What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review
Authors
This chapter adopts a metascientific perspective and discusses two basic questions: (1) What are criteria for evaluating the quality of a psychological theory? (2) What are criteria for evaluating the empirical evidence related to a theory? The chapter discusses these criteria on a general level and by examining one specific theory and accompanying empirical work as an illustrative example—the Strength Model of Self-Control by Baumeister and colleagues (Baumeister and Heatherton Psychol Inq 7:1–15, 1996; Baumeister and Vohs Adv Exp Soc Psychol 54:67–127, 2016). Although necessarily incomplete, the discussed criteria for the quality of theorizing and empiricism can be applied to many theories in (social) psychological research. They are therefore relevant not only to basic research, but also to any applied work that is grounded in theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Social Psychology in Action : Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice |
| Editors | Kai Sassenberg, Michael L. W. Vliek |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Publication date | 01.01.2019 |
| Pages | 3-21 |
| ISBN (print) | 978-3-030-13787-8 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 978-3-030-13788-5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.01.2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.
- Business psychology