Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches. / Klamar, Alexander; Horvath, Dorothee; Frese, Michael et al.
in: Safety Science, Jahrgang 177, 106578, 01.09.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef78176bab0040df9e62e6de9da78f2e,
title = "Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches",
abstract = "Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.",
keywords = "Errors, Error management, High reliability, Mindful organizing, Training, Business psychology",
author = "Alexander Klamar and Dorothee Horvath and Michael Frese and Nina Keith",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches

AU - Klamar, Alexander

AU - Horvath, Dorothee

AU - Frese, Michael

AU - Keith, Nina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/9/1

Y1 - 2024/9/1

N2 - Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.

AB - Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.

KW - Errors

KW - Error management

KW - High reliability

KW - Mindful organizing

KW - Training

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196028091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ca31212e-97a1-3d2d-9352-ed5c1d1c4630/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 177

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

M1 - 106578

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Accounting and Modeling as Design Metaphors for CEMIS
  2. Towards a Global Script?
  3. Challenges in detecting proximal effects of existential threat on lie detection accuracy
  4. Predicate‐based model of problem‐solving for robotic actions planning
  5. A survey of empirical studies using transaction level data on exports and imports
  6. Polar Coordinates and Interactive Learning
  7. Increased Reliability of Draw-In Prediction in a Single Stage Deep-Drawing Operation via Transfer Learning
  8. Mechanical behavior, microstructural evolution and texture analysis of AA2024-T351 processed by multi-layer friction surfacing with high build rates
  9. Effect of silicon content on hot working, processing maps, and microstructural evolution of cast TX32-0.4Al magnesium alloy
  10. Mechanistic Realization of the Turtle Shell
  11. Hybrid modelling by machine learning corrections of analytical model predictions towards high-fidelity simulation solutions
  12. How difficult is the adaptation of POS taggers?
  13. Intellectual Property Issues in Space Contracts
  14. Learning how to request using textbooks
  15. Spaces with a temper
  16. Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?
  17. Temperature control in Peltier cells comparing sliding mode control and PID controllers
  18. Interplays between relational and instrumental values
  19. Comparison of modeling approaches based on the microstructure of thermally sprayed coatings
  20. rSOESGOPE Method Applied to Four-Tank System Modeling
  21. Non-invariance? An Overstated Problem With Misconceived Causes
  22. Analytics and Intuition in the Process of Selecting Talent
  23. Using rating scales for the assessment of physical self-concept
  24. Principled Interpolation in Normalizing Flows
  25. Learning with summaries
  26. Facing Up to Third Party Liability for Space Activities
  27. Extraterritorial Asylum Processing. The Libya-Niger Emergency Transit Mechanism
  28. Comparison of Backpropagation and Kalman Filter-based Training for Neural Networks
  29. How much can we learn about voluntary climate action from behavior in public goods games?
  30. A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity
  31. Investigating Factors on R estorative Sleep Quality and its Relationship with Personal Work Performance - An Analysis of Diary Data
  32. An introduction to sliding mode control for interdisciplinary education
  33. Leaf trait variation within individuals mediates the relationship between tree species richness and productivity
  34. Sustainability-oriented technology exploration: managerial values, ambidextrous design, and separation drift
  35. Norms and variation in L2 pragmatics