What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

What role for frames in scalar conflicts? / Jürges, Nataly; Newig, Jens.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 49, 01.12.2015, S. 426-434.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jürges N, Newig J. What role for frames in scalar conflicts? Land Use Policy. 2015 Dez 1;49:426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

Bibtex

@article{1ef3c43506c24f52a0c10cf4344e5f55,
title = "What role for frames in scalar conflicts?",
abstract = "To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.",
keywords = "Politics, conflict, framing, multi-level governance, Scale, wind energy, sustainability transition",
author = "Nataly J{\"u}rges and Jens Newig",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "426--434",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

AU - Jürges, Nataly

AU - Newig, Jens

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

AB - To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision- making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required.

KW - Politics

KW - conflict

KW - framing

KW - multi-level governance

KW - Scale

KW - wind energy

KW - sustainability transition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940547339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 49

SP - 426

EP - 434

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Populism Personified or Reinvigorated Reformers?
  2. Optical part measuring inside a milling machine
  3. Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies
  4. Das Politische als Kern der politischen Bildung
  5. Wavelet functions for rejecting spurious values
  6. Wege zur Neuorientierung des Wissensmanagements
  7. Corrosion behavior of As-Cast binary Mg-Dy alloys
  8. Optical part measuring inside a milling machine
  9. Genossenschaft, Repräsentation und Partizipation
  10. Machtpolitik im grünen Kleid der Nachhaltigkeit
  11. Europäisierung und nationale Staatsorganisation
  12. Technological opportunities and their rejection
  13. Personalmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben
  14. Risk management with management control systems
  15. The Changing Role of Business in Global Society
  16. Auf dem Weg zu den Kunden des Heilbades/Kurortes
  17. Humanentwicklung, Systemwettbewerb und Demokratie
  18. Vehicle routing planning with joint distribution
  19. CDS spreads, systemic risk and interconnectedness
  20. „Wie wäre es, an psychische Krankheiten zu glauben?“
  21. Öffentliche Räume für Frauen im ländlichen Raum
  22. The role of solutes for grain refinement by (SiC)P
  23. Der Sound und sein soziotechnischer Resonanzraum
  24. Die bilanzielle Behandlung von Handy-Subventionen
  25. Methoden zur Erfolgsmessung im Regionalmarketing
  26. Organisationsentwicklung als Personalentwicklung
  27. Human development and the "explosion" of democracy
  28. Technology Development and Stakeholder Influence
  29. Kooperationen von Managementberatungsunternehmen
  30. Innovations for enabling urban climate governance
  31. Aufbau und Organisation von Entwicklungsprojekten
  32. Geschlechtsspezifische Wirkung von Anreizsystemen?
  33. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  34. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook
  35. Politikberatung in den USA: Ein Vorbild für Europa?
  36. Frauen und Führung- auf das Management kommt es an
  37. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  38. Die Hälfte des Himmels, nicht die Hälfte des Mülls
  39. Geschlechterdemokratie als Maßnahme gegen Gewalt
  40. Tactical and strategic choices in business models
  41. Optimizing price levels in e-commerce applications
  42. Analyse regionaler Marktstrukturen im Kreditwesen
  43. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  44. § 4 Grundzüge des materiellen Fusionskontrollrechts
  45. Extrusion of profiles with variable wall thickness
  46. Dispatching rule selection with Gaussian processes
  47. Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung und Diffusion
  48. Microstructure and thermal response of Mg-Sn alloys
  49. Repräsentation und Partizipation in Organisationen
  50. Political Parties, Elections and Ethnicity in Kenya