Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management. / Schmidt, Katja; Martín-López, Berta; Phillips, Peter M. et al.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 82, 01.03.2019, S. 353-366.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schmidt K, Martín-López B, Phillips PM, Julius E, Makan N, Walz A. Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management. Land Use Policy. 2019 Mär 1;82:353-366. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022

Bibtex

@article{40d01af74e9a487b980212815bfd7d7f,
title = "Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management",
abstract = "Whereas ecosystem service research is increasingly being promoted in science and policy, the utilisation of ecosystem services knowledge remains largely underexplored for regional ecosystem management. To overcome the mere generation of knowledge and contribute to decision-making, scientists are facing the challenge of articulating specific implications of the ecosystem service approach for practical land use management. In this contribution, we compare the results of participatory mapping of ecosystem services with the existing management plan for the Pentland Hills Regional Park (Scotland, UK) to inform its future management plan. By conducting participatory mapping in a workshop with key stakeholders (n = 20), we identify hotspots of ecosystem services and the landscape features underpinning such hotspots. We then analyse to what extent these landscape features are the focus of the current management plan. We found a clear mismatch between the key landscape features underpinning the provision of ecosystem services and the management strategy suggested. Our findings allow for a better understanding of the required focus of future land use management to account for ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Content analysis, Land use management, Landscape features, Operationalisation, Participatory mapping, PPGIS, Sustainability Science, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Katja Schmidt and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Phillips, {Peter M.} and Eike Julius and Neville Makan and Ariane Walz",
note = "The authors would like to thank Jenny Hargreaves and Chris Alcorn for their support in setting up the stakeholder workshop. In addition we would like to thank all participants of the workshop. The workshop was funded by Scottish Natural Heritage to support the PHRP authorities in developing and adopting a collaborative approach to land use and management in the park. KS and AW were financially supported by the European Union{\textquoteright}s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 308393 ({\textquoteleft}OPERAs{\textquoteright}) and the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 641762 ({\textquoteleft}ECOPOTENTIAL{\textquoteright}). ",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "353--366",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services

T2 - Insights for management

AU - Schmidt, Katja

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Phillips, Peter M.

AU - Julius, Eike

AU - Makan, Neville

AU - Walz, Ariane

N1 - The authors would like to thank Jenny Hargreaves and Chris Alcorn for their support in setting up the stakeholder workshop. In addition we would like to thank all participants of the workshop. The workshop was funded by Scottish Natural Heritage to support the PHRP authorities in developing and adopting a collaborative approach to land use and management in the park. KS and AW were financially supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 308393 (‘OPERAs’) and the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 641762 (‘ECOPOTENTIAL’).

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Whereas ecosystem service research is increasingly being promoted in science and policy, the utilisation of ecosystem services knowledge remains largely underexplored for regional ecosystem management. To overcome the mere generation of knowledge and contribute to decision-making, scientists are facing the challenge of articulating specific implications of the ecosystem service approach for practical land use management. In this contribution, we compare the results of participatory mapping of ecosystem services with the existing management plan for the Pentland Hills Regional Park (Scotland, UK) to inform its future management plan. By conducting participatory mapping in a workshop with key stakeholders (n = 20), we identify hotspots of ecosystem services and the landscape features underpinning such hotspots. We then analyse to what extent these landscape features are the focus of the current management plan. We found a clear mismatch between the key landscape features underpinning the provision of ecosystem services and the management strategy suggested. Our findings allow for a better understanding of the required focus of future land use management to account for ecosystem services.

AB - Whereas ecosystem service research is increasingly being promoted in science and policy, the utilisation of ecosystem services knowledge remains largely underexplored for regional ecosystem management. To overcome the mere generation of knowledge and contribute to decision-making, scientists are facing the challenge of articulating specific implications of the ecosystem service approach for practical land use management. In this contribution, we compare the results of participatory mapping of ecosystem services with the existing management plan for the Pentland Hills Regional Park (Scotland, UK) to inform its future management plan. By conducting participatory mapping in a workshop with key stakeholders (n = 20), we identify hotspots of ecosystem services and the landscape features underpinning such hotspots. We then analyse to what extent these landscape features are the focus of the current management plan. We found a clear mismatch between the key landscape features underpinning the provision of ecosystem services and the management strategy suggested. Our findings allow for a better understanding of the required focus of future land use management to account for ecosystem services.

KW - Content analysis

KW - Land use management

KW - Landscape features

KW - Operationalisation

KW - Participatory mapping

KW - PPGIS

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058786265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.022

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85058786265

VL - 82

SP - 353

EP - 366

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Seidl I. & Zahrnt A.: Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft
  2. Atomkonsens II könnte Element zukunftsweisender Energiepolitik sein
  3. The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading
  4. Intensity of Time and Income Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty:
  5. Einleitung: Blumers Rebellion 2.0: Eine Wissenschaft der Interpretation
  6. Aligning the design of intermediary organisations with the ecosystem
  7. Vom Integrated Coastal Zone Management zum Coastal Energy Management
  8. Bernward Halbscheffel: Progressive Rock. Die Ernste Musik der Popmusik.
  9. Sensory Perception of Non-Deuterated and Deuterated Organic Compounds
  10. Digital Workplace Transformation Triggers a Shift in the HR Identity
  11. Neue Gaspipelines und Flüssiggas-Terminals sind in Europa überflüssig
  12. Exploring the Corporate Reality of Sustainability Accounting Practice
  13. Role-Determined Information Needs of Sustainability Management Control
  14. Sprachliche Prozeduren beim fachlichen Lernen: Begründen in Mathematik
  15. The Bali Convention: flexibility of targets and instruments inevitable
  16. Planning for Sea Spaces I: Processes, Practices and Future Perspectives
  17. Spatial and seasonal distribution of trace metals in floodplain soils
  18. Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit einer Sustainability Balanced Scorecard
  19. Neugestaltung urbaner Freiräume – Einblicke in das Reallabor Wuppertal
  20. Der Beschluss des Bundeskartellamts in Sachen Springer - ProSiebenSat.1
  21. Control of a Three-Axis Robot with Super Twisting Sliding Mode Control
  22. Marktdesign für eine effiziente Netzanbindung von Offshore-Windenergie
  23. Solarenergie im Jemen-Konflikt: Entwicklungen, Herausforderungen, Chancen
  24. Microstructural evolution of Mg–14Gd–0.4Zr alloy during compressive creep
  25. Unternehmerische Verantwortungsübernahme für gesellschaftlichen Nutzen
  26. Deutschunterricht zwischen Kompetenzerwerb und Persönlichkeitsbildung
  27. Comedy in Serie : medienwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf ein TV-Format
  28. Climate protection requirements - The economic impact of climate change
  29. Persistente organische Schadstoffe in Flusssedimenten Norddeutschlands
  30. Kult(ur)serien: Produktion, Inhalt und Publikum im looking-glass television