Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. / Oehl, Michael; Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger.
Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Hrsg. / P. Kommers; G. Richards. Band 3 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2005. S. 2098-2109.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Oehl, M & Pfister, H-R 2005, Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. in P Kommers & G Richards (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Bd. 3, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, S. 2098-2109, ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Kanada, 27.06.05. <http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/>

APA

Oehl, M., & Pfister, H.-R. (2005). Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. In P. Kommers, & G. Richards (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (Band 3, S. 2098-2109). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/

Vancouver

Oehl M, Pfister HR. Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. in Kommers P, Richards G, Hrsg., Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Band 3. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 2005. S. 2098-2109

Bibtex

@inbook{3c758e213137457d9d85fd87d5bc5c5d,
title = "Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives",
abstract = "The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Knowledge acquisition, learning outcomes, Problem solving",
author = "Michael Oehl and Hans-R{\"u}diger Pfister",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-880094-56-3",
volume = "3",
pages = "2098--2109",
editor = "P. Kommers and G. Richards",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005",
publisher = "Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education",
address = "Australia",
note = "ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications, ED-MEDIA 2005 ; Conference date: 27-06-2005 Through 02-07-2005",
url = "https://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/future-past/, http://www.learntechlib.org/j/EDMEDIA/",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

AU - Oehl, Michael

AU - Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger

N1 - Conference code: 9

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

AB - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Knowledge acquisition

KW - learning outcomes

KW - Problem solving

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 978-1-880094-56-3

VL - 3

SP - 2098

EP - 2109

BT - Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005

A2 - Kommers, P.

A2 - Richards, G.

PB - Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

T2 - ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications

Y2 - 27 June 2005 through 2 July 2005

ER -

Links

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Using Fuzzy PD Controllers for Soft Motions in a Car-like Robot
  2. An evaluation of BPR methodologies adopting NIMSAD: A systematic framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies
  3. An analytical approach to evaluating monotonic functions of fuzzy numbers
  4. GENESIS - A generic RDF data access interface
  5. Advantages and Disadvanteges of Different Text Coding Procedures for Research and Practice in a School Context
  6. An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation
  7. ENVISIONING PROTECTED AREAS THROUGH PARTICIPATORY SCENARIO PLANNING: NAVIGATING COVERAGE AND EFFECTIVENESS CHALLENGES AHEAD
  8. Exploring Leverages and Pitfalls of Context Collapse in Modern Communication
  9. Biodiversity in space and time - towards a grid mapping for Mongolia
  10. Neural correlates of own name and own face processing in neurotypical adults scoring low versus high on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder
  11. Challenging the status quo of accelerator research: Concluding remarks
  12. Behavior in the context of control
  13. Explaining Disagreement on Interest Rates in a Taylor-Rule Setting
  14. The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning
  15. Computational history of knowledge
  16. Instruments for research on transition. Applied methods and approaches for exploring the transition of young care leavers to adulthood
  17. Working memory capacity and narrative task performance
  18. “Smart is not smart enough!” Anticipating critical raw material use in smart city concepts
  19. From teacher-centered instruction to peer tutoring in the heterogeneous international classroom
  20. Predator diversity and abundance provide little support for the enemies hypothesis in forests of high tree diversity
  21. Tracing Concepts
  22. Introduction
  23. Maschinenbelegungsplanung mit evolutionären Algorithmen
  24. Cross-hedging minimum return guarantees
  25. Atmospheric gas-particle partitioning versus gaseous/particle-bound deposition of SVOCs
  26. Importance of timing
  27. Article 21 Formal Validity
  28. Facing complex crime
  29. Mouseology – Ludic Interfaces – Zero Interfaces
  30. A(l)gora: the Mindscape