Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure. / Schmocker, David; Tanner, Carmen; Katsarov, Johannes et al.
In: Current Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 12, 04.2023, p. 10277-10291.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schmocker, D, Tanner, C, Katsarov, J & Christen, M 2023, 'Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure', Current Psychology, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 10277-10291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

APA

Vancouver

Schmocker D, Tanner C, Katsarov J, Christen M. Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure. Current Psychology. 2023 Apr;42(12):10277-10291. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

Bibtex

@article{a69b97adfe604d13946f3a00b7d4381a,
title = "Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure",
abstract = "In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures{\textquoteright} factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument{\textquoteright}s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Ethical sensitivity, Moral awareness, Moral competences, Moral intelligence, Moral sensitivity, Management studies",
author = "David Schmocker and Carmen Tanner and Johannes Katsarov and Markus Christen",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "10277--10291",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral sensitivity in business

T2 - A revised measure

AU - Schmocker, David

AU - Tanner, Carmen

AU - Katsarov, Johannes

AU - Christen, Markus

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures’ factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument’s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.

AB - In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures’ factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument’s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.

KW - Ethical sensitivity

KW - Moral awareness

KW - Moral competences

KW - Moral intelligence

KW - Moral sensitivity

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115373452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/848cb108-8c47-3ab4-920e-022f1b54fbde/

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

DO - 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 37215736

AN - SCOPUS:85115373452

VL - 42

SP - 10277

EP - 10291

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

IS - 12

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Maritime strategies of rising powers
  2. Management von Wertschöpfungsketten
  3. Lachen können und eine Sache lieben
  4. Kunstpädagogische Zeitgenossenschaft
  5. Jean Blondel: his professional legacy
  6. Irish children's books in translation
  7. "How Bad Was He? Let Me Count the Ways"
  8. Hochleistungsverfahren Gewindebohren
  9. Handbook of Philosophy of Management
  10. Eine Blütenkurve für Flächenkonstanz
  11. Eco-Control para la Gestión Ambiental
  12. Different ways lead to ambidexterity
  13. Designing an AI Governance Framework
  14. Cost of illness for bipolar disorder
  15. Bildungstheorie und digitale Bildung
  16. Bibliografie : 1968 - Danach und davor
  17. Beweglichkeitstraining im Schulsport
  18. Barrel Finishing of Magnesium Alloys
  19. Auf dem Weg zum Nachhaltigkeitsstaat?
  20. Assessment of upstream bioprocessing
  21. §100 Allgemeine Übergangsbestimmungen
  22. When Matter Becomes an Active Agent
  23. Von Privatisierung zu den Allmenden
  24. The Street and Organization Studies
  25. Special Section: Personality at Work
  26. Sozialpsychiatrie und Neurobiologie
  27. Richard K. Nelson’s The Island Within
  28. Quo vadis, EU-Umweltberichterstattung?
  29. Öko-Controlling für das Firmenareal
  30. Not Only the Miserable Receive Help
  31. Modellrisiken und Verhaltensrisiken
  32. Mitarbeitende motivieren & einbinden
  33. Konservative Monatsschrift (1879—1922)
  34. Industrialisierung des Kreditwesens
  35. In the name of God and Christianity
  36. Gründung einer Unternehmensberatung
  37. Gewalt in Geschlechterverhältnissen
  38. From Point of Sale to Point of Need
  39. Dokumentation in Kindertagesstätten
  40. Deutschunterricht auf dem Prüfstand
  41. David und Goliath? ‚Ganz indiskutabel‘!
  42. "Das ist einfach nur unprofessionell"
  43. Cultural Practices, Norms, and Values
  44. Buch 6. Musterfeststellungsverfahren
  45. Betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre
  46. Empirische Arbeit: Belastungserleben im Praxissemester
  47. Ausgefüllt, ausgewertet und abgelegt?
  48. Aufbau von Arbeitgeberattraktivität