Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis. / Cuijpers, Pim; Sijbrandij, Marit; Koole, Sander L. et al.
In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 130-140.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Cuijpers, P, Sijbrandij, M, Koole, SL, Huibers, M, Berking, M & Andersson, G 2014, 'Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis', Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002

APA

Vancouver

Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Koole SL, Huibers M, Berking M, Andersson G. Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2014 Mar;34(2):130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002

Bibtex

@article{31f1bc6bc5194459a06dd31a88907494,
title = "Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Recent years have seen a near-doubling of the number of studies examining the effects of psychotherapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults. The present article integrates this new evidence with the older literature through a quantitative meta-analysis. A total of 41 studies (with 2132 patients meeting diagnostic criteria for GAD) were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases, and were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies examined the effects of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The majority of studies used waiting lists as control condition. The pooled effect of the 38 comparisons (from 28 studies) of psychotherapy versus a control group was large (g= 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with low to moderate heterogeneity. The effects based on self-report measures were somewhat lower than those based on clinician-rated instruments. The effects on depression were also large (g= 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82). There were some indications for publication bias. The number of studies comparing CBT with other psychotherapies (e.g., applied relaxation) or pharmacotherapy was too small to draw conclusions about comparative effectiveness or the long-term effects. There were some indications that CBT was also effective at follow-up and that CBT was more effective than applied relaxation in the longer term.",
keywords = "Psychology, Cognitive behavior therapy, Comparative outcome studies, Generalized anxiety disorder, Meta-analysis, Psychotherapy, Randomized trial",
author = "Pim Cuijpers and Marit Sijbrandij and Koole, {Sander L.} and Marcus Huibers and Matthias Berking and Gerhard Andersson",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "130--140",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Sijbrandij, Marit

AU - Koole, Sander L.

AU - Huibers, Marcus

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Andersson, Gerhard

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Recent years have seen a near-doubling of the number of studies examining the effects of psychotherapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults. The present article integrates this new evidence with the older literature through a quantitative meta-analysis. A total of 41 studies (with 2132 patients meeting diagnostic criteria for GAD) were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases, and were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies examined the effects of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The majority of studies used waiting lists as control condition. The pooled effect of the 38 comparisons (from 28 studies) of psychotherapy versus a control group was large (g= 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with low to moderate heterogeneity. The effects based on self-report measures were somewhat lower than those based on clinician-rated instruments. The effects on depression were also large (g= 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82). There were some indications for publication bias. The number of studies comparing CBT with other psychotherapies (e.g., applied relaxation) or pharmacotherapy was too small to draw conclusions about comparative effectiveness or the long-term effects. There were some indications that CBT was also effective at follow-up and that CBT was more effective than applied relaxation in the longer term.

AB - Recent years have seen a near-doubling of the number of studies examining the effects of psychotherapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adults. The present article integrates this new evidence with the older literature through a quantitative meta-analysis. A total of 41 studies (with 2132 patients meeting diagnostic criteria for GAD) were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases, and were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies examined the effects of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The majority of studies used waiting lists as control condition. The pooled effect of the 38 comparisons (from 28 studies) of psychotherapy versus a control group was large (g= 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97) with low to moderate heterogeneity. The effects based on self-report measures were somewhat lower than those based on clinician-rated instruments. The effects on depression were also large (g= 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82). There were some indications for publication bias. The number of studies comparing CBT with other psychotherapies (e.g., applied relaxation) or pharmacotherapy was too small to draw conclusions about comparative effectiveness or the long-term effects. There were some indications that CBT was also effective at follow-up and that CBT was more effective than applied relaxation in the longer term.

KW - Psychology

KW - Cognitive behavior therapy

KW - Comparative outcome studies

KW - Generalized anxiety disorder

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Randomized trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893361841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/79c18c9b-873f-3131-af40-286c0f013857/

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 24487344

AN - SCOPUS:84893361841

VL - 34

SP - 130

EP - 140

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

IS - 2

ER -