Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue. / Isenmann, Ralf; Kim, Kicheol.
Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Hrsg. / Stefan Schaltegger; Martin Bennett; Roger Burritt. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland, 2006. S. 533-555.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Isenmann, R & Kim, K 2006, Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue. in S Schaltegger, M Bennett & R Burritt (Hrsg.), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland, Dordrecht, S. 533-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24

APA

Isenmann, R., & Kim, K. (2006). Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Hrsg.), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting (S. 533-555). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24

Vancouver

Isenmann R, Kim K. Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue. in Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt R, Hrsg., Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland. 2006. S. 533-555 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24

Bibtex

@inbook{c10cf5d62dab4d2dbebe0b789c63bc70,
title = "Interactive Sustainability Reporting: Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue",
abstract = "Providing greater interactivity is a step forward in sustainability reporting. Interactivity includes mechanisms to involve key target groups and give feedback, facilities for user control, and opportunities to select report contents and design. These features determine users' satisfaction, value, and overall attitude towards sustainability reporting, whether users actually pay attention to sustainability reports, how readers assess reliability and value of these documents, and the extent to which stakeholders are willing to make use of such communication vehicles for decision making. Today, one-way-communication on sustainability issues through 'one size fits all' hard copies or simple electronic duplicates without any added value, hardly fulfils stakeholder expectations and reporting requirements. In contrast to the importance of these issues of communication in codes of conducts, standards, guidelines, and other recommendations, however, current reporting practice has significant room for improvement. Hence, a framework is proposed and examples of current practice are presented showing how a more interactive sustainability reporting approach could be shaped and implemented.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Nachhaltige Entwicklung , Stakeholder , Unternehmen , Publizit{\"a}t , Corporate Social Responsibility, Target Group, Sustainability Reporting, Triple Bottom Line, Corporate Communication",
author = "Ralf Isenmann and Kicheol Kim",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4020-4079-5",
pages = "533--555",
editor = "Stefan Schaltegger and Martin Bennett and Roger Burritt",
booktitle = "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Interactive Sustainability Reporting

T2 - Developing Clear Target Group Tailoring and Stimulating Stakeholder Dialogue

AU - Isenmann, Ralf

AU - Kim, Kicheol

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Providing greater interactivity is a step forward in sustainability reporting. Interactivity includes mechanisms to involve key target groups and give feedback, facilities for user control, and opportunities to select report contents and design. These features determine users' satisfaction, value, and overall attitude towards sustainability reporting, whether users actually pay attention to sustainability reports, how readers assess reliability and value of these documents, and the extent to which stakeholders are willing to make use of such communication vehicles for decision making. Today, one-way-communication on sustainability issues through 'one size fits all' hard copies or simple electronic duplicates without any added value, hardly fulfils stakeholder expectations and reporting requirements. In contrast to the importance of these issues of communication in codes of conducts, standards, guidelines, and other recommendations, however, current reporting practice has significant room for improvement. Hence, a framework is proposed and examples of current practice are presented showing how a more interactive sustainability reporting approach could be shaped and implemented.

AB - Providing greater interactivity is a step forward in sustainability reporting. Interactivity includes mechanisms to involve key target groups and give feedback, facilities for user control, and opportunities to select report contents and design. These features determine users' satisfaction, value, and overall attitude towards sustainability reporting, whether users actually pay attention to sustainability reports, how readers assess reliability and value of these documents, and the extent to which stakeholders are willing to make use of such communication vehicles for decision making. Today, one-way-communication on sustainability issues through 'one size fits all' hard copies or simple electronic duplicates without any added value, hardly fulfils stakeholder expectations and reporting requirements. In contrast to the importance of these issues of communication in codes of conducts, standards, guidelines, and other recommendations, however, current reporting practice has significant room for improvement. Hence, a framework is proposed and examples of current practice are presented showing how a more interactive sustainability reporting approach could be shaped and implemented.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Nachhaltige Entwicklung

KW - Stakeholder

KW - Unternehmen

KW - Publizität

KW - Corporate Social Responsibility

KW - Target Group

KW - Sustainability Reporting

KW - Triple Bottom Line

KW - Corporate Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892063954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4dedbdf4-e1f3-3b5e-9a95-41e431bcc51b/

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_24

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-4020-4079-5

SN - 1-4020-4079-2

SN - 1-4020-4973-0

SN - 978-1-4020-4973-6

SP - 533

EP - 555

BT - Sustainability Accounting and Reporting

A2 - Schaltegger, Stefan

A2 - Bennett, Martin

A2 - Burritt, Roger

PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Ikonisches Erzählen als Einheit von Realität und Imagination
  2. Reflections on educational leadership for sustainability
  3. Economic Impact Assessment of Climate Change
  4. Entwicklung eines integrativen Logistikmodells für die unternehmensinterne Lieferkette
  5. Nachhaltiger Unterricht und nachhaltige Schulentwicklung durch BBS futur 2.0
  6. „Etwas Begehrenswertes“
  7. Prefiguring Sustainability
  8. Äußere Souveränität
  9. Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Situational-Judgement-Instruments zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen im Bereich des Ressourcenmanagements (ReMI)
  10. Inklusiver Fremdsprachenunterricht (FU)
  11. Dritte Arbeitstagung für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs in der Fremdsprachenforschung
  12. Corpus Linguistics for Sociolinguistics
  13. Corporate biodiversity reporting and earnings management: Does a critical mass of female directors have an impact?
  14. Law and Gospel
  15. Ein unglaubliches Schriftbild, von Rechtschreibung oder Interpunktion ganz zu schweigen
  16. Editorial
  17. Cities are hotspots for threatened species
  18. Kommentierung von Art. 27 AEUV: Ausnahmen
  19. Pentacyclo[5.1.0.0 2, 4.0 3, 5.0 6, 8]octane (Octabisvalene) t
  20. Demagogen von rechts, Provokateure aus der Mitte
  21. Tanz und Technologie
  22. Bank stock performance and bank regulation around the globe
  23. The Ecological Impact of Time
  24. Nachhaltigkeit in der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  25. Risikomanagement bei Startups
  26. Relationships of vocational interest congruence, differentiation, and elevation to career preparedness among university students
  27. Mord in Harpsund
  28. Old wine in new bottles ?
  29. In Krisen aus Krisen lernen
  30. Editorial: Questioning the construction of "balance"