1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? / Vogel, Freydis; Kollar, Ingo; Ufer, Stefan et al.
in: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Jahrgang 58, Nr. 5, 2021, S. 512-521.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Vogel, F, Kollar, I, Ufer, S, Strohmaier, A, Reiss, K & Fischer, F 2021, 'Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?', Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Jg. 58, Nr. 5, S. 512-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

APA

Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Strohmaier, A., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2021). Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

Vancouver

Vogel F, Kollar I, Ufer S, Strohmaier A, Reiss K, Fischer F. Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen? Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2021;58(5):512-521. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

Bibtex

@article{1496b1f3227c4b7781416e3bbaebade7,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts: Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?",
abstract = "Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners{\textquoteright} prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners{\textquoteright} argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.",
keywords = "argumentation, CSCL script, motivation, scaffolding, university students, Educational science",
author = "Freydis Vogel and Ingo Kollar and Stefan Ufer and Anselm Strohmaier and Kristina Reiss and Frank Fischer",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "512--521",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation in mathematics with CSCL scripts

T2 - Which is the optimal scripting level for university freshmen?

AU - Vogel, Freydis

AU - Kollar, Ingo

AU - Ufer, Stefan

AU - Strohmaier, Anselm

AU - Reiss, Kristina

AU - Fischer, Frank

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

AB - Argumentative scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning are scaffolds that prompt learners to take over distributed roles and to move through a sequence of activities that specify an argumentative learning discourse. Argumentative scripts may lead to suboptimal effects on learning outcomes when their level of scaffolding does not fit learners’ prerequisites regarding argumentation. This study compares the effects of three different levels of argumentative scripts on learners’ argumentation knowledge and learning motivation. Results show that university freshmen in the context of mathematics seem to learn best when the argumentative script targets a medium level, scaffolding the sequence of social discourse, but not necessarily the construction of single arguments. Non-significant results regarding the effects on motivational variables speak against the concern that a too detailed structure of scripts may be detrimental for learning due to reduced learning motivation.

KW - argumentation

KW - CSCL script

KW - motivation

KW - scaffolding

KW - university students

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2021.1961098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85118933165

VL - 58

SP - 512

EP - 521

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

On the role of linguistic features for comprehension and learning from STEM texts. A meta-analysis

Strohmaier, A. R., Ehmke, T., Härtig, H. & Leiss, D., 01.05.2023, in: Educational Research Review. 39, 100533.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

Which Potential Linguistic Challenges do Pre-Service Teachers Identify in a Mathematical Expository Text?

Strohmaier, A. R., Albrecht, I., Schmitz, A., Kuhl, P. & Leiss, D., 10.2023, in: Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik. 44, 2, S. 295-324 30 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Collaborative epistemic writing and writing-to-learn in mathematics: can it foster mathematical argumentation competence?

Strohmaier, A. R., Vogel, F. & Reiss, K. M., 12.05.2018, in: RISTAL. 1, S. 133-147 15 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Considering Teachers’ Beliefs, Motivation, and Emotions Regarding Teaching Mathematics With Digital Tools: The Effect of an In-Service Teacher Training

Reinhold, F., Strohmaier, A., Finger-Collazos, Z. & Reiss, K., 06.10.2021, in: Frontiers in Education. 6, 12 S., 723869.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Different complex word problems require different combinations of cognitive skills

Strohmaier, A. R., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S., Berkowitz, M., Vogel-Heuser, B. & Reiss, K., 01.01.2022, in: Educational Studies in Mathematics. 109, 1, S. 89-114 26 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Transformations 2017
  2. Learning through play? Evaluating digital games for language learning
  3. Transcribing Nonverbal Elements in the Classroom
  4. Conference on Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology - PATH 2006
  5. Everything flows – identification and characterization of coherent patterns
  6. Denoising and Harmonic Detection Using Libraries of Nonorthogonal Trigonometric Bases
  7. Language Teaching (Zeitschrift)
  8. International Conference on Mathematical Models & Computational Techniques in Science & Engineering - MMCTSE2020 
  9. The semantics of transformation: conceptual work based on Freirean methodology.
  10. 11th Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering - CIRP ICME 2017
  11. The Water Framework Directive: Policy Implementation Through Multi-Level Governance
  12. 2021 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing and its Engineering Applications
  13. Blogs in the Foreign Language Classroom
  14. While the Angels are Naming Us.
  15. Employer Longevity Readiness Index Workshop: Session 2: How do you build a longevity readiness Index?
  16. Navigating in the Digital Jungle: Articulating Combinatory Affordances of Digital Infrastructures for Collaboration
  17. The Cybernetic Hypothesis

Publikationen

  1. Are all errors created equal?
  2. A survey of empirical studies using transaction level data on exports and imports
  3. Modeling of Logistic Processes in Assembly Areas
  4. An Adaptive and Optimized Switching Observer for Sensorless Control of an Electromagnetic Valve Actuator in Camless Internal Combustion Engines
  5. An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation
  6. Internet and computer based interventions for cannabis use
  7. Obstacle Coordinates Transformation from TVS Body-Frame to AGV Navigation-Frame
  8. Learning to rule
  9. PID Controller Application in a Gimbal Construction for Camera Stabilization and Tracking
  10. Metaphors and Paradigms of the Language Animal—or—The Advantage of seeing “Time Is a Resource” as a Paradigm
  11. Errors in Working with Office Computers
  12. Top-down contingent feature-specific orienting with and without awareness of the visual input
  13. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach?
  14. Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices
  15. Learning from partially annotated sequences
  16. Active learning for network intrusion detection
  17. Complexity of traffic scenes and EEG-measures of processing workload in car driving
  18. Mirrored piezo servo hydraulic actuators for use in camless combustion engines and its Control with mirrored inputs and MPC
  19. Simple saturated PID control for fast transient of motion systems
  20. A Lyapunov based PI controller with an anti-windup scheme for a purification process of potable water
  21. Embarrassment as a public vs. private emotion and symbolic coping behaviour
  22. The Creation of the Concept through the Interaction of Philosophy with Science and Art
  23. From "cracking the orthographic code" to "playing with language"
  24. Strategies of postural control in static and in dynamic testing situations
  25. Cost effectiveness of guided Internet-based interventions for depression in comparison with control conditions
  26. Design of an Information-Based Distributed Production Planning System
  27. Operations Systems of Container Terminals
  28. Sensor concept for solving the direct kinematics problem of the Stewart-Gough platform
  29. Topic selection and development in learner-native speaker voice-based telecollaborative discourse
  30. Adaptive control of the nonlinear dynamic behavior of the cantilever-sample system of an atomic force microscope
  31. Explaining and controlling for the psychometric properties of computer-generated figural matrix items