Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? / Vogel, Freydis; Kollar, Ingo; Ufer, Stefan et al.
In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2021, p. 512-521.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1496b1f3227c4b7781416e3bbaebade7,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?",
abstract = "Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners{\textquoteright} prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners{\textquoteright} argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.",
keywords = "argumentation, CSCL script, motivation, scaffolding, university students, Educational science",
author = "Freydis Vogel and Ingo Kollar and Stefan Ufer and Anselm Strohmaier and Kristina Reiss and Frank Fischer",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts

T2 - Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

AU - Vogel, Freydis

AU - Kollar, Ingo

AU - Ufer, Stefan

AU - Strohmaier, Anselm

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Fischer, Frank

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

AB - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

KW - argumentation

KW - CSCL script

KW - motivation

KW - scaffolding

KW - university students

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85118933165

VL - 58

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Workshop "Marked-based Instruments (MBI) for Ecosystem Services and Nature Protection" - 2011
  2. The Documentary Method - an Introduction
  3. "Information-Oriented Communicative Acting in the Internet: Communication Modes between Mass- and Interpersonal Communication"
  4. Development and validation of a video-based instrument for the assessment of feedback competence.
  5. Auto-assistive bodily practices. A history of early haptic technologies and practices
  6. Validation of School Inspection Frameworks and Methods
  7. Networkers, Grazers, and Explorers: how sustainability-oriented innovation in SMEs unfolds through a regional network setting.
  8. 'Re': Zu Ästhetiken der Wiederholung 2011
  9. Research Workshop “Innovation & Value Creation"
  10. Socio-technical Instruments for Integrated River Basin Management
  11. 4th International Conference on Indicators and Concepts of Innovation - 2010
  12. Workshop "Marked-based Instruments (MBI) for Ecosystem Services and Nature Protection" - 2011
  13. Conference on Recent Developments in Econometrics - 2006
  14. Agrobiodiversity between Protection and Use – the Example of Rural Development in Germany
  15. Expertenworkshop - 2006
  16. 5. Forschungsseminar „Innovation and Value Creation“ 2010
  17. HyperKult 20 - Trivialisierung 2011
  18. Benefits of the Bottom Line and Beyond: Corporate Volunteering in Germany
  19. Tagebuchstudien ...in Aktion
  20. (University) support programmes and sustainable regional development: Why, how, and with what impact?
  21. WIE KOOPERATIV SIND WIR EIGENTLICH?
  22. Cranfield University
  23. Connecting feedback to self-efficacy: Differences between pre-service and expert teachers’ feedback quality
  24. BioDiva Start-up Workshop 2010
  25. Greener Management International (Zeitschrift)
  26. New Work - Corporate Digital Responsibility: Digitalization for a sustainable future
  27. College (Organisation)
  28. Fakultät W allgemein (Organisation)
  29. Förderprogramm „Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung im Mittelstand“
  30. Siebert Verlag (Verlag)
  31. Co-constructing worth in precarious work: The case of the Influencer Pay Gap Community
  32. Guidelines for Assessing Biodiversity-Related Risks and Opportunities in the Financial Sector: An Aid for Implementing the VfU Biodiversity Principles
  33. European Academy of Management - EURAM 2009
  34. Regional monitoring and modeling of the effects of vegetation restoration on soil erosion’
  35. Tertium Comparationis (Zeitschrift)
  36. 6. Forschungsseminar „Innovation and Value Creation“ 2011
  37. Pitfalls and potential of institutional change: Rain-index insurance and the sustainability of rangeland management
  38. International Journal of Business Environment (Zeitschrift)