Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. / Tropper, Natalie; Leiß, Dominik; Hänze, Martin.
In: ZDM, Vol. 47, No. 7, 11.2015, p. 1225-1240.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5bee3b437a6d493d93c14cf133c0d007,
title = "Teachers{\textquoteright} temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling",
abstract = "Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students{\textquoteright} modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers{\textquoteright} adaptations to students{\textquoteright} needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students{\textquoteright} interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students{\textquoteright} handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers{\textquoteright} individual support during students{\textquoteright} processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments. ",
keywords = "Didactics of Mathematics, Modellieren, Scaffolding, L{\"o}sungsbeispiele, Adaptive teaching, Mathematical modeling, Scaffolding, Worked-out examples",
author = "Natalie Tropper and Dominik Lei{\ss} and Martin H{\"a}nze",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1225--1240",
journal = "ZDM",
issn = "1863-9690",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

AU - Tropper, Natalie

AU - Leiß, Dominik

AU - Hänze, Martin

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

AB - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

KW - Didactics of Mathematics

KW - Modellieren

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Lösungsbeispiele

KW - Adaptive teaching

KW - Mathematical modeling

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Worked-out examples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947447045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

DO - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 47

SP - 1225

EP - 1240

JO - ZDM

JF - ZDM

SN - 1863-9690

IS - 7

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations
  2. Efficacy of a Web-Based Intervention With Mobile Phone Support in Treating Depressive Symptoms in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
  3. Industry 4.0 more than a challenge in modeling, identification, and control for cyber-physical systems
  4. Using Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Occupational Health Services in Small and Microenterprises
  5. Differentiating forest types using TerraSAR–X spotlight images based on inferential statistics and multivariate analysis
  6. Grounds different from, though equally solid with
  7. On the Appropriate Methodologies for Data Science Projects
  8. An innovative efficiency of incubator to enhance organization supportive business using machine learning approach
  9. Complexity and Administrative Intensity
  10. Knowledge integration
  11. Enhanced Calculation Procedures for Material and Energy Flow Oriented EMIS
  12. Modellieren in der Sekundarstufe
  13. Unveiling local knowledge
  14. Master of Disaster: A Disaster-Related Event Monitoring System From News Streams
  15. Understanding the error-structure of Time-driven Activity-based Costing
  16. A luenberger observer for a quasi-static disturbance estimation in linear time invariant systems
  17. Automated scoring in the era of artificial intelligence
  18. Integration durch soziale Kontrolle?
  19. Intraindividual variability in identity centrality
  20. Geometric structures using model predictive control for an electromagnetic actuator
  21. Relationships between language-related variations in text tasks, reading comprehension, and students’ motivation and emotions: A systematic review
  22. Petri net based EMIS-mappers for flexible manufacturing systems
  23. Guest Editors' Introduction
  24. Finite element modeling of laser beam welding for residual stress calculation
  25. Introduction to ‘Exploring the frontiers: unveiling new horizons in carbon efficient biomass utilization’
  26. Media coverage of discourse on adaptation
  27. Reliability and Validity of Assessing User Satisfaction With Web-Based Health Interventions