What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

What role for frames in scalar conflicts? / Jürges, Nataly; Newig, Jens.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 49, 01.12.2015, S. 426-434.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jürges N, Newig J. What role for frames in scalar conflicts? Land Use Policy. 2015 Dez 1;49:426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

Bibtex

@article{1ef3c43506c24f52a0c10cf4344e5f55,
title = "What role for frames in scalar conflicts?",
abstract = "To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.",
keywords = "Politics, conflict, framing, multi-level governance, Scale, wind energy, sustainability transition",
author = "Nataly J{\"u}rges and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "426--434",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

AU - Jürges, Nataly

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

AB - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

KW - Politics

KW - conflict

KW - framing

KW - multi-level governance

KW - Scale

KW - wind energy

KW - sustainability transition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940547339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 49

SP - 426

EP - 434

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI