Empowered or informed? Seeking to mitigate gender differences in first-offer assertiveness through pre-negotiation interventions

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Gender differences in negotiation behavior—for instance, men's vs. women's likelihood to make (assertive) first offers—contribute to the globally prevalent gender pay gap (GPG). In an attempt to mitigate the social and economic consequences of this gender disparity, we first empirically validated two pre-negotiation message interventions in a pilot study (N = 203). In the main experimental intervention study (N = 585), male versus female participants randomly received this (1) informative message about the GPG, or (2) gender-specific empowering message, or (3) no message in the control condition. In a subsequent negotiation task on the starting salary for a new job, we assessed participants’ (a) likelihood-to-initiate a first offer and (b) first-offer assertiveness. Results showed a remarkably robust behavioral gender disparity: across all conditions, men were more likely to make the first offer (d = 0.178) and made them more assertively (d = 0.339). Importantly, compared to the control condition, the informative (dinform = 0.304) and the empowering (dempower = 0.255) pre-negotiation interventions increased women's first-offer assertiveness. Similar intervention benefits emerged for men (dinform = 0.259; dempower = 0.284), however, yielding an overall remarkably robust gender difference. To explore the underlying reasons for this gender disparity, we tested four competing psychological mechanisms (i.e., self-esteem, positive and negative affect, GPG awareness, and self-efficacy). Our results highlight the impact that even short, minimal interventions can have on gender differences in negotiation behavior and illustrate which psychological mechanisms explain the emergence of gender disparity in the first place.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102775
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume105
Number of pages11
ISSN0167-4870
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.12.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Can we trust a chatbot like a physician? A qualitative study on understanding the emergence of trust toward diagnostic chatbots
  2. Tree diversity promotes functional dissimilarity and maintains functional richness despite species loss in predator assemblages
  3. Second comment on 'The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions'
  4. Rezension von Kleger/ Karolewski/ Munke 2001: Europäische Verfassung. Zum Stand der europäischen Demokratie im Zuge der Osterweiterung
  5. The use of player physical and technical skill match activity profiles to predict position in the Australian Football League draft
  6. Analysis of semi-open queueing networks using lost customers approximation with an application to robotic mobile fulfilment systems
  7. EVALUATION FORM FOR TRAINEES AS A HUMAN-RESOURCE DATA INSTRUMENT - SUGGESTIONS FOR ITS CONSTRUCTION AND RESULTS OF AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY
  8. Frey, Bruno S. (1997). Ein neuer Föderalismus für Europa. Die Idee der FOCJ. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 101 S. DM 64.00. ISBN 3-16-146790-6.
  9. Pathways of Conflict: Lessons from the Cultivation of MON810 in Germany in 2005–2008 for Emerging Conflicts over New Breeding Techniques
  10. Entwicklung eines Lehrkonzepts zur Implementierung von Medien für einen digital-gestützten Deutschunterricht im berufsbildenden Lehramt
  11. Disentangling associations of human wellbeing with green infrastructure, degree of urbanity, and social factors around an Asian megacity
  12. Grundlage allen Wirtschaftens. Care: feministische Kritik an den marktwirtschaftlichen Verwertungszwängen von Sorge- und Versorgungsarbeit
  13. Methodenmanagement in der Unternehmensberatung - Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung in einem internationalen IT-Beratungsunternehmen