A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. / Koch, Tobias; Schultze, Martin; Burrus, Jeremy et al.
In: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 40, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 477-510.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koch T, Schultze M, Burrus J, Roberts RD, Eid M. A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2015 Oct 1;40(5):477-510. doi: 10.3102/1076998615606109

Bibtex

@article{d4003f9d59d547a6bfbde3d08c166da6,
title = "A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods",
abstract = "The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.",
keywords = "Sociology, MTMM analysis, multilevel structural equation modeling, structurally different and interchangeable methods",
author = "Tobias Koch and Martin Schultze and Jeremy Burrus and Roberts, {Richard D.} and Michael Eid",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3102/1076998615606109",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "477--510",
journal = "Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics",
issn = "1076-9986",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

AU - Koch, Tobias

AU - Schultze, Martin

AU - Burrus, Jeremy

AU - Roberts, Richard D.

AU - Eid, Michael

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

AB - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

KW - Sociology

KW - MTMM analysis

KW - multilevel structural equation modeling

KW - structurally different and interchangeable methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945303884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/1076998615606109

DO - 10.3102/1076998615606109

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84945303884

VL - 40

SP - 477

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

JF - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

SN - 1076-9986

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Plenary lecture eintitled: "Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Maglev Systems based on Kalman Filtering"
  2. Local Interest Representation in Multi-Level Parties
  3. Do mathematics teachers promote the use of multiple representations in learning support situations? - Results from a video analysis.
  4. UV photodegradation of trimipramine under different environmental variables and chemical nature of aqueous solution - biodegradation and LC-MSn characterization of the formed transformation products
  5. Differentiating forest types using Terrasar-X spotlight images based on factor analysis
  6. Breaks and age related strain in continuous physical work
  7. Networkers, Grazers, and Explorers: how sustainability-oriented innovation in SMEs unfolds through a regional network setting.
  8. Who is involved? : Integrating Corporate Functions into Sustainability Management
  9. European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference - EISIC 2013
  10. Objectivity in Political Science
  11. Adaptive teacher speech: An investigation of student directed speech from primary to secondary school
  12. Probleme mit zukünftigen Generationen
  13. Göttingen Centre for Gender Studies (GCG) Summer Symposium Reconsidering gender-based violence in the context of displacement and migration
  14. Universität Middlesex
  15. Declining Trust in Institutions: Why We Should Not Worry
  16. College (Organisation)
  17. Budapest CEU Conference on Cognitive Development
  18. Carl Einstein Re-Visited.
  19. Personal Initiative Training
  20. Offshore Terminals
  21. Summer School, Curating Art and Nature, The Knowledge of the Curator III – Department of History of Art, Architecture, and Landscape, University of Groningen
  22. Comparative Class Actions / Global Litigation Conference - 2019
  23. Designmethoden in transdisziplinären Teams
  24. Grundschule Mathematik (Fachzeitschrift)
  25. Grammatikunterricht unter Berücksichtigung aller Schulstufen
  26. Jenseits der Beschleunigung - 2009
  27. Why Do School Teachers Engage with Sustainable Consumption? Exploring the Role of Personal, Group and Organizational Influence Factors
  28. Tausend Ökologien
  29. University-industry collaboration to stimulate learning in the context of sustainability-oriented innovations
  30. New-Delhi Institute of Management
  31. Plant functional group order of arrival and sown diversity are strong drivers of plant community assembly and ecosystem functioning in dry acidic grasslands
  32. The Dark Side of Mindfulness - Why Mindfulness Interventions Are Not Benefical for Everyone
  33. College (Organisation)
  34. College (Organisation)