Research on teaching of linguistically and culturally diverse students in Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Authors

This chapter explores the German approach to educating linguistically and culturally diverse students, emphasizing the need for research to address educational disparities. Migration in Germany has led to a rise in students with migrant backgrounds, creating challenges for the education system. Studies like the Education Trends of the German Institute for Educational Quality Improvement (IQB) in 2022 highlight significant skill gaps between students with and without migrant backgrounds. To promote educational equality and social integration, the German Standing Conference of Ministers of Education (KMK) has developed a framework for language-sensitive teaching, emphasizing multilingualism as a resource, diagnostic tools for adaptive learning, and integrating language education into teacher training. Key research areas include evaluating the effectiveness of language-sensitive teaching methods and assessing how language adaptations in STEM subjects enhance understanding. Initiatives like DaZKom focus on improving teachers’ competencies in language-sensitive instruction. Research also examines teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism, emphasizing the need for positive attitudes and structured support to help diverse students succeed. This chapter underscores the importance of developing strategies to support these students, ensuring they receive quality education that fosters social inclusion and success in a globalized world.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
TitelInnovative Teaching and Classroom Processes : Research Perspectives from Germany and China
HerausgeberTimo Ehmke, John Chi-Kin lee
Anzahl der Seiten10
VerlagTaylor and Francis Inc.
Erscheinungsdatum01.01.2025
Seiten211-220
ISBN (Print)9781032565521
ISBN (elektronisch)9781040345597
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.01.2025

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 selection and editorial matter, Timo Ehmke and John Chi-Kin Lee; individual chapters, the contributors.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Florian Hobbeling

Publikationen

  1. Medienethik
  2. Rita Ponce de León
  3. Von Besserwissern, Moralaposteln und Tugendwächtern
  4. "Web4Health"
  5. Potenziale oder Kompetenzen?
  6. Collective Renewable Energy Prosumers and the Promises of the Energy Union
  7. A Global Phenomenon with a Unique Pinoy Twist - Das Vinyl Revival in Metro Manila
  8. Gehirn und Züchtung
  9. Rassismus im Kontext rechtsextremer Ideologie
  10. Space Shuffle
  11. Vorwort von Stefan Schaltegger
  12. Vielfältige Partizipation oder Repräsentation von Vielfalt in der Occupy-Bewegung?
  13. Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in the aquatic environment
  14. Potenziale eines nachhaltigen Unterrichts und einer nachhaltigen Schulentwicklung durch ein netzwerkgestütztes kooperatives Selbstlernen Berufsbildender Schulen
  15. Multisensory Design of Retail Environments
  16. Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehramtsstudierenden sichtbar machen
  17. Formazione religiosa
  18. Economic Impacts of Climate Change
  19. Exports and Firm Characteristics in German Manufacturing Industries
  20. Organizational Downsizing
  21. Sustainable Production of the Cyanophycin Biopolymer in Tobacco in the Greenhouse and Field
  22. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit
  23. The Theatricality of Organizational Atmosphere
  24. Engagement in innovation management
  25. Kompetenzmodellierung Eine aktuelle Zwischenbilanz des DFG- Schwerpunktprogramms
  26. Editorial
  27. Long-term study of root biomass in a biodiversity experiment reveals shifts in diversity effects over time
  28. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance – A replication study
  29. We seem to play the platonic tape backwards
  30. Using self-regulation to overcome the detrimental effects of anger in negotiations
  31. Langweiliges Verbrechen
  32. On the theoretical concept of the potential natural vegetation and proposals for an up-to-date modification
  33. Mexican school students’ perceptions of inclusion