Using self-regulation to overcome the detrimental effects of anger in negotiations
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Authors
Both being angry (intrapersonal anger) and facing expressions of anger (interpersonal anger) impair negotiators’ goal attainment, as evident in less profitable outcomes. Here, we hypothesize that fostering self-regulation by forming if-then plans helps to overcome these detriments. In Study 1, angry negotiators attained less successful joint gains than non-angry negotiators. Angry negotiators who had formed an if-then plan about how to negotiate, however, attained similarly profitable outcomes as non-angry negotiators. In Study 2, participants negotiating with an angry opponent conceded more than those facing a non-angry opponent. Participants who had formed an if-then plan, however, conceded less than participants without self-regulatory help. These findings demonstrate that fostering self-regulation is a valuable means to overcome the detriments of intrapersonal and interpersonal anger in negotiations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Economic Psychology |
Volume | 58 |
Pages (from-to) | 31-43 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 0167-4870 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01.02.2017 |
- Psychology - Negotiation, Intrapersonal anger, Interpersonal anger, Self-regulation, If-then plans