Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? / Vogel, Freydis; Kollar, Ingo; Ufer, Stefan et al.
In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2021, p. 512-521.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1496b1f3227c4b7781416e3bbaebade7,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?",
abstract = "Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners{\textquoteright} prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners{\textquoteright} argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.",
keywords = "argumentation, CSCL script, motivation, scaffolding, university students, Educational science",
author = "Freydis Vogel and Ingo Kollar and Stefan Ufer and Anselm Strohmaier and Kristina Reiss and Frank Fischer",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts

T2 - Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

AU - Vogel, Freydis

AU - Kollar, Ingo

AU - Ufer, Stefan

AU - Strohmaier, Anselm

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Fischer, Frank

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

AB - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

KW - argumentation

KW - CSCL script

KW - motivation

KW - scaffolding

KW - university students

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85118933165

VL - 58

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Female Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) and Environmental Decoupling. The moderating impact of Sustainability Board Committees
  2. Income distribution and willingness to pay for ecosystem services
  3. Wirkungen der Beschäftigungspflicht schwerbehinderter Arbeitnehmer
  4. Consistent drivers of plant biodiversity across managed ecosystems
  5. Freie Berufe im Mikrozensus II - Einkommen und Einkommensverteilung
  6. Transfer operator-based extraction of coherent features on surfaces
  7. Offline question answering over linked data using limited resources
  8. Foraging wireworms are attracted to root-produced volatile aldehydes
  9. Machine vision system errors for unmanned aerial vehicle navigation
  10. Employing a Novel Metaheuristic Algorithm to Optimize an LSTM Model
  11. Prospective material flow analysis of the end-of-life decommissioning
  12. Climate change and modelling of extreme temperatures in Switzerland
  13. Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project:
  14. Measurement approaches for inigrated reporting adoption and quality
  15. Detection of oscillations with application in the pantograph control
  16. Intensity of Time and Income Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty:
  17. Abundance of large old trees in wood-pastures of Transylvania (Romania)
  18. Drawing as a Generative Activity and Drawing as a Prognostic Activity
  19. Credit frictions, selection into external finance and gains from trade
  20. Lagrangian analysis of long-term dynamics of turbulent superstructures
  21. The Rise and Fall of Electricity Distribution Cooperatives in Germany
  22. Web-based depression treatment for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients
  23. Assessing Printability Maps in Additive Manufacturing of Metal Alloys