Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? / Vogel, Freydis; Kollar, Ingo; Ufer, Stefan et al.
In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2021, p. 512-521.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1496b1f3227c4b7781416e3bbaebade7,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?",
abstract = "Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners{\textquoteright} prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners{\textquoteright} argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.",
keywords = "argumentation, CSCL script, motivation, scaffolding, university students, Educational science",
author = "Freydis Vogel and Ingo Kollar and Stefan Ufer and Anselm Strohmaier and Kristina Reiss and Frank Fischer",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts

T2 - Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

AU - Vogel, Freydis

AU - Kollar, Ingo

AU - Ufer, Stefan

AU - Strohmaier, Anselm

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Fischer, Frank

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

AB - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

KW - argumentation

KW - CSCL script

KW - motivation

KW - scaffolding

KW - university students

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85118933165

VL - 58

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Visualization of the Plasma Frequency by means of a Particle Simulation using a Normalized Periodic Model
  2. Simple saturated relay non-linear PD control for uncertain motion systems with friction and actuator constraint
  3. On the origin of passive rotation in rotational joints, and how to calculate it
  4. Taking the pulse of Earth's tropical forests using networks of highly distributed plots
  5. There is no Software, there are just Services: Introduction
  6. Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development
  7. E-stability and stability of adaptive learning in models with asymmetric information
  8. Need Satisfaction and Optimal Functioning at Leisure and Work: A Longitudinal Validation Study of the DRAMMA Model
  9. Comparison of Odor Thresholds obtained by a Three Alternative Choice Procedure and by the Method of Limits
  10. Scholarly Question Answering Using Large Language Models in the NFDI4DataScience Gateway
  11. A Wavelet Packet Algorithm for Online Detection of Pantograph Vibrations
  12. Web-scale extension of RDF knowledge bases from templated websites
  13. Sensitivity to complexity - an important prerequisite of problem solving mathematics teaching
  14. Advantages and disadvantages of different text coding procedures for research and practice in a school context
  15. Interpreting Strings, Weaving Threads
  16. Applications of the Simultaneous Modular Approach in the Field of Material Flow Analysis
  17. Foundations and applications of computer based material flow networks for einvironmental management
  18. On the Decoupling and Output Functional Controllability of Robotic Manipulation
  19. Computer als Medium
  20. Stability analysis of a linear model predictive control and its application in a water recovery process
  21. Using Fuzzy PD Controllers for Soft Motions in a Car-like Robot
  22. Exploring the limits of graph invariant- and spectrum-based discrimination of (sub)structures.
  23. A framework for business model development in technology-driven start-ups
  24. An evaluation of BPR methodologies adopting NIMSAD: A systematic framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies
  25. Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations
  26. Robust feedback linearization using an adaptive PD regulator for a sensorless control of a throttle valve
  27. Spaces for challenging experiences, indeterminacy, and experimentation
  28. For a return to the forgotten formula: 'Data 1 + Data 2 > Data 1'
  29. Commitment to grand challenges in fluid forms of organizing
  30. Cognitive Predictors of Child Second Language Comprehension and Syntactic Learning
  31. Using augmented video to test in-car user experiences of context analog HUDs
  32. Modeling Conditional Dependencies in Multiagent Trajectories