Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. / Hofmann, David A.; Frese, Michael.
Errors in Organizations. Hrsg. / David A. Hofmann; Michael Frese. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011. S. 1-43 (SIOP organizational frontiers series).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Hofmann, DA & Frese, M 2011, Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. in DA Hofmann & M Frese (Hrsg.), Errors in Organizations. SIOP organizational frontiers series, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, S. 1-43. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817827

APA

Hofmann, D. A., & Frese, M. (2011). Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. In D. A. Hofmann, & M. Frese (Hrsg.), Errors in Organizations (S. 1-43). (SIOP organizational frontiers series). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817827

Vancouver

Hofmann DA, Frese M. Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. in Hofmann DA, Frese M, Hrsg., Errors in Organizations. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2011. S. 1-43. (SIOP organizational frontiers series). doi: 10.4324/9780203817827

Bibtex

@inbook{cd080c0cf533431c832b5cbbc34f395d,
title = "Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations",
abstract = "Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion{\textquoteright}s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Pr{\"u}mper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Hofmann, {David A.} and Michael Frese",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
day = "21",
doi = "10.4324/9780203817827",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-8058-6291-1",
series = "SIOP organizational frontiers series",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
pages = "1--43",
editor = "Hofmann, {David A.} and Michael Frese",
booktitle = "Errors in Organizations",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management

T2 - Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations

AU - Hofmann, David A.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 2011/7/21

Y1 - 2011/7/21

N2 - Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion’s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Prümper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).

AB - Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion’s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Prümper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955225795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203817827

DO - 10.4324/9780203817827

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-8058-6291-1

T3 - SIOP organizational frontiers series

SP - 1

EP - 43

BT - Errors in Organizations

A2 - Hofmann, David A.

A2 - Frese, Michael

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - New York

ER -

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Accuracy Improvement of Vision System for Mobile Robot Navigation by Finding the Energetic Center of Laser Signal
  2. Towards combined methods for recording ground beetles
  3. Development and evaluation of a training program for dialysis nurses - An intervention study
  4. Fuzzy based control of a nonholonomic car-like robot for drive assistant systems
  5. Habitual Actions as a Challenge to the Standard Theory of Action
  6. Exchanging Knowledge and Good Practices of Education for Sustainable Development within a Global Student Organization (oikos)
  7. Communicating CCS
  8. Modellieren in der Sekundarstufe
  9. Strategy maps
  10. Modality of task presentation and mathematical abilitiy in a study about spatial ability
  11. Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning
  12. An Indirectly Controlled Full Variable Valve Train System to Improve the Internal Combustion Phase Engines
  13. Soziale Netzwerkanalyse
  14. Effects of accuracy feedback on fractal characteristics of time estimation
  15. Comparative study of microstructure and texture of cast and homogenized TX32 magnesium alloy after hot deformation
  16. A piezo servo hydraulic actuator for use in camless combustion engines and its control with MPC
  17. Effect of grain size and structure, solid solution elements, precipitates and twinning on nanohardness of Mg-Re alloys
  18. How selfish is a thirsty man? A pilot study on comparing sharing behavior with primary and secondary rewards
  19. Time use and time budgets
  20. Short-term effects of a web-based guided self-help intervention for employees with depressive symptoms
  21. Introduction
  22. Towards a dimensional approach to common mental disorders in the ICD-11?
  23. Inter- and intraspecific consumer trait variations determine consumer diversity effects in multispecies predator−prey systems
  24. Understanding and managing post-acquisition integration as change process
  25. Image, Process, Performance, Machine
  26. Searching for New Languages, Searching for Minor Voices in the Archive
  27. Injection of CO2 for the inhibition of scaling in ATES systems
  28. Grüner Umbau
  29. Veto, Right of: Addendum
  30. Buckling Analysis under Uncertainty
  31. Geometric Properties on the Perfect Decoupling Disturbance Control in Manufacturing Systems
  32. Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the IPBES science-policy platform
  33. Playing with Information
  34. Future Challenges of Higher Education in the Context of Sustainable Development from a European Point of View
  35. Change and Continuity in Western Welfare Practices
  36. Vision Statement for the Planet in 2050