Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety. / Trebits, Anna.
In: Applied Linguistics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 155-174.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c327979aef25460c995990b817c6838b,
title = "Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.",
keywords = "Language Studies",
author = "Anna Trebits",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/applin/amu006",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "155--174",
journal = "Applied Linguistics",
issn = "0142-6001",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production

T2 - The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety

AU - Trebits, Anna

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.

AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.

KW - Language Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987875507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/applin/amu006

DO - 10.1093/applin/amu006

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 37

SP - 155

EP - 174

JO - Applied Linguistics

JF - Applied Linguistics

SN - 0142-6001

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. International Symposium "Museums Matter: A Tribute to Stephen Weil" - 2006
  2. Information Systems Journal (Fachzeitschrift)
  3. Wie kommt das Neue in die Welt?
  4. Aufstehen für Klimagerechtigkeit
  5. Characterization of Polyethylene oxide (PEO) Nanofibers by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
  6. Computer Games / Players / Game Cultures - 2009
  7. Vermeintliche Selbstverständlichkeiten in einem ungeklärten Feld
  8. 22. Symposium Deutschdidaktik - SDD 2018
  9. Webinar "Linking Sustainability and Health in Consumption: Some Selected Innovative Programs in a Whole School Approach"
  10. 3rd International Symposium ''Genotoxicity in aquatic systems: Causes, effects and future needs'' - 2010
  11. 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - AOM 2014
  12. Aufbruch in das Fremdsprachenlernen von morgen
  13. Vocational Integration of Refugees: Networking with companies and (social) entrepreneurship
  14. Indie Game Studies Year Eleven: panel at DiGRA - Defragging Game Studies - Atlanta, GA
  15. Geben Plattformen CrowdworkerInnen eine Stimme? Eine explorative Studie zur CrowdworkerInnen-Partizipation auf Crowdsourcing-Plattformen
  16. WBV Bertelsmann Verlag (Verlag)
  17. Vortrag: Konzepte und Instrumente des Nachhaltigkeitsmanagements
  18. Begutachtung von eingereichten Manuskripten in Zeitschriften (Peer-Review)
  19. The Global Perspective of Education for Sustainable Development: Which key competencies do persons need for thinking and acting globally in the world society?
  20. Universität Oxford
  21. Visuelles Wissen durch und über Gesten
  22. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group (Verlag)
  23. Universität von Agder
  24. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  25. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  26. Workshop "Klimaanpassungsstrategie"
  27. A model of learning analytics, digital badges & academic competencies to enhance student retention
  28. Feedback im Kontext digitaler Medien – Über die Wirksamkeit einer Lehr-Lern-Plattform in Einzellernsettings sowie dessen Nutzung und Wahrnehmung durch Schüler*innen