Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Nature Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 12, 01.12.2019, p. 1115-1121.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals
AU - Mastrángelo, Matías E.
AU - Pérez-Harguindeguy, Natalia
AU - Enrico, Lucas
AU - Bennett, Elena
AU - Lavorel, Sandra
AU - Cumming, Graeme S.
AU - Abeygunawardane, Dilini
AU - Amarilla, Leonardo D.
AU - Burkhard, Benjamin
AU - Egoh, Benis N.
AU - Frishkoff, Luke
AU - Galetto, Leonardo
AU - Huber, Sibyl
AU - Karp, Daniel S.
AU - Ke, Alison
AU - Kowaljow, Esteban
AU - Kronenburg-García, Angela
AU - Locatelli, Bruno
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Meyfroidt, Patrick
AU - Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.
AU - Nel, Jeanne
AU - Nicholas, Kimberly A.
AU - Nicholson, Charles
AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
AU - Rahlao, Sebataolo J.
AU - Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara
AU - Ricketts, Taylor
AU - Shrestha, Uttam B.
AU - Torres, Carolina
AU - Winkler, Klara J.
AU - Zoeller, Kim
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Regional and global assessments periodically update what we know, and highlight what remains to be known, about the linkages between people and nature that both define and depend upon the state of the environment. To guide research that better informs policy and practice, we systematically synthesize knowledge gaps from recent assessments of four regions of the globe and three key themes by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. We assess their relevance to global sustainability goals and trace their evolution relative to those identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We found that global sustainability goals cannot be achieved without improved knowledge on feedbacks between social and ecological systems, effectiveness of governance systems and the influence of institutions on the social distribution of ecosystem services. These top research priorities have persisted for the 14 years since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Our analysis also reveals limited understanding of the role of indigenous and local knowledge in sustaining nature’s benefits to people. Our findings contribute to a policy-relevant and solution-oriented agenda for global, long-term social-ecological research.
AB - Regional and global assessments periodically update what we know, and highlight what remains to be known, about the linkages between people and nature that both define and depend upon the state of the environment. To guide research that better informs policy and practice, we systematically synthesize knowledge gaps from recent assessments of four regions of the globe and three key themes by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. We assess their relevance to global sustainability goals and trace their evolution relative to those identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We found that global sustainability goals cannot be achieved without improved knowledge on feedbacks between social and ecological systems, effectiveness of governance systems and the influence of institutions on the social distribution of ecosystem services. These top research priorities have persisted for the 14 years since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Our analysis also reveals limited understanding of the role of indigenous and local knowledge in sustaining nature’s benefits to people. Our findings contribute to a policy-relevant and solution-oriented agenda for global, long-term social-ecological research.
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - biodiversity
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - policy
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074662634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1
DO - 10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 2
SP - 1115
EP - 1121
JO - Nature Sustainability
JF - Nature Sustainability
SN - 2398-9629
IS - 12
ER -