Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure. / Schmocker, David; Tanner, Carmen; Katsarov, Johannes et al.
in: Current Psychology, Jahrgang 42, Nr. 12, 04.2023, S. 10277-10291.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Schmocker, D, Tanner, C, Katsarov, J & Christen, M 2023, 'Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure', Current Psychology, Jg. 42, Nr. 12, S. 10277-10291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

APA

Vancouver

Schmocker D, Tanner C, Katsarov J, Christen M. Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure. Current Psychology. 2023 Apr;42(12):10277-10291. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

Bibtex

@article{a69b97adfe604d13946f3a00b7d4381a,
title = "Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure",
abstract = "In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures{\textquoteright} factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument{\textquoteright}s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Ethical sensitivity, Moral awareness, Moral competences, Moral intelligence, Moral sensitivity, Management studies",
author = "David Schmocker and Carmen Tanner and Johannes Katsarov and Markus Christen",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "10277--10291",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral sensitivity in business

T2 - A revised measure

AU - Schmocker, David

AU - Tanner, Carmen

AU - Katsarov, Johannes

AU - Christen, Markus

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures’ factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument’s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.

AB - In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures’ factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument’s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.

KW - Ethical sensitivity

KW - Moral awareness

KW - Moral competences

KW - Moral intelligence

KW - Moral sensitivity

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115373452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/848cb108-8c47-3ab4-920e-022f1b54fbde/

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

DO - 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 37215736

AN - SCOPUS:85115373452

VL - 42

SP - 10277

EP - 10291

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

IS - 12

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Dietmar Meyer

Publikationen

  1. Fünfzig Jahre nach morgenwo werden wir sein?
  2. Erzählen - Argumentieren - Beschreiben
  3. A process-oriented framework of competencies for sustainability entrepreneurship
  4. Nutzung von Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement-Software in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen
  5. Statistik und Wirklichkeit
  6. Stakeholders perceptions of the endangered Egyptian vulture
  7. Vorhersage des Studienabbruchs in naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Studiengängen
  8. Predicting academic success with the big 5 rated from different points of view: Self-rated, other rated and faked
  9. Bridging corporate and academic contributions
  10. Lee Daniels' The Butler
  11. "Das Vaterland über die Partei!"
  12. Bohle, Dorothee, und Béla Greskovits. Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery. Ithaca/London. Cornell University Press 2012
  13. Mobile kommunikation
  14. Kunst-Handel im Medien-Wandel
  15. Was nie geschrieben wurde, lesen. L’antropologia linguistica di Walter Benjamin
  16. The research process of understanding biographical learning processes of sustainability entrepreneurs
  17. Go ahead - I will follow you!
  18. Haftungsrecht im Dritten Millenium
  19. Diskussionsinhalte der 8. Hamburger Revisions-Tagung vom 14. und 15. September 2009
  20. Tapping Environmental Accounting Potentials of Beer Brewing
  21. Regulating Treaty Breaches
  22. Humor und wirksame Führung
  23. The marketing and public affairs of sustainability
  24. Das Nachhaltigkeitskonzept Studierender im Studienverlauf
  25. Depicting Women in Brazilian Social Realism: A Transnational and Computational Analysis
  26. Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B. (eds.): Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.240 pp. E 30.00. ISBN 0-52143115-8.
  27. Applicability of the European Commission's framework on safe and sustainable by design to the pharmaceutical sector
  28. Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code and firm performance
  29. Foundations of Management & Entrepreneurship
  30. Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Blechkörpers aus wenigstens zwei Blechen
  31. Theodor Storms Gedicht „Geh nicht hinein“