Social Synergies, Tradeoffs, and Equity in Marine Conservation Impacts
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Jahrgang 44, 17.10.2019, S. 347-372.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Synergies, Tradeoffs, and Equity in Marine Conservation Impacts
AU - Gill, David A.
AU - Cheng, Samantha H.
AU - Glew, Louise
AU - Aigner, Ernest
AU - Bennett, Nathan J.
AU - Mascia, Michael B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10/17
Y1 - 2019/10/17
N2 - Biodiversity conservation interventions often aim to benefit both nature and people; however, the social impacts of these interventions remain poorly understood. We reviewed recent literature on the social impacts of four marine conservation interventions to understand the synergies, tradeoffs, and equity (STE) of these impacts, focusing on the direction, magnitude, and distribution of impacts across domains of human wellbeing and across spatial, temporal, and social scales. STE literature has increased dramatically since 2000, particularly for marine protected areas (MPAs), but remains limited. Few studies use rigorous counterfactual study designs, and significant research gaps remain regarding specific wellbeing domains (culture, education), social groups (gender, age, ethnic groups), and impacts over time. Practitioners and researchers should recognize the role of shifting property rights, power asymmetries, individual capabilities, and resource dependency in shaping STE in conservation outcomes, and utilize multi-consequential frameworks to support the wellbeing of vulnerable and marginalized groups.
AB - Biodiversity conservation interventions often aim to benefit both nature and people; however, the social impacts of these interventions remain poorly understood. We reviewed recent literature on the social impacts of four marine conservation interventions to understand the synergies, tradeoffs, and equity (STE) of these impacts, focusing on the direction, magnitude, and distribution of impacts across domains of human wellbeing and across spatial, temporal, and social scales. STE literature has increased dramatically since 2000, particularly for marine protected areas (MPAs), but remains limited. Few studies use rigorous counterfactual study designs, and significant research gaps remain regarding specific wellbeing domains (culture, education), social groups (gender, age, ethnic groups), and impacts over time. Practitioners and researchers should recognize the role of shifting property rights, power asymmetries, individual capabilities, and resource dependency in shaping STE in conservation outcomes, and utilize multi-consequential frameworks to support the wellbeing of vulnerable and marginalized groups.
KW - biodiversity conservation
KW - equity
KW - marine conservation
KW - social impacts
KW - synergies
KW - tradeoffs
KW - Economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073423360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5f9b6b3b-d08e-3688-b3e7-f3db3efd82c4/
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-110718-032344
DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-110718-032344
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85073423360
VL - 44
SP - 347
EP - 372
JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
SN - 1543-5938
ER -