1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Repeat Receipts: A device for generating...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research

Standard

Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups. / Puchta, Claudia; Potter, Jonathan; Wolff, Stephan.
In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.12.2004, p. 285-309.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research

Harvard

Puchta, C, Potter, J & Wolff, S 2004, 'Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups', Qualitative Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047231

APA

Puchta, C., Potter, J., & Wolff, S. (2004). Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047231

Vancouver

Puchta C, Potter J, Wolff S. Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups. Qualitative Research. 2004 Dec 1;4(3):285-309. doi: 10.1177/1468794104047231

Bibtex

@article{cca72f1c5ed8428091fde07de99d1e9d,
title = "Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups",
abstract = "Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants{\textquoteright}contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants{\textquoteright}responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.",
keywords = "Business psychology, conversation analysis, data visibility, discursive psychology, focus groups, moderation, repeat receipts",
author = "Claudia Puchta and Jonathan Potter and Stephan Wolff",
year = "2004",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468794104047231",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "285--309",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat Receipts: A device for generating visible data in market research focus groups

AU - Puchta, Claudia

AU - Potter, Jonathan

AU - Wolff, Stephan

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants’contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants’responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.

AB - Market research focus groups generate three types of data: first, representatives of commissioning companies or organizations watch the group from behind a one-way mirror; second, they receive a video of the group discussion; third, they are given a report of the focus group. This article analyses how the required data are interactionally produced to be visible for the people behind the one-way screen, for the video and for the report. It describes the phenomenon of repeat receipts as a central device for producing visible data. Repeat receipts are sequences where the moderator repeats participants’contributions, typically with intonational cues that mark completion. Repeat receipts have several functions. They can (a) highlight central market-research relevant terms from participants’responses; (b) strip off rhetorical relations by repeating utterances in a decontextualized manner; (c) summarize contributions in repeating contributions of different authors as if of one voice; (d) cover conflict in repeating potentially contradictory contributions as discrete statements; (e) socialize responding by providing templates for the required contributions. Repeat receipts help shape the focus group interaction to generate visible data for the overhearing audience, the video and the report. The article ends with a comparison of repeats in market research focus groups, standardized surveys and news interviews.

KW - Business psychology

KW - conversation analysis

KW - data visibility

KW - discursive psychology

KW - focus groups

KW - moderation

KW - repeat receipts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85004367729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/600c09d9-ab3b-3128-b331-d6c633c6d5d8/

U2 - 10.1177/1468794104047231

DO - 10.1177/1468794104047231

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 4

SP - 285

EP - 309

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 3

ER -

Other publications by the same author(s)

Manufacturing Individual Opinions: Market Research Focus Groups and the Discursive Psychology of Evaluation

Puchta, C. & Potter, J., 09.2012, Focus Group Research: PART FOUR: SPECIFIC METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES. Walden, G. R. (ed.). London: SAGE Publications Inc., Vol. 4. p. 315-338 24 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research

Repeat Receipts: A Device for Generating Visible Data in Market Research Focus Groups

Puchta, C., Potter, J. & Wolff, S., 09.2012, Focus Group Research. Walden, G. R. (ed.). London: SAGE Publications Inc., p. 283-306 24 p.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research

Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity

Puchta, C. & Potter, J., 08.1999, In: Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3, 3, p. 314-335 22 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research

Culture Check: Kulturwissenschaftliche Marktforschung: Das Beispiel Zigaretten

Puchta, C. & Rüsing, O., 31.10.2006, In: Planung & Analyse. 34, 5, p. 24-26 3 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research

Diskursanalysen institutioneller Gespräche - das Beispiel von „Focus Groups“

Puchta, C. & Wolff, S., 2010, Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse: Forschungspraxis. Keller, R., Hirseland, A., Schneider, W. & Viehöver, W. (eds.). 4 ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Vol. 2. p. 473-490 18 p. (Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse; vol. 2)(Interdisziplinäre Diskursforschung).

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. SAGE Open (Fachzeitschrift)
  2. Time-Induced Political Inequality: Why Future Generations Need Proxy Representation
  3. The many paths one picture can paint: Tracing a visual’s boundary work
  4. The Relevance of New Types of Visualization for Emotional Styles in the Field of Christian Religion
  5. A Tool for Applications: Wavelet Packets
  6. Setting up a transnational, transdisciplinary and transformative research cooperation - but how?
  7. Academy of Management (Externe Organisation)
  8. The Relevance of Playful Elements in Hermeneutic Methods
  9. Observing Videos of Teachers’ Own or Others’ Classrooms. What Do Teachers Learn When They Analyze Two Different Video Types?
  10. Trajectories optimisation for electrical vehicles driven by a three-phase synchronous motor
  11. The Potential of Classroom Videos to Support Teacher Reflection. What Do Teachers Learn When They Analyze Different Video-Materials in Various Instructional Approaches?
  12. Chartered Institute of Arbitration (Externe Organisation)

Publications

  1. Finite element modeling of laser beam welding for residual stress calculation
  2. A holistic view on security and collaboration in safe space
  3. Sustainable Consumption - Mapping the Terrain
  4. Requests for mathematical reasoning in textbooks for primary-level students
  5. I&EC 18-Small particle size magnesium in one-pot Grignard-Zerewitinoff reactions: Kinetics of and practical application to reductive dechlorination of persistent organic pollutants
  6. Development and validation of the Later Life Work Index for successful management of an aging workforce
  7. Animating embryos
  8. Achieving enhanced mechanical properties in Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloy by altering dynamic recrystallization behavior via pre-ageing treatment
  9. Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses
  10. NEW CONCEPTS IN INNOVATION OUTPUT MEASUREMENT - KLEINKNECHT,A, BAIN,D
  11. Quantum computing
  12. Counteracting electric vehicle range concern with a scalable behavioural intervention
  13. Empathy as a motivator of dyadic helping across group boundaries
  14. Diversity: Konzept. Programmatik. Praxis.
  15. Categorizing urban tasks
  16. The Bumpy Road from Investigation to Knowledge
  17. The Politics of (Non)Knowledge in the (Un)Making of Migration
  18. Function, flexibility, and responsibility
  19. A Bayesian EAP-Based Nonlinear Extension of Croon and Van Veldhoven’s Model for Analyzing Data from Micro–Macro Multilevel Designs
  20. Action Learning
  21. Addressing Sufficiency
  22. Continous preventive diagnosis for cardiovascular diseases based on stochastic modeling
  23. Data quality assessment framework for critical raw materials. The case of cobalt
  24. Exports and productivity growth
  25. Identification of floodplain contamination hot spots by reconstructing Elbe river pollution load history and high flood sediment distribution during inundation.
  26. Effect of Planning for Connectivity on Linear Reserve Networks
  27. Optical part measuring inside a milling machine
  28. Recontextualizing context
  29. Sustainability in Business: Integrated Management of Value Creation and Disvalue Mitigation
  30. Fürsorge oder Selbstbestimmung?
  31. Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation