Ordnung, die sich bildet: Versionen der naturalisierung in der ökonomie

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ordnung, die sich bildet: Versionen der naturalisierung in der ökonomie. / Schefczyk, Michael.
In: Neue Rundschau, Vol. 114, No. 1, 2003, p. 21-38.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{72ebb49c84504580a8a317831d35560c,
title = "Ordnung, die sich bildet: Versionen der naturalisierung in der {\"o}konomie",
abstract = "The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.",
keywords = "Philosophie",
author = "Michael Schefczyk",
year = "2003",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "114",
pages = "21--38",
journal = "Neue Rundschau",
issn = "0028-3347",
publisher = "S. Fischer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ordnung, die sich bildet

T2 - Versionen der naturalisierung in der ökonomie

AU - Schefczyk, Michael

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.

AB - The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.

KW - Philosophie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949362530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

VL - 114

SP - 21

EP - 38

JO - Neue Rundschau

JF - Neue Rundschau

SN - 0028-3347

IS - 1

ER -