Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Gisela Böhm
  • Hans Rüdiger Pfister
  • Rouven Doran
  • Charles A. Ogunbode
  • Wouter Poortinga
  • Endre Tvinnereim
  • Katharine Steentjes
  • Claire Mays
  • Raquel Bertoldo
  • Marco Sonnberger
  • Nicholas Pidgeon

We present a study of emotional reactions to climate change utilizing representative samples from France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion, we examine relations between appraisals, emotions, and behavioral intentions in the context of climate change. We compare the four countries concerning emotional differences and commonalities and relate our findings to pertinent models of cultural values. Five distinct emotions were measured: worry, hope, fear, outrage, and guilt. In addition, the survey asked respondents to appraise a set of climate-related statements, such as the causality of climate change, or the efficacy of mitigation efforts. Also, a set of climate-relevant actions, such as willingness to reduce energy consumption or support for climate policies, was assessed. Findings show that appraisals of human causation and moral concern were associated with worry and outrage, and appraisals of efficacy and technological solutions were associated with hope. Worry and outrage are associated with intentions to reduce one’s energy consumption, whereas hope and guilt are related to support for policies such as tax and price increases. A country comparison shows that French respondents score high on outrage and worry and tend to engage in individual behaviors to mitigate climate change, whereas Norwegian respondents score high on hope and show a tendency to support policies of cost increase. Generally, worry is the most and guilt the least intense emotion. Moral concerns and perceived collective efficacy of one’s country in addressing climate change are relatively strong in France, while beliefs in human causation and in negative impacts of climate change prevail in Germany, and confidence in technological solutions are prevalent in Norway. In sum, findings reveal typical patterns of emotional responses in the four countries and confirm systematic associations between emotions and appraisals as well as between emotions and behaviors. Relating these findings to models of cultural values reveals that Norway, endorsing secular and egalitarian values, is characterized by hope and confidence in technological solutions, whereas France and Germany, emphasizing relatively more hierarchical and traditional values, are rather characterized by fear, outrage, and support for behavioral restrictions imposed by climate change policies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1139133
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume14
Number of pages23
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.07.2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Böhm, Pfister, Doran, Ogunbode, Poortinga, Tvinnereim, Steentjes, Mays, Bertoldo, Sonnberger and Pidgeon.

    Research areas

  • appraisal theories, climate change, cross-national comparison, emotions, environmental behavior, risk perception, sustainability
  • Business psychology

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Wie unterstützt eine Schulinspektion die Entwicklung schulischer Qualität? Aufbereitung von Daten zur Ergebnisrückmeldung in der Praxis.
  2. Post Hoc Assessment of Stand Structure Across European Wood-Pastures
  3. Schulinspektion in Hamburg
  4. A grassroots initiative to disseminate solar energy technologies in Ethiopia
  5. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits
  6. Ästhetik der Reorganisation. Zur Einleitung
  7. Fusionsprotein und dessen Verwendungen
  8. Aneignung – diskursive Erweiterungen und Reflexionen
  9. Wirtschaftsinformatik
  10. Öffentlichkeiten
  11. Editorial:
  12. The Curator as Arts Administrator ?
  13. Geplagter Hiob
  14. Islam and Patriarchy
  15. Individuelle Beteiligung am Unterrichtsgespräch in Grundschulklassen
  16. Gene tests and employees in an international comparison.
  17. In a no-win situation
  18. Andocken
  19. Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention im Setting Schule
  20. Does online availability increase citations?
  21. Response to comment on "Screening criteria for long-range transport potential of organic substances in water"
  22. Reversible formation of alcohol solvates and their potential use for heat storage
  23. »ein Gespräch, an dem wir würgen«. Celan und Heidegger
  24. Öffentliche Beschaffung nachhaltig gestalten
  25. Open to Offers, but Resisting Requests
  26. European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): Study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries
  27. I am medial!
  28. Mindset-Oriented Negotiation Training (MONT)
  29. Life expectancy, family constellation and stress in giant mole-rats (Fukomys mechowii)
  30. A Leverage Points Perspective on Sustainability
  31. Hybrid Regionalism in Africa Towards a Theory of African Union Interventions
  32. "Wie getrennt zusammenleben?
  33. Mental contrasting and energization transfer to low-expectancy tasks
  34. Mexican school students’ perceptions of inclusion
  35. Umweltgerichte in China
  36. § 846 Mitverschulden des Verletzten
  37. Games People (Don’t) Play
  38. Zwischen Methodenpluralismus und Datenhandel
  39. Das Bildungssystem in den 1990er Jahren. Am Beginn einer Zeitenwende
  40. Nachhaltigkeitskompetenzen in Unternehmen und Organisationen
  41. A guide to the Harry Potter novels
  42. Sustainability Accounting and Reporting
  43. Prioritize grassland restoration to bend the curve of biodiversity loss
  44. Organisation fur wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (OECD)
  45. The impact of chief executive officer narcissism on environmental, social, and governance reporting