Different complex word problems require different combinations of cognitive skills

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Mathematical word problem solving is influenced by various characteristics of the task and the person solving it. Yet, previous research has rarely related these characteristics to holistically answer which word problem requires which set of individual cognitive skills. In the present study, we conducted a secondary data analysis on a dataset of N = 1282 undergraduate students solving six mathematical word problems from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Previous results had indicated substantial variability in the contribution of individual cognitive skills to the correct solution of the different tasks. Here, we exploratively reanalyzed the data to investigate which task characteristics may account for this variability, considering verbal, arithmetic, spatial, and general reasoning skills simultaneously. Results indicate that verbal skills were the most consistent predictor of successful word problem solving in these tasks, arithmetic skills only predicted the correct solution of word problems containing calculations, spatial skills predicted solution rates in the presence of a visual representation, and general reasoning skills were more relevant in simpler problems that could be easily solved using heuristics. We discuss possible implications, emphasizing how word problems may differ with regard to the cognitive skills required to solve them correctly.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEducational Studies in Mathematics
Volume109
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)89-114
Number of pages26
ISSN0013-1954
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2022

Bibliographical note

Funding: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg

    Research areas

  • Arithmetic skills, General reasoning skills, Spatial skills, Verbal skills, Word problems
  • Educational science

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods
  2. DialogueMaps: Supporting interactive transdisciplinary dialogues with a web-based tool for multi-layer knowledge maps
  3. On the Power and Performance of a Doubly Latent Residual Approach to Explain Latent Specific Factors in Multilevel-Bifactor-(S-1) Models
  4. Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the ‘Weather Station Model’ of visual backward masking
  5. Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations
  6. A Multimethod Latent State-Trait Model for Structurally Different and Interchangeable Methods
  7. Restoring Causal Analysis to Structural Equation ModelingReview of Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd Edition), by Judea Pearl
  8. Dynamic priority based dispatching of AGVs in flexible job shops
  9. An empirically grounded ontology for analyzing IT-based interventions in business ecosystems
  10. From Enterprise Architecture to Business Ecosystem Architecture
  11. Integrating business models and enterprise architecture
  12. How to assess transformative performance towards sustainable development in higher education institutions
  13. The feasibility of using Apple's ResearchKit for recruitment and data collection
  14. Composing with the terra fluida of interaction: new paths for CCO research as relational practice
  15. Local responses to global technological change.
  16. Determinants and Development of Schools in Organization Theory
  17. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services

Press / Media

  1. Rio+20