Professional Service Firms, Knowledge-based Competition and the Heterarchical Organization Form
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review
Standard
Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Professional Services. ed. / Markus Reihlen; Andreas Werr. 1. ed. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012. p. 107-126.
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Professional Service Firms, Knowledge-based Competition and the Heterarchical Organization Form
AU - Reihlen, Markus
AU - Mone, Mark
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Professional service organizations, such as advertising agencies, software development fi rms, accounting organizations, and consulting or R&D fi rms, operate in competitive environments driven by an imperative of fl exibility and rapid learning (Empson, 2001; Starbuck, 1992). Superior competitive positions in knowledge- based industries derive from greater agility and more valuable knowledge creation for problem-solving relative to that of competitors (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). The organizational implications of knowledge- based competition are clearly illustrated in the commercial software business, where the internet gave rise to open source communities such as Linux or the Apache Foundation. In such organizations, the plurality of distrib-uted intelligence is managed by principles of decentralization of authority and self- organization (Parhankangas et al., 2005). Similarly, the advertising industry has been described as having project ecology, in which temporary organizational architectures of learning are negotiated between diff erent actors within and outside the fi rm (Grabher, 2001, 2002, 2004).The key idea of project ecology is that a fi rm is not a coherent entity organized around clearly defi ned communication and authority structures. Rather, project ecologies provide arenas “in which incongruent physical and organizational layers are ‘stapled’ for a limited period of time—just to be reconfi gured anew in the context of subsequent projects” (Grabher, 2002: 259). Other examples from technical consultancy (Miles & Snow, 1995), management consultancy (Alvesson, 1995), international accounting (Brown, Cooper, Greenwood, & Hinings, 1996; Reihlen, Albers, & Kewitz, 2009), virtual customer environments (Nambisan & Baron, 2010), medical trauma centers (Faraj & Xiao, 2006), and fi nancial services (Sydow, 2004; Sydow & Windeler, 1998) show that an increasing amount of knowledge work is organized in ways that supplant typical Weberian categories of hierarchy and fi rm- centered approaches to organizational design
AB - Professional service organizations, such as advertising agencies, software development fi rms, accounting organizations, and consulting or R&D fi rms, operate in competitive environments driven by an imperative of fl exibility and rapid learning (Empson, 2001; Starbuck, 1992). Superior competitive positions in knowledge- based industries derive from greater agility and more valuable knowledge creation for problem-solving relative to that of competitors (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). The organizational implications of knowledge- based competition are clearly illustrated in the commercial software business, where the internet gave rise to open source communities such as Linux or the Apache Foundation. In such organizations, the plurality of distrib-uted intelligence is managed by principles of decentralization of authority and self- organization (Parhankangas et al., 2005). Similarly, the advertising industry has been described as having project ecology, in which temporary organizational architectures of learning are negotiated between diff erent actors within and outside the fi rm (Grabher, 2001, 2002, 2004).The key idea of project ecology is that a fi rm is not a coherent entity organized around clearly defi ned communication and authority structures. Rather, project ecologies provide arenas “in which incongruent physical and organizational layers are ‘stapled’ for a limited period of time—just to be reconfi gured anew in the context of subsequent projects” (Grabher, 2002: 259). Other examples from technical consultancy (Miles & Snow, 1995), management consultancy (Alvesson, 1995), international accounting (Brown, Cooper, Greenwood, & Hinings, 1996; Reihlen, Albers, & Kewitz, 2009), virtual customer environments (Nambisan & Baron, 2010), medical trauma centers (Faraj & Xiao, 2006), and fi nancial services (Sydow, 2004; Sydow & Windeler, 1998) show that an increasing amount of knowledge work is organized in ways that supplant typical Weberian categories of hierarchy and fi rm- centered approaches to organizational design
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881675698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4337/9781781009109.00016
DO - 10.4337/9781781009109.00016
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781848446267
SP - 107
EP - 126
BT - Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Professional Services
A2 - Reihlen, Markus
A2 - Werr, Andreas
PB - Edward Elgar Publishing
CY - Cheltenham, U.K.
ER -