Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Johanna Jacobi
  • Aymara Llanque
  • Stellah M. Mukhovi
  • Eliud Abucheli Birachi
  • Per Maximilian von Groote
  • René Eschen
  • I. Hilber-Schöb
  • D. I. Kiba
  • Emmanuel Frossard
  • Carmenza Robledo-Abad

Our study aimed at understanding the utilization of research knowledge generated in sustainable development research. Drawing on a sample of 54 recent research projects, we investigated how and by whom the knowledge was used, what changes were achieved, and how non-academic actors were involved. As a conceptual framework we combined a concept of “stages of knowledge utilization” with a spiral model that co-creates three forms of knowledge – systems knowledge, target knowledge, and transformation knowledge, and which spans from joint problem definition to concrete sustainability transformations. We analysed questionnaires from 94 academic and non-academic actors using cross-tabulation, chi-squared tests, and qualitative content analysis. The early involvement of non-academic actors from key groups such as local enterprises was positively related to the utilization of research knowledge, as was their involvement in diverse roles. However, only little of the research knowledge generated has so far resulted in changes in policy and practice, partly because sustainability transformations are larger societal processes. Utilization of research knowledge for sustainability transformations cannot be achieved without employing a transdisciplinary approach that brings together academic and non-academic actors in a setting that enables discussions on an even footing and the empowering of actors who are often not heard. In such settings, researchers are also part of the change rather than mere observers, an additional factor that came up in our participatory results validation activities and that requires further research. For more influence on policies and practice, research for development requires active participation of non-academic actors from the outset, when the project contents are defined.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume129
Pages (from-to)107-115
Number of pages9
ISSN1462-9011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.03.2022

Bibliographical note

This study was funded by the Swiss Program for Research on Global Issues for Development (r4d program) within the synthesis project on “Utilization of research knowledge for sustainability transformations”. The authors thank all participating respondents. We also thank Claudia Rutte and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments, and Tina Hirschbuehl for language editing.

Much progress has been made in conceptualizing transdisciplinarity (TD), providing TD theories and concepts for sustainability transformation and contribution to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the lack of larger data sets undermines empirical verification. This study therefore set out to investigate the experiences of 54 research for development projects from the 10-year Swiss Program for Research on Global Issues for Development (r4d program). The r4d program included five thematic modules (ecosystems, food security, social conflict, employment, public health) and one thematically open module. The projects shared strategic, scientific, and development objectives as set by the funding agencies, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the Swiss National Science Foundation. Projects were asked to use a transdisciplinary approach, which was, however, not further defined. Our overall aim was to analyse the research activities and processes leading to the widespread utilization of co-created knowledge by a broad range of actors. Our guiding hypothesis was that there is a positive relationship between the utilization of research knowledge (and associated changes in science, policy, and practice) and a transdisciplinary project process. Specifically, we aimed to answer the following research questions:

    Research areas

  • Co-creation, Knowledge utilization, Sustainability, Transdisciplinarity, Transformation
  • Transdisciplinary studies

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Carsten Hobohm

Publications

  1. Determinants in the online distribution of digital content
  2. Next level production networks
  3. Object-Oriented Construction Handbook
  4. Fruit Detection and Yield Mass Estimation from a UAV Based RGB Dense Cloud for an Apple Orchard
  5. How can Environmental Management contribute to Shareholder Value?
  6. The role of learning strategies for performance in mathematics courses for engineers
  7. The end of certainties
  8. Changes in processing characteristics and microstructural evolution during friction extrusion of aluminum
  9. An introductional lecture on chaotic systems through Lorenz attractor and forced Lotka Volterra equation for interdisciplinary education
  10. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without Russia
  11. Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes
  12. Timing and fragmentation of daily working hours arrangements and income inequality
  13. Aligning the design of intermediary organisations with the ecosystem
  14. Impacts of Multiple Environmental Change Drivers on Growth of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica)
  15. Towards greener and sustainable ionic liquids using naturally occurring and nature-inspired pyridinium structures
  16. Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass
  17. Umweltrechtsschutz in China
  18. On the combined effect of soil fertility and topography on tree growth in subtropical forest ecosystems - a study from SE China
  19. Liveness Formats
  20. Is there a compensating wage differential for high crime levels?
  21. Gremlin fusion products with immunoglobulin Fc domains and their use as antiinflammatories or immunomodulators
  22. Jurisdiction and applicable law in cases of damage from space in Europe - The advent of the most suitable choice - Rome II
  23. Welcome to the Glitch and Make Some Noise: Understanding Media through Audio Hacking
  24. Team Ambidexterity and its Prerequisites: An Exploratory Study of an IT Service Management Team
  25. Convergence or mediation? Experts of vulnerability and the vulnerability of experts' discourses on nanotechnologies
  26. Can management compensate for atmospheric nutrient deposition in heathland ecosystems?
  27. Group consent in population based research
  28. A flexible semi-empirical model for estimating ammonia volatilization from field-applied slurry
  29. Soil [N] modulates soil C cycling in CO2-fumigated tree stands
  30. Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
  31. Earnings less risk-free interest charge (ERIC) and stock returns: ERIC’s relative and incremental information content in a European sample
  32. Everyone’s Going to be an Architect
  33. Need for cognition, academic self-efficacy and parental education predict the intention to go to college – evidence from a multigroup study
  34. Can not wanting to know be responsible?
  35. ‘Then you just have to perform better’
  36. Understanding market transformation
  37. Computer Support for Environmental Management Accounting
  38. Scale Misfit in Ecosystem Service Governance as a Source of Environmental Conflict
  39. Negative effects of forest gaps on dung removal in a full-factorial experiment
  40. Spatial variation in human disturbances and their effects on forest structure and biodiversity across an Afromontane forest
  41. Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives