Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? / Vogel, Freydis; Kollar, Ingo; Ufer, Stefan et al.
In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2021, p. 512-521.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1496b1f3227c4b7781416e3bbaebade7,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?",
abstract = "Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners{\textquoteright} prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners{\textquoteright} argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.",
keywords = "argumentation, CSCL script, motivation, scaffolding, university students, Educational science",
author = "Freydis Vogel and Ingo Kollar and Stefan Ufer and Anselm Strohmaier and Kristina Reiss and Frank Fischer",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts

T2 - Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

AU - Vogel, Freydis

AU - Kollar, Ingo

AU - Ufer, Stefan

AU - Strohmaier, Anselm

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Fischer, Frank

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

AB - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

KW - argumentation

KW - CSCL script

KW - motivation

KW - scaffolding

KW - university students

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85118933165

VL - 58

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Applied Econometrics with Stata for PhD Students
  2. Learners managing the ambiguity of sustainable development – An empirical exploration of the learning method "Systemic Visualisation"
  3. Long-term Internships of Physical Education Pre-service Teachers in the Pandemic: A Mixed-methods Anaylsis
  4. Research on Cytotoxics in the Environment.
  5. Hyperkult XIX - 2010
  6. Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung (Externe Organisation)
  7. forum anders reisen e.V. (Externe Organisation)
  8. Digital emigrants: Attitudes, intentions, and experiences of pre-service English foreign language teachers regarding digital game-based language learning
  9. Gamification in ELT: Meeting the needs of all learners
  10. Universität von Virginia
  11. The Convention on Biological Diversity, “Biopiracy”, and Justice. Reconstructing the “biopiracy” debate from the perspective of the concept of justice.
  12. Challenging the functionality of audits: Examining the bureaucratization of risks of industrial accidents through the eyes of Franz Kafka, novelist and auditor
  13. transmediale 2017
  14. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz (Externe Organisation)
  15. Developing pragmatic competence in a study abroad context (International Pragmatics Conference - IPrA 2017: Pragmatics in the real world, Belfast)
  16. Universität Trier
  17. Hamburger Fremdsprachentage
  18. The cross-pressured legislator: Trading off issue dimensions in EU immigration policy
  19. Intensive Quantitative Methods Course for PhD students, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  20. The Sap of Organizational Life
  21. Zur Wirksamkeit formativen Feedbacks in der Ausbildung angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte
  22. Die feinen Unterschiede in den Werken von Bertrand Lavier
  23. After Progress
  24. 2nd EMES PhD Summer School - 2010