Meaning-making in higher education for sustainable development: Undergraduates’ long-term processes of experiencing and learning

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{87590b5c788340e8b285361de5c46ce6,
title = "Meaning-making in higher education for sustainable development: Undergraduates{\textquoteright} long-term processes of experiencing and learning",
abstract = "Despite the increase in teaching approaches designed to integrate sustainability into higher education, the connection between students{\textquoteright} learning experiences and their learning outcomes remains incompletely understood. The present multi-case study complements the discussion by investigating undergraduates{\textquoteright} long-term meaning-making processes using the theoretical lens of significant learning and process analysis of students{\textquoteright} learning experience. Based on in-depth narrative interviews with 10 students at the end of a three-year study program, we analyzed how and why learning experiences become significant, differentiating perceived personal impact and the subjective value assigned to these experiences. We identified three types of sustainability-related meaning-making processes, ranging from no sustainability-related meaning-making to meaning-making as self-realization. The differentiated view on how meaning-making mediates students{\textquoteright} sustainability-related learning experiences and their learning outcomes enhances our understanding of the specific dynamics that may shape the how and why of significant learning. It thus supports the tailored curriculum design for integrating sustainability into higher education.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Sustainability education, Significant learning, higher education for sustainable development, meaning-making, narrative interviews, process analysis, learning experiences",
author = "Anna Sundermann and Annika Weiser and Matthias Barth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/13504622.2022.2069679",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1616--1634",
journal = "Environmental Education Research",
issn = "1350-4622",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaning-making in higher education for sustainable development

T2 - Undergraduates’ long-term processes of experiencing and learning

AU - Sundermann, Anna

AU - Weiser, Annika

AU - Barth, Matthias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022/10/10

Y1 - 2022/10/10

N2 - Despite the increase in teaching approaches designed to integrate sustainability into higher education, the connection between students’ learning experiences and their learning outcomes remains incompletely understood. The present multi-case study complements the discussion by investigating undergraduates’ long-term meaning-making processes using the theoretical lens of significant learning and process analysis of students’ learning experience. Based on in-depth narrative interviews with 10 students at the end of a three-year study program, we analyzed how and why learning experiences become significant, differentiating perceived personal impact and the subjective value assigned to these experiences. We identified three types of sustainability-related meaning-making processes, ranging from no sustainability-related meaning-making to meaning-making as self-realization. The differentiated view on how meaning-making mediates students’ sustainability-related learning experiences and their learning outcomes enhances our understanding of the specific dynamics that may shape the how and why of significant learning. It thus supports the tailored curriculum design for integrating sustainability into higher education.

AB - Despite the increase in teaching approaches designed to integrate sustainability into higher education, the connection between students’ learning experiences and their learning outcomes remains incompletely understood. The present multi-case study complements the discussion by investigating undergraduates’ long-term meaning-making processes using the theoretical lens of significant learning and process analysis of students’ learning experience. Based on in-depth narrative interviews with 10 students at the end of a three-year study program, we analyzed how and why learning experiences become significant, differentiating perceived personal impact and the subjective value assigned to these experiences. We identified three types of sustainability-related meaning-making processes, ranging from no sustainability-related meaning-making to meaning-making as self-realization. The differentiated view on how meaning-making mediates students’ sustainability-related learning experiences and their learning outcomes enhances our understanding of the specific dynamics that may shape the how and why of significant learning. It thus supports the tailored curriculum design for integrating sustainability into higher education.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Sustainability education

KW - Significant learning

KW - higher education for sustainable development

KW - meaning-making

KW - narrative interviews

KW - process analysis

KW - learning experiences

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5f33a662-2a65-33c6-98cd-12927591f2f0/

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132663601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13504622.2022.2069679

DO - 10.1080/13504622.2022.2069679

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 28

SP - 1616

EP - 1634

JO - Environmental Education Research

JF - Environmental Education Research

SN - 1350-4622

IS - 11

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The Influence of Personality on Career Decisiveness of Business Students
  2. Spatial distribution models in a frugivorous carnivore, the stone marten (Martes foina)
  3. Medienerziehung in der Kindertagesstätte
  4. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (ed. Heidi Maibom), Routledge, 2017
  5. Correction
  6. Schichten und der Zwischenraum
  7. Rong Wongsawan’s Gonzo Journey through California in 1976
  8. MSPs for the SDGs
  9. Flexible transitions from work to retirement in Germany
  10. Greene’s dual-process moral psychology and the modularity of mind
  11. Detection of up to 65% of precancerous lesions of the human colon and rectum by mutation analysis of APC, K-Ras, B-Raf and CTNNB1.
  12. Are rational expectations equilibria with private information eductively stable?
  13. Das Datenhandeln
  14. Auf dem Weg zu einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung von Organisationsentwicklungsprojekten an Hochschulen
  15. Climate change and society - communicating adaptation
  16. Sustainability Management Control
  17. "You Are The Only Person In This Conference"
  18. § 35 Republik Malta
  19. Handbuch Erlebnispädagogik
  20. Mathematik für Wirtschaftsinformatik
  21. Innovative Lehre - Grundsätze, Konzepte, Beispiele der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
  22. Füreinander Sprechen. Zu einer feministischen Theorie der Repräsentation
  23. Impulse für eine stadtverträgliche Mobilität
  24. Emission pathways towards a low-carbon energy system for Europe:
  25. Nascent entrepreneurs
  26. Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung
  27. Rezension Chris Porter, 2019, Supporter Ownership in English Football
  28. Editorial
  29. Aufmerksamkeit in optischen Flußfeldern
  30. Das transdisziplinäre Lehrforschungsprojekt “Leben 2014”
  31. A Theory of the Corporate Decision to Resist FASB Standards
  32. Nomadische Treibhäuser
  33. Transdisciplinarity
  34. Erzählen - Argumentieren - Beschreiben
  35. Predicting academic success with the big 5 rated from different points of view: Self-rated, other rated and faked
  36. Topophilie
  37. Popförderung in der Stadt