Mapping perceptions of energy transition pathways: Ascribed motives and effectiveness

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

This study examines how people perceive possible pathways of a societal transition towards less carbon intensive means of energy production and use. Data were collected with questionnaires among samples of university students in Norway (N = 106) and Germany (N = 142). Participants selected from a set of 15 motives those which they considered to be strongly associated with each of 25 pathways, including examples such as public transportation and nuclear power. Participants also rated the effectiveness of each single pathway, that is, their perceived impact on climate change. Results indicate that the various pathways were associated with specific motives; for example, individual actions such as taking public transportation were closely associated with a self-restraint motive, pathways such as nuclear power and market strategies such as carbon offsets were closely associated with motives supporting free market and progress, and technological solutions such as solar panels and hydro power were associated with the motive for sufficient energy supply. The German and the Norwegian sample did not differ markedly in which pathways were associated with which motives; nor did effectiveness ratings for pathways differ between samples. Solar panels, wind farms, and hydropower were on average regarded as having a mitigating impact on climate change, whereas nuclear power was on average considered to have no mitigating impact. The findings are discussed in the context of public engagement with several of the suggested pathways, noting differences in perceptual patterns across samples.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume42
Issue number20
Pages (from-to)16661-16673
Number of pages13
ISSN1046-1310
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2023

Bibliographical note

This research was supported by grants from the cooperation agreement between Statoil and the University of Bergen (Akademiaavtale; Project No. 803589) and from a research scholarship awarded to the first author (E.ON Stipendienfonds; Project No. T0087/29897/17). Data collection for the Norwegian sample was conducted at the computer lab (Citizen Lab) of the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the University of Bergen. We thank Annika Rødeseike for assistance in running these lab sessions and in developing the study materials. Preliminary results were presented at the International Conference on Environmental Psychology (ICEP) 2019, Plymouth (UK), 4-6 September.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

    Research areas

  • Climate change, Cross-national, Effectiveness, Energy transition, Mental representation, Motives
  • Business psychology

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Disentangling who is who during rhizosphere acidification in root interactions: combining fluorescence with optode techniques
  2. Polar Coordinates and Interactive Learning
  3. Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions:
  4. Performance Saga: Interview 01
  5. Learning shortest paths in word graphs
  6. Phase Shift APOD and POD Control Technique in Multi-Level Inverters to Mitigate Total Harmonic Distortion
  7. Design of an Over-Actuated Hexacopter Tilt-Rotor for Landing and Coupling in Power Transmission Lines
  8. Enforcement concepts and strategies in the EU
  9. A trait-based framework linking the soil metabolome to plant–soil feedbacks
  10. Putting adaptive planning into practice: A meta-analysis of current applications
  11. Study on AZ31 magnesium alloy-based surface composite through friction stir processing
  12. Temporal discrimination as a function of marker duration
  13. Simulation-based Investigation of Energy Flexibility in the Optimization of Hinterland Drainage
  14. PI Control Applied to a Small-Scale Thermal System with Heating and Cooling Sources
  15. Representative time use data and new harmonised calibration of the American Heritage Time Use Data (AHTUD) 1965-1999
  16. Analog, Digital, and the Cybernetic Illusion
  17. Red List of marine macroalgae of the Wadden Sea
  18. The feasibility of using Apple's ResearchKit for recruitment and data collection
  19. Forest gaps increase true bug diversity by recruiting open land species
  20. Changing learning environments at university?
  21. Formulating and solving integrated order batching and routing in multi-depot AGV-assisted mixed-shelves warehouses
  22. Where Tasks, Technology, and Textbooks Meet: An Exploratory Analysis of English Language Teachers’ Perceived Affordances of an Intelligent Language Tutoring System
  23. Managing and accounting for corporate biodiversity contributions mapping the field
  24. Foundations for the Development of Simulator-based Training for Older Professional Drivers
  25. Excludable and non-excludable public inputs
  26. Resource Allocation in Startup Teams: Exploring Entrepreneurial Coping with Radical Uncertainty during the Corona Pandemic
  27. The Supply of Project Information to External Stakeholders
  28. The dynamics of humanistic and biospheric altruism in conflicting choice environments
  29. Mind the Gap!
  30. Group evaluations as self-group distancing
  31. Exploring the Hidden Curriculum in Responsible Management Education
  32. An Off-the-shelf Approach to Authorship Attribution
  33. Promoting Navigation Health Literacy at the Intersection of Schools and Communities. Development of the Game-Based Intervention Nebolus
  34. The Importance of Citizen Scientists in the Move Towards Sustainable Diets and a Sustainable Food System
  35. Schreibberatung
  36. Economic Analysis of Recycling Solutions to Exploit Plastic Pollution in Oceans
  37. Effective working hours and wages
  38. Cognitive verbs in discourse
  39. Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Laparatomy Pads
  40. Participation in protected area governance
  41. When being a bad friend doesn't hurt
  42. Multitrophic arthropod diversity mediates tree diversity effects on primary productivity
  43. Organic Synthesis – Art or Science?