Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches. / Klamar, Alexander; Horvath, Dorothee; Frese, Michael et al.
in: Safety Science, Jahrgang 177, 106578, 01.09.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef78176bab0040df9e62e6de9da78f2e,
title = "Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches",
abstract = "Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.",
keywords = "Errors, Error management, High reliability, Mindful organizing, Training, Business psychology",
author = "Alexander Klamar and Dorothee Horvath and Michael Frese and Nina Keith",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different approaches to learning from errors: Comparing the effectiveness of high reliability and error management approaches

AU - Klamar, Alexander

AU - Horvath, Dorothee

AU - Frese, Michael

AU - Keith, Nina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/9/1

Y1 - 2024/9/1

N2 - Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.

AB - Errors may be a safety hazard, yet all organizations and managers have to deal with errors. Error management and high reliability are strategies for dealing with errors. While these strategies originate from different research approaches and have been well studied independently, they have not been directly compared in empirical studies. Based on a theoretical analysis of similarities and differences between these approaches, we developed a training based on each of them. For our High Reliability Approach (HRA) training, we deduced training principles based on the facets of safety organizing. For the Error Management Training (EMT) and the training in the error-avoidant control condition (EAT), we oriented on existing training studies. We trained university students (N = 359) in a relevant skill. Our study revealed that both EMT and HRA training led to better performance than EAT. Exploratory analyses revealed emotion control towards errors to be related to performance only in the EMT group. Our article suggests that in spite of similar effectiveness of EMT and HRA training, there may be differential processes in these two approaches.

KW - Errors

KW - Error management

KW - High reliability

KW - Mindful organizing

KW - Training

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196028091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ca31212e-97a1-3d2d-9352-ed5c1d1c4630/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106578

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 177

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

M1 - 106578

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Problem Framing Workshop with Local NGOs
  2. Transdisciplinary Evaluation of Alternative Adaptation Strategies Value-Tree Method as a Tool to Integrate Multiple Values of Science, Practice and the General Public into Decision-Making
  3. Revitalizing the Script as a Concept to Understand Structure and Agency in Institutional Theory
  4. Going Green: Digital project work as a transdisciplinary and transcultural task in the foreign language and STEM classrooms
  5. Tri-trophic interaction networks along a tree diversity gradient in BEF-China: How tree diversity effects higher trophic levels
  6. Reflexive Multi-Criteria Evaluation as a tool to integrate Multiple Values into Decision-Making – a Case Study from Germany
  7. Monkey Business: Who Pulls the Strings? 2013
  8. Intelligent software system for replacing a force sensor in the case of clearance measurement
  9. The influence of polycentricity on collaborative environmental management – the case of EU Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany
  10. Using the Method of Limits to Assess Comfortable Time Headways in Adaptive Cruise Control
  11. Placemaking today: integrating place-oriented thinking into cultural policy frameworks
  12. Undoing Ethnographic and Archaological Objects
  13. Removal of Methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil and Cyclophosphamide from water by UV, UV/H2O2 and UV/Fe2+/H2O2 processe
  14. Spec­tral Ki­ne­tic Si­mu­la­ti­on of Ideal Mul­ti­po­le Re­so­nan­ce Probe
  15. The Relation of Children's Performances in Spatial Tasks at Two Different Scales of Space
  16. Bi-annual General Assembly of the World Values Survey Association - WVS 2014
  17. Correlates of Work Design and the Intention to Continue Work in Retirement
  18. All-Affected, Non-Identity and the Political Representation of Future Generations
  19. Symbolic Environmental Legislation and Societal Self-Deception: The Societal, Technical and Environmental Context
  20. Identification of photo-transformation products of ciprofloxacin and evaluation of their genotoxicity using in silco methods and in vitro assay
  21. Lecturer for the course "Mathematics & Statistics“
  22. 2013 5th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control - ICMIC 2013
  23. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A (Zeitschrift)