Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

Standard

Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups. / Puchta, Claudia; Potter, Jonathan; Wolff, Stephan.
In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.12.2004, p. 285-309.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Puchta C, Potter J, Wolff S. Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups. Qualitative Research. 2004 Dec 1;4(3):285-309. doi: 10.1177/1468794104047231

Bibtex

@article{cca72f1c5ed8428091fde07de99d1e9d,
title = "Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups",
abstract = "Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants{\textquoteright}contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants{\textquoteright}responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.",
keywords = "Business psychology, conversation analysis, data visibility, discursive psychology, focus groups, moderation, repeat receipts",
author = "Claudia Puchta and Jonathan Potter and Stephan Wolff",
year = "2004",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468794104047231",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "285--309",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups

AU - Puchta, Claudia

AU - Potter, Jonathan

AU - Wolff, Stephan

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants’contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants’responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.

AB - Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants’contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants’responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.

KW - Business psychology

KW - conversation analysis

KW - data visibility

KW - discursive psychology

KW - focus groups

KW - moderation

KW - repeat receipts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85004367729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/600c09d9-ab3b-3128-b331-d6c633c6d5d8/

U2 - 10.1177/1468794104047231

DO - 10.1177/1468794104047231

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 4

SP - 285

EP - 309

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Mathematical and Computational Applications (Fachzeitschrift)
  2. Project Workshop on "Worker Flows, Match Quality, and Productivity" - 2019
  3. Curating Diversity in Global Performance Art
  4. Evaluation of tension-compression asymmetry in nanocrystalline PdAu using a Drucker-Prager type constitutive model.
  5. Symposium "Art and its Frames - Continuity and Change" 2014
  6. Comfort and Intervention Behavior of Drivers in Highly Automated Vehicles with Headway Control
  7. International Conference of EAS and ISME - 2007
  8. Migrations of Knowledge - Migknow 2014
  9. The Predictive Power of Social Media Sentiment for Short-Term Stock Movements
  10. Co-creating transformative processes - a designerly approach
  11. Education for Sustainable Development – Experiences from Theory and Practice
  12. Requests in Nigerian and British English conversational interactions: A corpus-based approach.
  13. Research Workshop “Innovation & Value Creation"
  14. 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications: Program Committee Member - IBICA2012
  15. Prototypes: The Usefulf Ambiguity of the „Biological Computer" (Annual Meeting of the AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CYBERNETICS)
  16. Video or Text Cases in Problem-Oriented or Direct Instructional Settings for Preservice Teachers?
  17. Agile Portfolio Management Patterns - A Research Design
  18. Co-creating transformative processes - a designerly approach
  19. HOW SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING CONTRIBUTES TO IMPROVED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL
  20. Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Law
  21. 5th Int. Summer Academy „Energy and the Environment“ 2008
  22. European Academy of Management - EURAM 2014 (Veranstaltung)
  23. Fakultät MT allgemein (Organisation)
  24. Processes of Sustainability Transformation. An inter- and transdisciplinary project
  25. Conference on Computational Design Culture - MECS 2015
  26. From Fleeting Enchantment to Embodied Commitment: How Bottom-up Momentum can Emerge and Persist