Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility. / Trittin-Ulbrich, Hannah; Böckel, Alexa.
in: Creativity and Innovation Management, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 3, 3, 01.09.2022, S. 447-459.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4682fb60b9f4d2f880cb04bca0a6905,
title = "Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation: The case of corporate digital responsibility",
abstract = "How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.",
keywords = "corporate digital responsibility (CDR), digital innovation, institutional entrepreneurship, legitimacy, responsible digital innovation, Management studies",
author = "Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich and Alexa B{\"o}ckel",
note = "We thank the Robert Bosch Stiftung for the generous funding of the workshop series “Digitalization and Sustainability: A European Perspective,” which helped with the data collection process. Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich further acknowledges the financial support of the Dr. Theo and Friedl Sch{\"o}ller Research Center for Business and Society. We further thank Nicolas Markert for his support in preparing the data for analysis. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Creativity and Innovation Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/caim.12513",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "447--459",
journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation

T2 - The case of corporate digital responsibility

AU - Trittin-Ulbrich, Hannah

AU - Böckel, Alexa

N1 - We thank the Robert Bosch Stiftung for the generous funding of the workshop series “Digitalization and Sustainability: A European Perspective,” which helped with the data collection process. Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich further acknowledges the financial support of the Dr. Theo and Friedl Schöller Research Center for Business and Society. We further thank Nicolas Markert for his support in preparing the data for analysis. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Creativity and Innovation Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022/9/1

Y1 - 2022/9/1

N2 - How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.

AB - How does responsible digital innovation become an accepted and desired innovation practice for businesses? Drawing on the case of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR), we study how institutional entrepreneurs across different fields construct CDR as an issue to legitimize corporate commitment to responsible digital innovation. Our qualitative study from Germany suggests that institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation entails the discursive, relational and material legitimation of responsible digital innovation through the issue of CDR. The findings of this study enrich institutional research on digital innovation by shedding light on the field-level construction of responsible digital innovation through Corporate Digital Responsibility. We further extend existing CDR frameworks by detailing the multi-stakeholder efforts that may shape a firm's approach to CDR, as well as by revealing additional topics associated with the issue. We highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our research.

KW - corporate digital responsibility (CDR)

KW - digital innovation

KW - institutional entrepreneurship

KW - legitimacy

KW - responsible digital innovation

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132591528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3aee1a6d-1bd0-3880-a253-017edeed1aa9/

U2 - 10.1111/caim.12513

DO - 10.1111/caim.12513

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132591528

VL - 31

SP - 447

EP - 459

JO - Creativity and Innovation Management

JF - Creativity and Innovation Management

SN - 0963-1690

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The Conjoined Twin Sisters Helen and Judith (1701-1723) and Their Pictorial Impact in Later 18th-Century Science
  2. Merkmale des SEMIK-Schwerpunkts "Entwicklung von Unterrichtskonzepten"
  3. Staying with the Secret
  4. The buzz before business
  5. Übermittlung, Passage, Kanal, Medium
  6. Land-sharing/-sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
  7. Die Drittintervention in Beschwerdeverfahren vor dem EGMR
  8. Die Ökologisierung des Denkens
  9. Ressourcensicherung durch Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement
  10. External Influences on Regionalism
  11. The Pervasive Role of Pragmatics in Early Language
  12. Residual stresses near the hot sprues of as-cast Mg-Zn alloys investigated by STRESS-SPEC neutron diffractometer
  13. UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing
  14. Moral Sensitivity as a Precondition of Moral Distress
  15. Einleitung
  16. Situationen der Gruppenvergewaltigung
  17. Lernbegleitung im inklusiven Mathematikunterricht
  18. Ivano Alogna, Christine Bakker, Jean-Pierre Gauci (eds). Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2021. Pp. 543. ISBN: 9789004447608.
  19. Die totale Produktion
  20. Corporate Biodiversity Management Handbook
  21. Teacher Education for Sustainable Development
  22. Randlos in der Mehrheitskultur
  23. "Entäussertes Vermögen"
  24. Gesellschaftsrecht
  25. Denmark: “De Grønne”
  26. Task choice shields against incidental affective influences on effort-related cardiovascular response
  27. Transcultural Science from the Perspective of international Organisations
  28. Digitale Medien, Partizipation und Ungleichheit
  29. Legal and Regulatory Content for Small Satellites
  30. Entwicklung und Zukunft der Sexualität und Liebe