Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. / Oehl, Michael; Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger.
Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Hrsg. / P. Kommers; G. Richards. Band 3 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2005. S. 2098-2109.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Oehl, M & Pfister, H-R 2005, Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. in P Kommers & G Richards (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Bd. 3, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, S. 2098-2109, ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Kanada, 27.06.05. <http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/>

APA

Oehl, M., & Pfister, H.-R. (2005). Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. In P. Kommers, & G. Richards (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (Band 3, S. 2098-2109). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. http://www.editlib.org/p/20382/

Vancouver

Oehl M, Pfister HR. Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives. in Kommers P, Richards G, Hrsg., Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Band 3. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 2005. S. 2098-2109

Bibtex

@inbook{3c758e213137457d9d85fd87d5bc5c5d,
title = "Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives",
abstract = "The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.",
keywords = "Business psychology, Knowledge acquisition, learning outcomes, Problem solving",
author = "Michael Oehl and Hans-R{\"u}diger Pfister",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-880094-56-3",
volume = "3",
pages = "2098--2109",
editor = "P. Kommers and G. Richards",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005",
publisher = "Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education",
address = "Australia",
note = "ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications, ED-MEDIA 2005 ; Conference date: 27-06-2005 Through 02-07-2005",
url = "https://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/future-past/, http://www.learntechlib.org/j/EDMEDIA/",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using learning protocols for knowledge acquisition and problem solving with individual and group incentives

AU - Oehl, Michael

AU - Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger

N1 - Conference code: 9

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

AB - The learning protocol approach implements cooperation scripts as automated discourse rules into a net-based learning environment. The purpose of learning protocols is to improve learning outcomes of distributed learning groups by imposing structure on the learning discourse. The main features of learning protocols are a referencing function, a typing function, and a predefined sequence of contributions. Previous work has shown that learning protocols can improve learning performance; however, it is still unclear which conditions are advantageous and which conditions are disadvantageous. We investigate experimentally a learning protocol with respect to two kinds of tasks, knowledge acquisition versus problem solving, and with respect to two motivational conditions, individual versus group incentives. Results indicate that learning protocols are more advantageous if the learning goal is knowledge acquisition as compared to problem solving; this effect is moderated by group size. Motivational conditions, however, do not influence learning performance.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Knowledge acquisition

KW - learning outcomes

KW - Problem solving

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 978-1-880094-56-3

VL - 3

SP - 2098

EP - 2109

BT - Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005

A2 - Kommers, P.

A2 - Richards, G.

PB - Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

T2 - ED-MEDIA 2005 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia &amp; Telecommunications

Y2 - 27 June 2005 through 2 July 2005

ER -

Links

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. A Lean Convolutional Neural Network for Vehicle Classification
  2. An extended analytical approach to evaluating monotonic functions of fuzzy numbers
  3. Effects of diversity versus segregation on automatic approach and avoidance behavior towards own and other ethnic groups
  4. Developing a Complex Portrait of Content Teaching for Multilingual Learners via Nonlinear Theoretical Understandings
  5. Support vector machines with example dependent costs
  6. The structure of emotions in learning situations
  7. Reciprocal Relationships Between Dispositional Optimism and Work Experiences
  8. Conceptualizing Role Development in Agile Transformations
  9. Predicate‐based model of problem‐solving for robotic actions planning
  10. Vergütung, variable
  11. Sensitivity to complexity - an important prerequisite of problem solving mathematics teaching
  12. Study of fuzzy controllers performance
  13. Performance Saga: Interview 01
  14. Employing A-B tests for optimizing prices levels in e-commerce applications
  15. An analytical approach to evaluating nonmonotonic functions of fuzzy numbers
  16. Between Recognition and Abstraction
  17. Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved
  18. The Relation of Children's Performances in Spatial Tasks at Two Different Scales of Space
  19. Petri net based EMIS-mappers for flexible manufacturing systems
  20. Schooling, local knowledge and working memory
  21. Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices
  22. Scaling-based Least Squares Methods with Implemented Kalman filter Approach for Nano-Parameters Identification
  23. Fusion of knowledge bases for better navigation of wheeled mobile robotic group with 3D TVS
  24. Learning linear classifiers sensitive to example dependent and noisy costs
  25. Model and Validation of the Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Power Transmission Lines in Robotic Systems
  26. Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities
  27. Mapping the Order of New Migration
  28. Geometric analysis of a laser scanner functioning based on dynamic triangulation
  29. Challenging the status quo of accelerator research: Concluding remarks