Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations. / Petrowsky, Hannes M.; Schweinsberg, Martin; Seitz, Lennart et al.
In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 94, 102584, 01.01.2023.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f8f60f607c8d4bff8877b48f78d31b65,
title = "Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations",
abstract = "Negotiations can end with a successful deal or with an impasse. To minimize the impasse risk, how assertive and precise should negotiators{\textquoteright} first offers be? Recent studies diverge in their findings as to the advantages and disadvantages of making round vs precise offers. Based on over 25 million eBay negotiations, the present research establishes correlational evidence that buyer offers at round percentages of the seller's list price—for instance, exactly 50% (75%, 90%, etc.)—coincide with a markedly smaller impasse risk than offers just above (e.g., 50.1%) or just below (49.9%) these round percentages. We also find that buyers who mimic sellers{\textquoteright} list price precision (e.g., offering $89.95 for a product listed at $99.99) and exact price endings ($30.13 for a list price of $40.13) incur markedly smaller impasse risks. Our findings show that the effectiveness of buyers{\textquoteright} round vs precise offers depends on the roundness of the seller's list price, therefore extending previous research that focused on offer precision without taking the opponent's list price into account. We discuss promising avenues for future research on the interpersonal effects of offer precision and price-ending mimicry.",
keywords = "Impasse, Mimicry, Negotiation, Numeric precision, Offer, Business informatics, Management studies, Business psychology",
author = "Petrowsky, {Hannes M.} and Martin Schweinsberg and Lennart Seitz and Burkhardt Funk and Loschelder, {David D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2022.102584",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deal or no deal? How round vs precise percentage offers and price-ending mimicry affect impasse risk in over 25 million eBay negotiations

AU - Petrowsky, Hannes M.

AU - Schweinsberg, Martin

AU - Seitz, Lennart

AU - Funk, Burkhardt

AU - Loschelder, David D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2023/1/1

Y1 - 2023/1/1

N2 - Negotiations can end with a successful deal or with an impasse. To minimize the impasse risk, how assertive and precise should negotiators’ first offers be? Recent studies diverge in their findings as to the advantages and disadvantages of making round vs precise offers. Based on over 25 million eBay negotiations, the present research establishes correlational evidence that buyer offers at round percentages of the seller's list price—for instance, exactly 50% (75%, 90%, etc.)—coincide with a markedly smaller impasse risk than offers just above (e.g., 50.1%) or just below (49.9%) these round percentages. We also find that buyers who mimic sellers’ list price precision (e.g., offering $89.95 for a product listed at $99.99) and exact price endings ($30.13 for a list price of $40.13) incur markedly smaller impasse risks. Our findings show that the effectiveness of buyers’ round vs precise offers depends on the roundness of the seller's list price, therefore extending previous research that focused on offer precision without taking the opponent's list price into account. We discuss promising avenues for future research on the interpersonal effects of offer precision and price-ending mimicry.

AB - Negotiations can end with a successful deal or with an impasse. To minimize the impasse risk, how assertive and precise should negotiators’ first offers be? Recent studies diverge in their findings as to the advantages and disadvantages of making round vs precise offers. Based on over 25 million eBay negotiations, the present research establishes correlational evidence that buyer offers at round percentages of the seller's list price—for instance, exactly 50% (75%, 90%, etc.)—coincide with a markedly smaller impasse risk than offers just above (e.g., 50.1%) or just below (49.9%) these round percentages. We also find that buyers who mimic sellers’ list price precision (e.g., offering $89.95 for a product listed at $99.99) and exact price endings ($30.13 for a list price of $40.13) incur markedly smaller impasse risks. Our findings show that the effectiveness of buyers’ round vs precise offers depends on the roundness of the seller's list price, therefore extending previous research that focused on offer precision without taking the opponent's list price into account. We discuss promising avenues for future research on the interpersonal effects of offer precision and price-ending mimicry.

KW - Impasse

KW - Mimicry

KW - Negotiation

KW - Numeric precision

KW - Offer

KW - Business informatics

KW - Management studies

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143508165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2022.102584

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2022.102584

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85143508165

VL - 94

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

M1 - 102584

ER -