What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

What role for frames in scalar conflicts? / Jürges, Nataly; Newig, Jens.
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 49, 01.12.2015, p. 426-434.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jürges N, Newig J. What role for frames in scalar conflicts? Land Use Policy. 2015 Dec 1;49:426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

Bibtex

@article{1ef3c43506c24f52a0c10cf4344e5f55,
title = "What role for frames in scalar conflicts?",
abstract = "To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.",
keywords = "Politics, conflict, framing, multi-level governance, Scale, wind energy, sustainability transition",
author = "Nataly J{\"u}rges and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "426--434",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

AU - Jürges, Nataly

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

AB - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

KW - Politics

KW - conflict

KW - framing

KW - multi-level governance

KW - Scale

KW - wind energy

KW - sustainability transition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940547339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 49

SP - 426

EP - 434

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Wege zur Neuorientierung des Wissensmanagements
  2. Risk management with management control systems
  3. Corrosion behavior of As-Cast binary Mg-Dy alloys
  4. Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies
  5. The Changing Role of Business in Global Society
  6. Personalmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben
  7. 5 Jahre Ombudschaft in der Berliner Jugendhilfe
  8. Wavelet functions for rejecting spurious values
  9. CDS spreads, systemic risk and interconnectedness
  10. Methoden zur Erfolgsmessung im Regionalmarketing
  11. Identity affirmation and social movement support
  12. Technology Development and Stakeholder Influence
  13. Vehicle routing planning with joint distribution
  14. Hannah Arendt und die "Aporien der Menschenrechte"
  15. Die Leistungsfähigkeit der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie
  16. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  17. Aufbau und Organisation von Entwicklungsprojekten
  18. Politikberatung in den USA: Ein Vorbild für Europa?
  19. Billig-standardisiert und hochwertig spezialisiert
  20. Regierungskoalitionen: Bildung und Dauerhaftigkeit
  21. Political Parties, Elections and Ethnicity in Kenya
  22. Dispatching rule selection with Gaussian processes
  23. Die betriebsratsfreie Zone aus ökonomischer Sicht
  24. Extrusion of profiles with variable wall thickness
  25. Stetigkeit nach Handels- und Steuerrecht sowie IFRS
  26. § 4 Grundzüge des materiellen Fusionskontrollrechts
  27. Partizipationsforschung und nachhaltige Entwicklung
  28. Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies:
  29. Weiterentwicklung der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  30. Switching Dispatching Rules with Gaussian Processes
  31. Micro and Macro Perspectives in Organization Theory
  32. Kopplungsprobleme wissensorientierter Kommunikation
  33. Neue Formen der Beschäftigung - neue Personalpolitik?
  34. Microstructural approaches of engineering materials
  35. Basic investigations in incremental profile forming
  36. Parallelgesellschaften? Politische Eliten und Bürger.
  37. Authenticity and authentication in language learning
  38. Outsider- und Insider-Systeme der Corporate Governance
  39. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen einer "deutschen" Limited
  40. Lokale politische Eliten und Fragen der Legitimation
  41. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy
  42. §53 VwVfG Hemmung der Verjährung durch Verwaltungsakt