Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. / Tropper, Natalie; Leiß, Dominik; Hänze, Martin.
in: ZDM, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 7, 11.2015, S. 1225-1240.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5bee3b437a6d493d93c14cf133c0d007,
title = "Teachers{\textquoteright} temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling",
abstract = "Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students{\textquoteright} modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers{\textquoteright} adaptations to students{\textquoteright} needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students{\textquoteright} interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students{\textquoteright} handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers{\textquoteright} individual support during students{\textquoteright} processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments. ",
keywords = "Didactics of Mathematics, Modellieren, Scaffolding, L{\"o}sungsbeispiele, Adaptive teaching, Mathematical modeling, Scaffolding, Worked-out examples",
author = "Natalie Tropper and Dominik Lei{\ss} and Martin H{\"a}nze",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1225--1240",
journal = "ZDM",
issn = "1863-9690",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

AU - Tropper, Natalie

AU - Leiß, Dominik

AU - Hänze, Martin

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

AB - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

KW - Didactics of Mathematics

KW - Modellieren

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Lösungsbeispiele

KW - Adaptive teaching

KW - Mathematical modeling

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Worked-out examples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947447045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

DO - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 47

SP - 1225

EP - 1240

JO - ZDM

JF - ZDM

SN - 1863-9690

IS - 7

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Intra-firm Wage Dispersion and Cost Coverage of Training: Evidence from German Linked Employer-Employee Data
  2. Moral responsibility, motivational crowding, and efficient regulation of externalities
  3. Robust Current Decoupling in a Permanent Magnet Motor Combining a Geometric Method and SMC
  4. Plenary lecture eintitled: "Mathematical insights for advanced ice-clamping control in the context of Industry 4.0"
  5. Leveraging digital affordances to make language learning stick
  6. 19th Annual SemFest
  7. The link between supervisory board reporting and firm performance in Germany and Austria
  8. Common Ground #3. Where the Circles Intersect
  9. Does resin represent a neglected component of bee ecology? A comparison between Old and New World bees.
  10. Ars Electronica
  11. Towards an Undercommons (Eco)Logistics?
  12. The Use of Media in Intercultural Dialogue "dialogo_dialog"!: Investigation of a Research Event in Terms of Communication without Language
  13. Life cycle thinking and systems thinking - how to support systems thinking in material flow management
  14. Hyperkult XXV - 2015
  15. RHYTHMS OF ATTUNEMENT
  16. Workshop "Biodiversity and pollination services – from basic and applied science to stakeholders and policy" 2012
  17. 1st ECPR Winter School in Methods and Techniques 2012
  18. Process Tracing Methodology - 2011
  19. „Don't forget: the archive!“ – Collecting Non-Archives for the Post-Media Condition - 2013
  20. Crazy, Classified City Life - Hackfeminist Future-Making Practices between Dystopia and Utopia, Predictability and Possibility
  21. Campusemerge 2011

Publikationen

  1. Explorations in social spaces
  2. Evaluating the effectiveness of retention forestry to enhance biodiversity in production forests of Central Europe using an interdisciplinary, multi-scale approach
  3. Do abundance distributions and species aggregation correctly predict macroecological biodiversity patterns in tropical forests?
  4. Conceptualizing community in energy systems
  5. Applied Conversation Analysis in Foreign Language Didactics
  6. Understanding and managing post-acquisition integration as change process
  7. Internet-based public debate of CCS
  8. Introduction
  9. Influence of data clouds fusion from 3D real-time vision system on robotic group dead reckoning in unknown terrain
  10. The Crowd in Flux
  11. Exchanging Knowledge and Good Practices of Education for Sustainable Development within a Global Student Organization (oikos)
  12. Finite element modeling of laser beam welding for residual stress calculation
  13. Modeling Grounding Processes in Chat-based CSCL
  14. Embedded, not plugged-in
  15. On the Direct Kinematics Problem of Parallel Mechanisms
  16. Vom „rights-based approach" zum "solution-based approach" in der WTO-Streitbeilegung?
  17. Digital teaching as an instrument for cross-location teaching networks in medical informatics
  18. Discussion report part 2
  19. Action rate models for predicting actions in soccer
  20. An EKF-based observer for sensorless valve control in camless internal combustion engine
  21. Optimal control strategies for PMSM with a decoupling super twisting SMC and inductance estimation in the presence of saturation
  22. Perfectly nested or significantly nested - an important difference for conservation management
  23. Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services
  24. A Two-Stage Sliding-Mode High-Gain Observer to Reduce Uncertainties and Disturbances Effects for Sensorless Control in Automotive Applications
  25. Discourse, practice, policy and organizing