Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU. / Strempel, Sebastian; Scheringer, Martin; Ng, Carla et al.
In: Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, No. 11, 05.06.2012, p. 5680-5687.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Strempel S, Scheringer M, Ng C, Hungerbühler K. Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):5680-5687. doi: 10.1021/es3002713

Bibtex

@article{65a18afdd66d4cd7894269b2d4c3d462,
title = "Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU",
abstract = "Under the European chemicals legislation, REACH, industrial chemicals that are imported or manufactured at more than 10 t/yr need to be evaluated with respect to their persistence (P), bioaccumulation potential (B), and toxicity (T). This assessment has to be conducted for several 10 000 of chemicals but, at the same time, empirical data on degradability, bioaccumulation potential and toxicity of industrial chemicals are still scarce. Therefore, the identification of PBT chemicals among all chemicals on the market remains a challenge. We present a PBT screening of approximately 95 000 chemicals based on a comparison of estimated P, B, and T properties of each chemical with the P, B, and T thresholds defined under REACH. We also apply this screening procedure to a set of 2576 high production volume chemicals and a set of 2781 chemicals from the EU's former list of {"}new chemicals{"} (ELINCS). In the set of 95 000 chemicals, the fraction of potential PBT chemicals is around 3%, but in the ELINCS chemicals it reaches 5%. We identify the most common structural elements among the potential PBT chemicals. Analysis of the P, B, and T data for all chemicals considered here shows that the uncertainty in persistence data contributes most to the uncertainty in the number of potential PBT chemicals. {\textcopyright} 2012 American Chemical Society.",
keywords = "Chemistry",
author = "Sebastian Strempel and Martin Scheringer and Carla Ng and Konrad Hungerb{\"u}hler",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1021/es3002713",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "5680--5687",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU

AU - Strempel, Sebastian

AU - Scheringer, Martin

AU - Ng, Carla

AU - Hungerbühler, Konrad

PY - 2012/6/5

Y1 - 2012/6/5

N2 - Under the European chemicals legislation, REACH, industrial chemicals that are imported or manufactured at more than 10 t/yr need to be evaluated with respect to their persistence (P), bioaccumulation potential (B), and toxicity (T). This assessment has to be conducted for several 10 000 of chemicals but, at the same time, empirical data on degradability, bioaccumulation potential and toxicity of industrial chemicals are still scarce. Therefore, the identification of PBT chemicals among all chemicals on the market remains a challenge. We present a PBT screening of approximately 95 000 chemicals based on a comparison of estimated P, B, and T properties of each chemical with the P, B, and T thresholds defined under REACH. We also apply this screening procedure to a set of 2576 high production volume chemicals and a set of 2781 chemicals from the EU's former list of "new chemicals" (ELINCS). In the set of 95 000 chemicals, the fraction of potential PBT chemicals is around 3%, but in the ELINCS chemicals it reaches 5%. We identify the most common structural elements among the potential PBT chemicals. Analysis of the P, B, and T data for all chemicals considered here shows that the uncertainty in persistence data contributes most to the uncertainty in the number of potential PBT chemicals. © 2012 American Chemical Society.

AB - Under the European chemicals legislation, REACH, industrial chemicals that are imported or manufactured at more than 10 t/yr need to be evaluated with respect to their persistence (P), bioaccumulation potential (B), and toxicity (T). This assessment has to be conducted for several 10 000 of chemicals but, at the same time, empirical data on degradability, bioaccumulation potential and toxicity of industrial chemicals are still scarce. Therefore, the identification of PBT chemicals among all chemicals on the market remains a challenge. We present a PBT screening of approximately 95 000 chemicals based on a comparison of estimated P, B, and T properties of each chemical with the P, B, and T thresholds defined under REACH. We also apply this screening procedure to a set of 2576 high production volume chemicals and a set of 2781 chemicals from the EU's former list of "new chemicals" (ELINCS). In the set of 95 000 chemicals, the fraction of potential PBT chemicals is around 3%, but in the ELINCS chemicals it reaches 5%. We identify the most common structural elements among the potential PBT chemicals. Analysis of the P, B, and T data for all chemicals considered here shows that the uncertainty in persistence data contributes most to the uncertainty in the number of potential PBT chemicals. © 2012 American Chemical Society.

KW - Chemistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861849210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7d245daa-f520-3eee-b0f7-dffbd3d42f8a/

U2 - 10.1021/es3002713

DO - 10.1021/es3002713

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 22494215

VL - 46

SP - 5680

EP - 5687

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 11

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Almut Beringer

Publications

  1. Von der Schwierigkeit, Leistung zu steigern
  2. Solidarität in postmigrantischen Allianzen:
  3. Normative Verortungen und Vorgehen im Forschungsprozess
  4. Ökologie der Angst
  5. Das Auf und Ab der Tankstellenpreise
  6. Problematik der Vorfinanzierung von Bürgerwindparks und Lösungsansätze
  7. Lebe wohl, Weihnachtsmann
  8. Von rhetorischer zu organisationaler Realität?
  9. The cyclical overproduction of graduates in germany in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries
  10. Rückbau und Entsorgung in der deutschen Atomwirtschaft
  11. Bewegte Sprache – Ein Leben mit und für Mehrsprachigkeit
  12. Organization
  13. Il corto digitale nell’economia televisiva del ‘momento’
  14. Bildung in Bildern
  15. The concept of personal initiative
  16. Art and the Economy of Attention: On the 1% - the 100 Most Expensive Works of Art
  17. Reporting über Forschung und Entwicklung (F&E) im (Konzern-)Abschluss und -Lagebericht
  18. Ethik und Nachhaltigkeit.
  19. Virtuous Play - Zur Förderung moralischer Sensitivität mit digitalen Spielen
  20. Non scholae, sed vitae discimus!
  21. Wood-pastures of Europe
  22. Logistik-Leitstände in Industrieunternehmen
  23. Sensomotorik – Integration von Koordination und Kraft
  24. Der deutsche Föderalismus zwischen zwei Konventen
  25. Kritik des Ästhetischen - Ästhetik der Kritik
  26. Gute fachliche Praxis
  27. PISA 2003
  28. Ein kleiner Ausblick: Forschungskorridore zum "fachdidaktischen Code" der Lebenswelt- und/oder Situationsorientierung
  29. Soziale Lebensqualität für alle
  30. Heroismus und Vulnerabilität
  31. Entrepreneurial University Archetypes
  32. Woody vegetation of a Peruvian tropical dry forest along a climatic gradient depends more on soil than annual precipitation
  33. Der "fachdidaktische Code" der Lebenswelt- und/oder (?) Situationsorientierung in der fachdidaktischen Diskussion der sozialwissenschaftlichen Unterrichtsfächer sowie des Lernfeldkonzepts
  34. Heterogenität - eine Herausforderung für die Bildung