Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. / Hofmann, David A.; Frese, Michael.
Errors in Organizations. Hrsg. / David A. Hofmann; Michael Frese. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011. S. 1-43 (SIOP organizational frontiers series).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Hofmann, DA & Frese, M 2011, Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. in DA Hofmann & M Frese (Hrsg.), Errors in Organizations. SIOP organizational frontiers series, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, S. 1-43. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817827

APA

Hofmann, D. A., & Frese, M. (2011). Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. In D. A. Hofmann, & M. Frese (Hrsg.), Errors in Organizations (S. 1-43). (SIOP organizational frontiers series). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817827

Vancouver

Hofmann DA, Frese M. Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. in Hofmann DA, Frese M, Hrsg., Errors in Organizations. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2011. S. 1-43. (SIOP organizational frontiers series). doi: 10.4324/9780203817827

Bibtex

@inbook{cd080c0cf533431c832b5cbbc34f395d,
title = "Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations",
abstract = "Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion{\textquoteright}s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Pr{\"u}mper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Hofmann, {David A.} and Michael Frese",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
day = "21",
doi = "10.4324/9780203817827",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-8058-6291-1",
series = "SIOP organizational frontiers series",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
pages = "1--43",
editor = "Hofmann, {David A.} and Michael Frese",
booktitle = "Errors in Organizations",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management

T2 - Laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations

AU - Hofmann, David A.

AU - Frese, Michael

PY - 2011/7/21

Y1 - 2011/7/21

N2 - Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion’s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Prümper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).

AB - Every organization is confronted with errors; these errors can result in either positive (e.g., learning, innovation) or negative (e.g., loss of time, poor-quality products) consequences. On the positive side, errors can lay the foundation for outcomes such as innovation and learning (e.g., Sitkin, 1992). For example, both Edmondson (1996) and van Dyck, Frese, Baer, and Sonnentag (2005) found that a positive and constructive approach to errors is associated with organizational outcomes such as learning and performance. With regard to the negative aspects of errors, the majority of the attention within the organizational sciences has focused on the investigation of highly salient and visible organizational failures (e.g., Challenger, Columbia, Chernobyl; Perrow, 1984; Reason, 1987; Starbuck & Farjoun, 2005; Starbuck & Milliken, 1988a; Vaughan, 1996). These investigations have taught us a great deal about how many seemingly independent decisions, actions, and organizational conditions can become interconnected and create extreme failure. These extreme examples, however, do not really capture the lion’s share of errors occurring within organizations. Individuals working in organizations make errors every day and every hour and (sometimes) make multiple errors in the span of a minute. Researchers, for example, have estimated that for some computer tasks, up to 50% of work time is spent on error recovery (Hanson, Kraut, & Farber, 1984; Kraut, Hanson, & Farber, 1983; Shneiderman, 1987), and Brodbeck, Zapf, Prümper, and Frese (1993) found that 10% of computer work time is spent handling and recovering from errors. Other computer-based research suggested that individuals average 18 unnecessary cursor movements per hour (Floyd & Pyun, 1987).

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955225795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203817827

DO - 10.4324/9780203817827

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-8058-6291-1

T3 - SIOP organizational frontiers series

SP - 1

EP - 43

BT - Errors in Organizations

A2 - Hofmann, David A.

A2 - Frese, Michael

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - New York

ER -

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
  2. Portuguese part-of-speech tagging with large margin structure learning
  3. AUC Maximizing Support Vector Learning
  4. Analysis of the construction of an autonomous robot to improve its energy efficiency when traveling through irregular terrain
  5. Artificial intelligence in songwriting and composing - perspectives and challenges in creative practices
  6. How to support teachers to give feedback to modelling tasks effectively? Results from a teacher-training-study in the Co²CA project
  7. Sliding Mode Control of an Inductive Power Transmission System with Maximum Efficiency
  8. Robustness of coherent sets computations
  9. Deeper Insights into Different Consumer Perceptions of CSR Communication
  10. Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy
  11. Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research
  12. Joint Proceedings of Scholarly QALD 2023 and SemREC 2023 co-located with 22nd International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2023
  13. Expectations on Hierarchical Scales of Discourse
  14. Effect of yttrium addition on lattice parameter, Young's modulus and vacancy of magnesium
  15. Othering Space
  16. "And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It''
  17. Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best
  18. What´s in a net? or: The end of the average
  19. Introduction to Philosophy of Management
  20. Lessons from modeling 100% renewable scenarios using GENeSYS-MOD
  21. Res Lunae: Characterizing Diverse Lunar Resource Systems Using the Social-Ecological System Framework
  22. Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealised potential for forest multifunctionality.
  23. Continued logarithm representation of real numbers
  24. Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses
  25. Sprachen in Liechtenstein