Whatever we negotiate is not what I like: How value-driven conflicts impact negotiation behaviors, outcomes, and subjective evaluations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{db56f601f3df46e98c414e2d3f4cfa5b,
title = "Whatever we negotiate is not what I like: How value-driven conflicts impact negotiation behaviors, outcomes, and subjective evaluations",
abstract = "Value conflicts have been shown to impair negotiation behaviors and outcomes (Harinck & Ellemers, 2014). The present studies aim to replicate and extend this finding in a paradigm where the parties' values were different, but not opposed. We hypothesized that activating values, rather than utilities, as motives in a negotiation would not only impair negotiation behavior and outcomes, but also subjective evaluations of the negotiated agreements. We further predicted that information provided about the counterparts' priorities would be a less effective facilitator of integrative negotiating in value-driven than in utility-driven conflicts. Two preregistered experiments (N = 176/310) confirm that a value motive leads to an increased aversion to trade-offs and to more compromise offers (Studies 1 and 2), and to lower individual and joint outcomes (Study 2). The results also show that the activation of value rather than utility motives in the parties trigger subjective perceptions of clashing values rather than conflicting interests, even though the values were not opposed. By triggering these perceptions, the value motives indirectly lead to worse subjective evaluations of the outcome, the process, the self, and (in Study 2) the relationship, even when controlling for objective outcomes. Providing information about the counterpart's underlying motives did not produce conclusive differential effects on negotiation behaviors and outcomes, possibly because the shared information did not increase the perceived discrepancy between counterparts. Theoretical and practical implications of the results for value-driven conflicts are discussed.",
keywords = "Psychology, Value conflicts, Integrative negotiation, Subjective value, Information exchange",
author = "Carolin Schuster and Majer, {Johann Martin} and Roman Tr{\"o}tschel",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103993",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whatever we negotiate is not what I like

T2 - How value-driven conflicts impact negotiation behaviors, outcomes, and subjective evaluations

AU - Schuster, Carolin

AU - Majer, Johann Martin

AU - Trötschel, Roman

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Value conflicts have been shown to impair negotiation behaviors and outcomes (Harinck & Ellemers, 2014). The present studies aim to replicate and extend this finding in a paradigm where the parties' values were different, but not opposed. We hypothesized that activating values, rather than utilities, as motives in a negotiation would not only impair negotiation behavior and outcomes, but also subjective evaluations of the negotiated agreements. We further predicted that information provided about the counterparts' priorities would be a less effective facilitator of integrative negotiating in value-driven than in utility-driven conflicts. Two preregistered experiments (N = 176/310) confirm that a value motive leads to an increased aversion to trade-offs and to more compromise offers (Studies 1 and 2), and to lower individual and joint outcomes (Study 2). The results also show that the activation of value rather than utility motives in the parties trigger subjective perceptions of clashing values rather than conflicting interests, even though the values were not opposed. By triggering these perceptions, the value motives indirectly lead to worse subjective evaluations of the outcome, the process, the self, and (in Study 2) the relationship, even when controlling for objective outcomes. Providing information about the counterpart's underlying motives did not produce conclusive differential effects on negotiation behaviors and outcomes, possibly because the shared information did not increase the perceived discrepancy between counterparts. Theoretical and practical implications of the results for value-driven conflicts are discussed.

AB - Value conflicts have been shown to impair negotiation behaviors and outcomes (Harinck & Ellemers, 2014). The present studies aim to replicate and extend this finding in a paradigm where the parties' values were different, but not opposed. We hypothesized that activating values, rather than utilities, as motives in a negotiation would not only impair negotiation behavior and outcomes, but also subjective evaluations of the negotiated agreements. We further predicted that information provided about the counterparts' priorities would be a less effective facilitator of integrative negotiating in value-driven than in utility-driven conflicts. Two preregistered experiments (N = 176/310) confirm that a value motive leads to an increased aversion to trade-offs and to more compromise offers (Studies 1 and 2), and to lower individual and joint outcomes (Study 2). The results also show that the activation of value rather than utility motives in the parties trigger subjective perceptions of clashing values rather than conflicting interests, even though the values were not opposed. By triggering these perceptions, the value motives indirectly lead to worse subjective evaluations of the outcome, the process, the self, and (in Study 2) the relationship, even when controlling for objective outcomes. Providing information about the counterpart's underlying motives did not produce conclusive differential effects on negotiation behaviors and outcomes, possibly because the shared information did not increase the perceived discrepancy between counterparts. Theoretical and practical implications of the results for value-driven conflicts are discussed.

KW - Psychology

KW - Value conflicts

KW - Integrative negotiation

KW - Subjective value

KW - Information exchange

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086715632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103993

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103993

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 90

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

M1 - 103993

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Outcome expectations and work design characteristics in post-retirement work planning
  2. Extension of Biodiesel Aging Mechanism–the Role and Influence of Methyl Oleate and the Contribution of Alcohols Through the Use of Solketal
  3. Competitive interactions shape plant responses to nitrogen fertilization and drought
  4. Äpfel mit Birnen vergleichen
  5. LivingCare - An autonomously learning, human centered home automation system
  6. Artistic exchanges across Afro-Eurasia
  7. Stranger Things
  8. Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape
  9. Article 67 CISG
  10. The counter-revolution is really televised …
  11. The Video Game Industry: Formation, Present State, and Future, Peter Zackariasson and Timothy Wilson (eds) (2012) New York: Routledge
  12. Media Organize: A Companion to Technological Objects
  13. Art. 74: The "grossly unreasonable" unilateral determination of price or other contract terms and its substitution under the proposed Art 74 CESL
  14. Transnational collaboration for sustainability in higher education
  15. Can the business model of Handelsbanken be an archetype for small and medium sized banks?
  16. Using the three horizons approach to explore pathways towards positive futures for agricultural landscapes with rich biodiversity
  17. Cooperation, Trust and Performance
  18. High-Priced and Dangerous
  19. Mobility, Media, and the Experiences of Airbnb’s Aesthetic Regime
  20. Wigmorian Copyright
  21. Acute effects of resistance training at different range of motions on plantar flexion mechanical properties and force
  22. Anleihekommunikation in der Unternehmenspraxis
  23. Einleitung
  24. An assessment of The Natural Step theory of sustainability
  25. Education for Sustainable Development – European Approaches
  26. Entrepreneurship training in developing countries
  27. Unveiling the Bounty
  28. Costs of Inaction and Costs of Action in Climate Protection
  29. Ansatzkonzeptionen