A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. / Koch, Tobias; Schultze, Martin; Burrus, Jeremy et al.

In: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 40, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 477-510.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koch T, Schultze M, Burrus J, Roberts RD, Eid M. A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2015 Oct 1;40(5):477-510. doi: 10.3102/1076998615606109

Bibtex

@article{d4003f9d59d547a6bfbde3d08c166da6,
title = "A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods",
abstract = "The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.",
keywords = "Sociology, MTMM analysis, multilevel structural equation modeling, structurally different and interchangeable methods",
author = "Tobias Koch and Martin Schultze and Jeremy Burrus and Roberts, {Richard D.} and Michael Eid",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3102/1076998615606109",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "477--510",
journal = "Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics",
issn = "1076-9986",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

AU - Koch, Tobias

AU - Schultze, Martin

AU - Burrus, Jeremy

AU - Roberts, Richard D.

AU - Eid, Michael

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

AB - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

KW - Sociology

KW - MTMM analysis

KW - multilevel structural equation modeling

KW - structurally different and interchangeable methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945303884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/1076998615606109

DO - 10.3102/1076998615606109

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84945303884

VL - 40

SP - 477

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

JF - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

SN - 1076-9986

IS - 5

ER -

DOI