Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. / Oehl, Michael; Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger.
Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. ed. / P. Kommers; G. Richards. Vol. 3 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2005. p. 2098-2109.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Oehl, M & Pfister, H-R 2005, Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. in P Kommers & G Richards (eds), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. vol. 3, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 2098-2109, ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada, 27.06.05. <http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/>

APA

Oehl, M., & Pfister, H.-R. (2005). Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. In P. Kommers, & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (Vol. 3, pp. 2098-2109). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/

Vancouver

Oehl M, Pfister HR. Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. In Kommers P, Richards G, editors, Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Vol. 3. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 2005. p. 2098-2109

Bibtex

@inbook{3c758e213137457d9d85fd87d5bc5c5d,
title = "Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives",
abstract = "The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Knowledge acquisition, learning outcomes, Problem solving",
author = "Michael Oehl and Hans-R{\"u}diger Pfister",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-880094-56-3",
volume = "3",
pages = "2098--2109",
editor = "P. Kommers and G. Richards",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005",
publisher = "Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education",
address = "Australia",
note = "ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications, ED-MEDIA 2005 ; Conference date: 27-06-2005 Through 02-07-2005",
url = "https://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/future-past/, http://www.learntechlib.org/j/EDMEDIA/",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

AU - Oehl, Michael

AU - Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger

N1 - Conference code: 9

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

AB - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Knowledge acquisition

KW - learning outcomes

KW - Problem solving

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 978-1-880094-56-3

VL - 3

SP - 2098

EP - 2109

BT - Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005

A2 - Kommers, P.

A2 - Richards, G.

PB - Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

T2 - ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications

Y2 - 27 June 2005 through 2 July 2005

ER -

Links

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Zhiyong Xie

Publications

  1. The elicitation process in developing of case library for Case-Based Reasoner system whilst consideration for validating electronic communication technologies
  2. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Students’ Self-report Checklist of Social and Learning Behaviour (SSL)
  3. Reciprocal Relationships Between Dispositional Optimism and Work Experiences
  4. Changing Data Collection Methods Means Different Kind of Data
  5. Modeling of lateness distributions depending on the sequencing method with respect to productivity effects
  6. Vergütung, variable
  7. 8th challenge on question answering over linked data (QALD-8)
  8. Intellectual property issues in the use and distribution of remote sensing data
  9. Highly Efficient IPT Transmitter Circuit Based on a Novel Enhanced Class B Amplifier for Consumer Applications
  10. The model of educational reconstruction: A framework for the design of theory-based content specific interventions
  11. A cascade controller structure using an internal PID controller for a hybrid piezo-hydraulic actuator in camless internal combustion engines
  12. Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved
  13. Temporal dynamics of conflict monitoring and the effects of one or two conflict sources on error-(related) negativity
  14. Exploiting ConvNet diversity for flooding identification
  15. A latent state-trait analysis of current achievement motivation across different tasks of cognitive ability
  16. Hybrid models for future event prediction
  17. Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second-Language Multimedia Learning Environment
  18. Anomalous Results in G-Factor Models
  19. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services
  20. The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance
  21. Technical concept and evaluation design of the state subsidized project [Level-Q]
  22. Parametric finite element model and mechanical characterisation of electrospun materials for biomedical applications
  23. Intraspecific trait variation increases species diversity in a trait-based grassland model
  24. Predicting the Individual Mood Level based on Diary Data
  25. How do students and teachers deal with mathematical modelling problems?
  26. Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions
  27. Differences in the sophistication of Value-based Management
  28. Machine vision system errors for unmanned aerial vehicle navigation
  29. Detection of significant tracer gases by means of polymer gas sensors
  30. Improve a 3D distance measurement accuracy in stereo vision systems using optimization methods’ approach
  31. Visual-Inertial Navigation Systems and Technologies
  32. Defining the notion of mining, extraction and collection
  33. Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social-ecological resilience