Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. / Tropper, Natalie; Leiß, Dominik; Hänze, Martin.
In: ZDM, Vol. 47, No. 7, 11.2015, p. 1225-1240.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5bee3b437a6d493d93c14cf133c0d007,
title = "Teachers{\textquoteright} temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling",
abstract = "Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students{\textquoteright} modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers{\textquoteright} adaptations to students{\textquoteright} needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students{\textquoteright} interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students{\textquoteright} handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers{\textquoteright} individual support during students{\textquoteright} processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments. ",
keywords = "Didactics of Mathematics, Modellieren, Scaffolding, L{\"o}sungsbeispiele, Adaptive teaching, Mathematical modeling, Scaffolding, Worked-out examples",
author = "Natalie Tropper and Dominik Lei{\ss} and Martin H{\"a}nze",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1225--1240",
journal = "ZDM",
issn = "1863-9690",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling

AU - Tropper, Natalie

AU - Leiß, Dominik

AU - Hänze, Martin

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

AB - Empirical findings show that students have manifold difficulties when dealing with mathematical modeling problems. Accordingly, approaches for supporting students in modeling-based learning environments have to be investigated. In the research presented here, we adopted a scaffolding perspective on teaching modeling with the aim of both providing students with adaptive support during their modeling and gradually enabling them to process modeling problems on their own. Two studies that deal with different elements of scaffolding students’ modeling processes are reported in this paper. Study I focuses on the adaptive core of scaffolding: Teacher–student interactions (5 teachers, 5 pairs of grade 9 students) during modeling are analyzed with regard to reasons, areas, and intentions of teacher support. Finally, these interactions are evaluated with respect to teachers’ adaptations to students’ needs in particular situations. Study II uses a series of worked-out examples intended to realize the scaffolding means of demonstrating preferred behaviors in order to prepare the students (4 grade 8 students) to process modeling problems on their own. We examine both students’ interactions with the materials and their imitation of demonstrated behaviors during problem solving. The findings of study I indicate that the participating teachers do not have or cannot flexibly activate the skills to support their students adaptively, so the use of materials facilitating scaffolding by employing particular scaffolding means such as demonstration could be beneficial. In turn, the results on students’ handling of worked-out examples in study II indicate the importance of teachers’ individual support during students’ processing of materials. Hence, synergistic forms of support—combining multiple, complementary agents and means—have to be considered for fostering students in modeling-based learning environments.

KW - Didactics of Mathematics

KW - Modellieren

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Lösungsbeispiele

KW - Adaptive teaching

KW - Mathematical modeling

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Worked-out examples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947447045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

DO - 10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 47

SP - 1225

EP - 1240

JO - ZDM

JF - ZDM

SN - 1863-9690

IS - 7

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Bridging the Curricular Divide. Integrating sustainability and EFL instruction in a project (week) context for secondary school learners of English and Science
  2. DigiSchreib - A tool to support teachers in the selection and use of digital writing tools
  3. 1st Global Conference on Research Integration and Implementation - i2S 2013
  4. Theoretical Dimensions of Good Practices for Struggling Adolescent Readers
  5. Urban spaces of possibility and imaginaries of sustainability
  6. Network-based analysis of Lagrangian transport and mixing
  7. Workshop "External Actors’ Responses to the Arab Spring The EU in Comparative Perspective" - 2013
  8. New Work in Queer Studies
  9. Challenges for the Positioning of Destinations: Destination Formation Processes and Territorial Boundaries
  10. Quantity, Quality, Trust: Dilemmas and Strategies of Museum Documentation in the Age of AI
  11. Istron-Tagung 2008
  12. Peer review: Grundlagen von formativer Evaluation
  13. Comfort and Intervention Behavior of Drivers in Highly Automated Vehicles with Headway Control
  14. “Behind the data: quantitative approaches to interdisciplinary racism research”
  15. Symposium "Art and its Frames - Continuity and Change" 2014
  16. Schreiben verändert? Eine interaktive Forschungswerkstatt zu Entwicklungs- und Transformationsräumen in Schreibprozessen
  17. Disruption, Technique, World: Thinking the Present with Jean-Luc Nancy
  18. Schreiben digital = Schreiben ohne Regeln?
  19. The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational justice in the use of ecosystems and their services. An ecological-economic mode.
  20. Course/Conference - European Summer Academy 2023
  21. Where tasks, technology, and textbooks meet: Intelligent tutoring systems on the task-based language teacher's horizon (SLTED, Universität Wien)

Publications

  1. Exploring Leverages and Pitfalls of Context Collapse in Modern Communication
  2. Biodiversity in space and time - towards a grid mapping for Mongolia
  3. Neural correlates of own name and own face processing in neurotypical adults scoring low versus high on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder
  4. Challenging the status quo of accelerator research: Concluding remarks
  5. Behavior in the context of control
  6. Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting
  7. The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning
  8. Computational history of knowledge
  9. Instruments for research on transition. Applied methods and approaches for exploring the transition of young care leavers to adulthood
  10. Working memory capacity and narrative task performance
  11. “Smart is not smart enough!” Anticipating critical raw material use in smart city concepts
  12. From teacher-centered instruction to peer tutoring in the heterogeneous international classroom
  13. Predator diversity and abundance provide little support for the enemies hypothesis in forests of high tree diversity
  14. Tracing Concepts
  15. Introduction
  16. Maschinenbelegungsplanung mit evolutionären Algorithmen
  17. Cross-hedging minimum return guarantees
  18. Atmospheric gas-particle partitioning versus gaseous/particle-bound deposition of SVOCs
  19. Importance of timing
  20. Article 21 Formal Validity
  21. Facing complex crime
  22. Mouseology – Ludic Interfaces – Zero Interfaces
  23. A(l)gora: the Mindscape
  24. Local Responses to Global Integration in a Transnational Professional Service Firm
  25. A qualitative approach to evidence-based entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and an example involving business clusters
  26. Fluorometer controlled apparatus designed for long-duration algal-feeding experiments and environmental effect studies with mussels