Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety. / Trebits, Anna.
In: Applied Linguistics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 155-174.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c327979aef25460c995990b817c6838b,
title = "Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.",
keywords = "Language Studies",
author = "Anna Trebits",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/applin/amu006",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "155--174",
journal = "Applied Linguistics",
issn = "0142-6001",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production

T2 - The Contribution of Input, Processing, and Output Anxiety

AU - Trebits, Anna

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.

AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive task complexity and individual differences in input, processing, and output anxiety (IPOA) on L2 narrative production. The participants were enrolled in a bilingual secondary educational program. They performed two narrative tasks in speech and writing. The participants' level of anxiety was assessed using the IPOA scale (MacIntyre and Gardner 1994). The results demonstrate that spoken and written modalities are influenced differently by anxiety with the impact of output anxiety being significantly stronger in speech than in writing. Another important finding was that input and processing anxiety had both facilitating and debilitating effects on learners' L2 output. As regards the effect of task complexity on participants' narratives, the findings suggest that the different stages of language production need to be taken into account when categorizing tasks on the basis of the cognitive load they impose on learners.

KW - Language Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987875507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/applin/amu006

DO - 10.1093/applin/amu006

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 37

SP - 155

EP - 174

JO - Applied Linguistics

JF - Applied Linguistics

SN - 0142-6001

IS - 2

ER -

DOI