Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility. / Trittin-Ulbrich, Hannah; Böckel, Alexa.
In: Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, 3, 01.09.2022, p. 447-459.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4682fb60b9f4d2f880cb04bca0a6905,
title = "Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility",
abstract = "How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.",
keywords = "corporate digital responsibility (CDR), digital innovation, institutional entrepreneurship, legitimacy, responsible digital innovation, Management studies",
author = "Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich and Alexa B{\"o}ckel",
note = "We thank the Robert Bosch Stiftung for the generous funding of the workshop series “Digitalization and Sustainability: A European Perspective,” which helped with the data collection process. Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich further acknowledges the financial support of the Dr. Theo and Friedl Sch{\"o}ller Research Center for Business and Society. We further thank Nicolas Markert for his support in preparing the data for analysis. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Creativity and Innovation Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/caim.12513",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "447--459",
journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation

T2 - The case of corporate digital responsibility

AU - Trittin-Ulbrich, Hannah

AU - Böckel, Alexa

N1 - We thank the Robert Bosch Stiftung for the generous funding of the workshop series “Digitalization and Sustainability: A European Perspective,” which helped with the data collection process. Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich further acknowledges the financial support of the Dr. Theo and Friedl Schöller Research Center for Business and Society. We further thank Nicolas Markert for his support in preparing the data for analysis. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Creativity and Innovation Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022/9/1

Y1 - 2022/9/1

N2 - How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.

AB - How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.

KW - corporate digital responsibility (CDR)

KW - digital innovation

KW - institutional entrepreneurship

KW - legitimacy

KW - responsible digital innovation

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132591528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3aee1a6d-1bd0-3880-a253-017edeed1aa9/

U2 - 10.1111/caim.12513

DO - 10.1111/caim.12513

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132591528

VL - 31

SP - 447

EP - 459

JO - Creativity and Innovation Management

JF - Creativity and Innovation Management

SN - 0963-1690

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Das entgegengesetzte Denken. Metaphysische Marginalien zu Lévinas
  2. Practical problems associated with refugee protection in western Tanzania
  3. Applicability of adapted reservoir operation for water stress mitigation under dry year conditions
  4. Consumer Preferences and Their Willingness to Pay for Local Products (by Means of Consumer Ethnocentrism)
  5. Biodegradation tests of mercaptocarboxylic acids, their esters, related divalent sulfur compounds and mercaptans
  6. Gesprächsformen
  7. Berechnung und Weiterentwicklung des Sozialindex für Hamburger Schulen
  8. BAuA-Arbeitszeitbefragung
  9. Composite hot extrusion of functional elements
  10. Wer fraß die Geburtstagstorte?
  11. Pentecostal voices and discourse perspectives to LGBTQ+ narratives in Nigeria
  12. Laypeople’s Affective Images of Energy Transition Pathways
  13. Open participation network and school health programs - Review of the BLK experiment OPUS (1997-2000) for health promotion
  14. Games People (Don’t) Play
  15. Gase auf submikroskopischer Ebene untersuchen
  16. Key competencies for sustainable consumption
  17. The Interplay Between Supply Chain Transparency and NGO Pressure
  18. RoMe
  19. Environmental impacts of droughts: key challenges.
  20. Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC
  21. Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach' mich nicht nass!
  22. Reisen als Möglichkeit eines Anderssein-Könnens
  23. A note on firm age and the margins of imports: first evidence from Germany
  24. The defence of necessity
  25. Es wird teuer
  26. AIDA, reif für das Museum?
  27. Was kommt nach der Selbstevaluation?
  28. To the computation of the torsion shear stresses and warping shear coefficients at straight thin-walled bars
  29. Night-time noise annoyance
  30. Analysis of estrogenic activity in coastal surface waters of the Baltic Sea using the yeast estrogen screen
  31. Production of Mg-Mg2Si Composites