zwischenbilanz
  29. Name ohne Eigenschaften
  30. "!!Fach-an-Sprache-an-Fach!!"
  31. Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien
  32. Partizipation von Kindern und Jugendlichen
  33. Ökologie
  34. Bestandsaufnahme und Würdigung der empirischen Rechnungslegungsforschung zum Goodwill Impairment Only Approach nach IFRS
  35. Krieg zum Mitspielen
  36. Bildungsstandards praktisch
  37. Innovation und Evolution von Geschäftsmodellen dargestellt am Beispiel BP Solar