Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Assiciation - AERA 2018

Activity: Talk or presentationConference PresentationsResearch

Susanne Narciss - Speaker

Carolin Schuster - Speaker

    Student Gender and Teachers' Grading and Written Feedback on Math or Language Assignments

    Purpose and Framework There are robust gender differences in seeking, attending to and processing evaluative feedback (Author, 2014; Paper 1). One contributing factor might be teachers’ gender-typed perceptions of student achievements and their ways of evaluating boys and girls (e.g., Upadyaya & Eccles, 2014; Hofer, 2015). We present two studies designed to address two main questions: Does gender influence teachers’ grades and written feedback in math and language, such that teachers expect more from students and thus grade them more harshly in stereotypically gender-congruent domains and provide less written feedback in “non-congruent” domains? Are any differences conditional upon teachers’ gender stereotype endorsement and motivation to be non-prejudiced? Methods In two experimental studies, preservice teachers graded student assignments in mathematics and German and provided written feedback comments. Gender was manipulated by assigning male and female names. We also assessed teacher gender stereotype endorsement and motivation to be non-prejudiced. Assignment items were based on school curricula and items in national studies of math and German proficiency (VERA-Test-Items). Performance across conditions was designed to reflect a moderate level of proficiency; number and types of errors were kept as similar as possible. In Study 1 (N = 223) participants graded and commented on an assignment ostensibly from third-graders; we manipulated student gender and domain between participants. Study 2 (N = 130) used a within-subject design to examine whether the same teachers responded differently to boys and girls. Teachers graded either math or German assignments of four students (2 girls, and 2 boys in fourth grade). Results In Study 1 teachers did not grade boys and girls differently. However, as predicted, in German, gender and stereotype endorsement interacted, such that teachers who believed more strongly that girls are better at language graded girls more harshly than boys. There was a non-significant tendency in the opposite direction for higher stereotype endorsement to be associated with harsher grading of boys in math. In Study 2 a significant effect for gender whereby teachers graded boys significantly more harshly in math was moderated by a significant interaction with motivation to be non-prejudiced: participants who were more motivated to be non-prejudiced gave higher grades to girls. In Study 1, but not Study 2, girls received more feedback in math and boys more in German. Feedback also varied as a function of teacher grading: in the case of high and low grades, comments were short and global, while for intermediate grades comments were more elaborated. Significance Discussion will focus on the role of teachers’ beliefs in their differential treatment of boys and girls, on ways to modify such beliefs, and on the benefits and costs of biased grades and written feedback for students’ self-views and learning. For example, elaborated feedback is useful for learning, but might also convey that there is much room for improvement. Conversely, brief feedback might convey that the teacher does not expect improvement. Grading students more harshly and providing more elaborated feedback in stereotypically gender-congruent versus incongruent domains might thus influence students’ domain-specific self-concepts and learning.

    Sprecherin: Susanne Narciss
    14.04.2018

    Event

    Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Assiciation - AERA 2018: "The Dreams, Possibilities, and Necessity of Public Education."

    13.04.1817.04.18

    New York, United States

    Event: Conference

    Recently viewed

    Publications

    1. Efficacy of a web-based intervention with and without guidance for employees with risky drinking
    2. Temporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services
    3. Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning for Sustainable Development
    4. Making an impression with open strategy
    5. An Approach for Ex-Post-Facto Analysis of Knowledge Graph-Driven Chatbots – The DBpedia Chatbot
    6. Towards an Extended Enterprise Architecture Meta-Model for Big Data
    7. Rapid ecosystem change challenges the adaptive capacity of local environmental knowledge
    8. Determinants of fair own wage perceptions
    9. In situ synchrotron radiation diffraction during solidification of Mgl5Gd
    10. Why the measurement of species diversity requires prior value judgements
    11. Three schools of transformation thinking
    12. Co-production of nature's contributions to people
    13. Systemanalyse für Softwaresysteme
    14. Feld oder Assemblage?
    15. Methods and compositions relating to a vaccine against prostate cancer
    16. Fostering pre-service teachers’ knowledge of ‘teaching games for understanding’ via video-based vs. text-based teaching examples
    17. Rethinking art's relation to its social context: the example of the Artist Placement Group
    18. A Review on Higher Education for Sustainable Development - Looking Back and Moving Forward
    19. Regulation of morally responsible agents with motivation crowding
    20. Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials
    21. Dialectical conditions
    22. Fettflecken untersuchen mit Graphical Analysis
    23. Preference Organization and Cross-Cultural Variation in Request Responses: A Corpus-Based Comparison of British and American English
    24. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Policy
    25. Umweltrechtsschutz in China
    26. Let’s Team Up with AI! Toward a Hybrid Intelligence System for Online Customer Service
    27. Using structure biodegradability relationships for environmentally benign design of organosilicons – An experimental comparison of organosilicons and their carbon analogues
    28. Globalization and the societal consensus of wealth tax cuts
    29. Pragmatic Competence in EIL
    30. Context, contexts and appropriateness
    31. Refugee Entrepreneurship and Organizing Social Integration: Insights from Organizational Theory
    32. Ist Cola sauer?
    33. Dogmatics
    34. Networking
    35. Experimentieren mit Modellen
    36. Soziologische Aspekte des Spiels