Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history. / von Wehrden, Henrik; Abson, David J.; Beckmann, Michael et al.
In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 29, No. 6, 07.2014, p. 941-948.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9b4636e389fb459b8dd0609cea16a4c2,
title = "Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history",
abstract = "The {"}land sharing versus land sparing{"} concept provides a framework for comparing potential land use patterns in terms of trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural yields at a landscape scale. Here, we raise two additional aspects to be considered in the sparing/sharing debate, supported by a review of available literature. First, beta and gamma (instead of alpha) diversity measures capture landscape scale variance in biodiversity in response to land use changes and should be considered for the long-term management of agricultural landscapes. Moreover, beta and gamma diversity may better account for comparisons of biodiversity between spared and shared land use options. Second, land use history has a pronounced influence on the complexity and variance in agricultural habitat niches at a landscape scale, which in turn may determine the relevance of sparing or sharing land use options. Appropriate and comparable biodiversity metrics and the recognition of landscape history are two vital preconditions in aligning biological conservation goals with maximized yields within the sparing/sharing framework.",
keywords = "Biology, Agricultural landscape, Beta-diversity, biodiversity, Land management, Yields, Ecosystems Research",
author = "{von Wehrden}, Henrik and Abson, {David J.} and Michael Beckmann and Cord, {Anna F.} and Stefan Klotz and Ralf Seppelt",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "941--948",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs

T2 - considering diversity scales and land-use history

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

AU - Abson, David J.

AU - Beckmann, Michael

AU - Cord, Anna F.

AU - Klotz, Stefan

AU - Seppelt, Ralf

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - The "land sharing versus land sparing" concept provides a framework for comparing potential land use patterns in terms of trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural yields at a landscape scale. Here, we raise two additional aspects to be considered in the sparing/sharing debate, supported by a review of available literature. First, beta and gamma (instead of alpha) diversity measures capture landscape scale variance in biodiversity in response to land use changes and should be considered for the long-term management of agricultural landscapes. Moreover, beta and gamma diversity may better account for comparisons of biodiversity between spared and shared land use options. Second, land use history has a pronounced influence on the complexity and variance in agricultural habitat niches at a landscape scale, which in turn may determine the relevance of sparing or sharing land use options. Appropriate and comparable biodiversity metrics and the recognition of landscape history are two vital preconditions in aligning biological conservation goals with maximized yields within the sparing/sharing framework.

AB - The "land sharing versus land sparing" concept provides a framework for comparing potential land use patterns in terms of trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural yields at a landscape scale. Here, we raise two additional aspects to be considered in the sparing/sharing debate, supported by a review of available literature. First, beta and gamma (instead of alpha) diversity measures capture landscape scale variance in biodiversity in response to land use changes and should be considered for the long-term management of agricultural landscapes. Moreover, beta and gamma diversity may better account for comparisons of biodiversity between spared and shared land use options. Second, land use history has a pronounced influence on the complexity and variance in agricultural habitat niches at a landscape scale, which in turn may determine the relevance of sparing or sharing land use options. Appropriate and comparable biodiversity metrics and the recognition of landscape history are two vital preconditions in aligning biological conservation goals with maximized yields within the sparing/sharing framework.

KW - Biology

KW - Agricultural landscape

KW - Beta-diversity

KW - biodiversity

KW - Land management

KW - Yields

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903125043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7

DO - 10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 29

SP - 941

EP - 948

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 6

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Inklusionsorientierte Lehrkräftebildung an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg - Entwicklung und Implementation von Basisqualifikation und Profilstudium
  2. Filming Futures
  3. "Life with Uncle"
  4. The Holy Spirit, the church, and Christian unity, proceedings of the consultation held at the Monastery of Bose, Italy (14 - 20 October 2002)
  5. Digitale Medientechnologien
  6. The organizational a priori
  7. On the evidence for human use and control of fire at Schöningen
  8. The health consequences of child mental health problems and parenting styles
  9. Entgrenzung des künstlerischen Feldes durch Globalisierung ?
  10. Abgehoben und entkoppelt?
  11. When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake
  12. "Taking the pulse" of doctors and nurses to reduce pharmaceutical residues in the water cycle
  13. Modul Wie Gender in die Bildung kommt?!
  14. Emotional knowledge, emotional styles, and religion
  15. IMAGE: Development of a European curriculum for the training of prevention managers
  16. Merkmale guter Evaluation und Selbstevaluation
  17. The heterogeneous competitive effects of trade and foreign direct investment
  18. What patients value in physicians
  19. Arbitrating the Oceans: The Future of Inter-State Arbitration in the International Law of the Sea
  20. Relationaler Realismus?
  21. Conclusion: Independent local lists in East and West European countries
  22. Heterogenität, Inklusion und Sachunterricht: Beiträge der Hochschulbildung?
  23. Gewalt
  24. Krise der Kunstkritik?
  25. 12. Fachgespräch der Clearingstelle EEG "1. Novelle des EEG 2012"
  26. Willkommen, Mr. Chance