What role for frames in scalar conflicts?
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 49, 01.12.2015, p. 426-434.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What role for frames in scalar conflicts?
AU - Jürges, Nataly
AU - Newig, Jens
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.
AB - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.
KW - Politics
KW - conflict
KW - framing
KW - multi-level governance
KW - Scale
KW - wind energy
KW - sustainability transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940547339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 49
SP - 426
EP - 434
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
SN - 0264-8377
ER -