A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. / Koch, Tobias; Schultze, Martin; Burrus, Jeremy et al.
in: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Jahrgang 40, Nr. 5, 01.10.2015, S. 477-510.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koch T, Schultze M, Burrus J, Roberts RD, Eid M. A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2015 Okt 1;40(5):477-510. doi: 10.3102/1076998615606109

Bibtex

@article{d4003f9d59d547a6bfbde3d08c166da6,
title = "A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods",
abstract = "The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.",
keywords = "Sociology, MTMM analysis, multilevel structural equation modeling, structurally different and interchangeable methods",
author = "Tobias Koch and Martin Schultze and Jeremy Burrus and Roberts, {Richard D.} and Michael Eid",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3102/1076998615606109",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "477--510",
journal = "Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics",
issn = "1076-9986",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multilevel CFA-MTMM Model for Nested Structurally Different Methods

AU - Koch, Tobias

AU - Schultze, Martin

AU - Burrus, Jeremy

AU - Roberts, Richard D.

AU - Eid, Michael

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

AB - The numerous advantages of structural equation modeling (SEM) for the analysis of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) data are well known. MTMM-SEMs allow researchers to explicitly model the measurement error, to examine the true convergent and discriminant validity of the given measures, and to relate external variables to the latent trait as well as the latent method factors in the model. According to Eid et al. (2008) different MTMM measurement designs require different types of MTMM-SEMs. Eid et al. (2008) proposed three different MTMM-SEMs for measurement designs with (a) structurally different methods, (b) interchangeable methods, and (c) a combination of both types of methods. In the present work, we extend this taxonomy to a multilevel correlated traits–correlated methods minus one [CTC(M−1)] model for nested structurally different methods. The new model enables researchers to study method effects on both measurement levels (i.e., within and between clusters, classes, schools, etc.) and evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures. The statistical performance of the model is examined by a simulation study, and recommendations for the application of the model are given.

KW - Sociology

KW - MTMM analysis

KW - multilevel structural equation modeling

KW - structurally different and interchangeable methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945303884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/1076998615606109

DO - 10.3102/1076998615606109

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84945303884

VL - 40

SP - 477

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

JF - Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

SN - 1076-9986

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Using a Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Approach in HESD Research: Reflections on Pitfalls and Added Value
  2. The Relation of Children's Performances in Spatial Tasks at Two Different Scales of Space
  3. Denoising and Harmonic Detection Using Libraries of Nonorthogonal Trigonometric Bases
  4. Do mathematics teachers promote the use of multiple representations in learning support situations? - Results from a video analysis.
  5. On Borders, Boundaries, Clouds, and Globalization. And on China.
  6. Where To Start? Exploring 1-Year-Students’ Preconceptions of Sustainable Development
  7. UV photodegradation of trimipramine under different environmental variables and chemical nature of aqueous solution - biodegradation and LC-MSn characterization of the formed transformation products
  8. Challenges for the Positioning of Destinations: Destination Formation Processes and Territorial Boundaries
  9. Universität Middlesex
  10. Prototyping in der transdisziplinären Teamarbeit
  11. Group Decision and Negotiation (Fachzeitschrift)
  12. Co-creating transformative processes - a designerly approach
  13. Karls-Universität
  14. 37th EGOS Colloquium - EGOS 2021
  15. Designmethoden in transdisziplinären Teams
  16. The Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) (Externe Organisation)
  17. Workshop Open Educational Ressourcen für das Sprachenlernen
  18. A Guided Self-help Intervention for College Women with Eating Disorders: Long-term Results from a Large Randomized Controlled Trial
  19. 7th Space, Creativity, and Organization Workshop - SCO 2022
  20. International Institute of Space Law (IISL)
  21. Legal Expertise: From Above and From Below
  22. Sind Computer kulturfähig?
  23. The struggle for an international regime on space resources
  24. Pharmaceuticals in the environment.
  25. 37th EGOS Colloquium - EGOS 2021
  26. "How Should (Religious) Emotions be Sociologically Studied?"
  27. Praxis der Grounded Theory
  28. Climate Change and Security in Africa 2009
  29. Commercial Space Activities
  30. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Value-Based Sustainability Management
  31. Impact of gas flow on dielectric barrier discharge for air purification
  32. 4th Athens Biennale 2013
  33. IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts - IEEE Holm 2019
  34. Travel and Collaboration
  35. Riparian Atlantic Forest restoration: water table depth and planting spacing affected the growth of planted trees